From: Andrea Righi <arighi@nvidia.com>
To: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Cc: David Vernet <void@manifault.com>,
Changwoo Min <changwoo@igalia.com>,
sched-ext@lists.linux.dev, Emil Tsalapatis <emil@etsalapatis.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCHSET v2 sched_ext/for-7.1] sched_ext: Implement SCX_ENQ_IMMED
Date: Fri, 13 Mar 2026 20:21:53 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <abRj0b4CKMnuwjos@gpd4> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260313113114.1591010-1-tj@kernel.org>
On Fri, Mar 13, 2026 at 01:31:08AM -1000, Tejun Heo wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Currently, BPF schedulers that want to ensure tasks don't linger on local
> DSQs behind other tasks or on CPUs taken by higher-priority scheduling
> classes must resort to hooking the sched_switch tracepoint or implementing
> the now-deprecated ops.cpu_acquire/release(). Both approaches are cumbersome
> and partial - sched_switch doesn't handle cases where a local DSQ ends up
> with multiple tasks queued, which can be difficult to control perfectly.
> cpu_release() is even more limited, missing cases like a higher-priority
> task waking up while an idle CPU is waking up to an SCX task. Neither can
> atomically determine whether a CPU is truly available at the moment of
> dispatch.
>
> SCX_ENQ_IMMED replaces these with a single dispatch flag that provides a
> kernel-enforced guarantee: a task dispatched with IMMED either gets on the
> CPU immediately, or gets reenqueued back to the BPF scheduler. It will never
> linger on a local DSQ behind other tasks or be silently put back after
> preemption. This gives BPF schedulers comprehensive latency control directly
> in the dispatch path.
>
> The protection is persistent - it survives SAVE/RESTORE cycles, slice
> extensions and higher-priority class preemptions. If an IMMED task is
> preempted while running, it gets reenqueued through ops.enqueue() with
> SCX_TASK_REENQ_PREEMPTED instead of silently placed back on the local DSQ.
>
> This also enables opportunistic CPU sharing across sub-schedulers. Without
> IMMED, a sub-scheduler can stuff the local DSQ of a shared CPU, making it
> difficult for others to use. With IMMED, tasks only stay on a CPU when they
> can actually run, keeping CPUs available for other schedulers.
>
> Patches 1-2 are prep refactoring. Patch 3 implements SCX_ENQ_IMMED. Patches
> 4-5 plumb enq_flags through the consume and move_to_local paths so IMMED
> works on those paths too. Patch 6 adds SCX_OPS_ALWAYS_ENQ_IMMED.
>
> v2: - Split prep patches out of main IMMED patch (#1, #2).
> - Rewrite is_curr_done() as rq_is_open() using rq->next_class and
> implement wakeup_preempt_scx() for complete higher-class preemption
> coverage (#3).
> - Track IMMED persistently in p->scx.flags and reenqueue
> preempted-while-running tasks through ops.enqueue() (#3).
> - Drop "disallow setting slice to zero" patch - no longer needed with
> rq_is_open() approach.
> - Plumb enq_flags through consume and move_to_local paths (#4, #5).
> - Cover scx_bpf_dsq_move_to_local() in OPS_ALWAYS_IMMED (#6).
> - Remove obsolete sched_switch tracepoint and cpu_release handlers
> from scx_qmap, add IMMED stress test (#6) (Andrea Righi).
>
> v1: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20260307002817.1298341-1-tj@kernel.org
Only found a small typo in patch 3, everything else looks good to me.
Reviewed-by: Andrea Righi <arighi@nvidia.com>
Thanks,
-Andrea
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-03-13 19:22 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-03-13 11:31 [PATCHSET v2 sched_ext/for-7.1] sched_ext: Implement SCX_ENQ_IMMED Tejun Heo
2026-03-13 11:31 ` [PATCH 1/6] sched_ext: Split task_should_reenq() into local and user variants Tejun Heo
2026-03-13 11:31 ` [PATCH 2/6] sched_ext: Add scx_vet_enq_flags() and plumb dsq_id into preamble Tejun Heo
2026-03-13 11:31 ` [PATCH 3/6] sched_ext: Implement SCX_ENQ_IMMED Tejun Heo
2026-03-13 19:15 ` Andrea Righi
2026-03-13 11:31 ` [PATCH 4/6] sched_ext: Plumb enq_flags through the consume path Tejun Heo
2026-03-13 11:31 ` [PATCH 5/6] sched_ext: Add enq_flags to scx_bpf_dsq_move_to_local() Tejun Heo
2026-03-13 11:31 ` [PATCH 6/6] sched_ext: Add SCX_OPS_ALWAYS_ENQ_IMMED ops flag Tejun Heo
2026-03-13 18:37 ` [PATCH 7/6 sched_ext/for-7.1] sched_ext: Use schedule_deferred_locked() in schedule_dsq_reenq() Tejun Heo
2026-03-13 19:21 ` Andrea Righi [this message]
2026-03-13 19:45 ` [PATCHSET v2 sched_ext/for-7.1] sched_ext: Implement SCX_ENQ_IMMED Tejun Heo
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=abRj0b4CKMnuwjos@gpd4 \
--to=arighi@nvidia.com \
--cc=changwoo@igalia.com \
--cc=emil@etsalapatis.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sched-ext@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=tj@kernel.org \
--cc=void@manifault.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox