From: Hangbin Liu <liuhangbin@gmail.com>
To: Simon Horman <horms@kernel.org>
Cc: jv@jvosburgh.net, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
netdev@vger.kernel.org, davem@davemloft.net, sd@queasysnail.net,
andrew+netdev@lunn.ch, pabeni@redhat.com,
sridhar.samudrala@intel.com, jiri@resnulli.us,
bridge@lists.linux.dev, edumazet@google.com, kuba@kernel.org,
razor@blackwall.org, idosch@nvidia.com
Subject: Re: [net-next,v2,1/4] net: use ndo_set_features to set offload features for bonding/bridge/team
Date: Mon, 16 Mar 2026 01:02:01 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <abdWiYhu4IOldqtE@fedora> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260315161943.1419237-1-horms@kernel.org>
On Sun, Mar 15, 2026 at 04:19:43PM +0000, Simon Horman wrote:
> > diff --git a/net/core/dev.c b/net/core/dev.c
> > index f48dc299e4b2..16b3fc620807 100644
> > --- a/net/core/dev.c
> > +++ b/net/core/dev.c
> > @@ -8920,6 +8920,9 @@ static int __netdev_upper_dev_link(struct net_device *dev,
> > __netdev_walk_all_upper_dev(upper_dev, __netdev_update_lower_level,
> > priv);
> >
> > + /* re-compute all features after adding link */
> > + netdev_change_features(upper_dev);
> > +
> > return 0;
> >
> > rollback:
>
> Can the feature computation skip updating ancillary fields when features
> don't change?
>
> The new architecture routes computation through netdev_change_features() ->
> __netdev_update_features() -> ndo_set_features(). However,
> __netdev_update_features() has this check:
>
> net/core/dev.c:__netdev_update_features() {
> ...
> if (dev->features == features)
> goto sync_lower;
>
Ah, yes. In the RFC patch set[1], I wanted to use a new ndo_update_offloads
callback to handle offload updates. But in the formal patch, I thought we
could avoid introducing a new callback and use ndo_set_features directly.
However, it looks like we need to fall back to ndo_update_offloads now.
[1] https://lore.kernel.org/netdev/20260226114208.27774-1-liuhangbin@gmail.com/
Thanks
Hangbin
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-03-16 1:02 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-03-13 3:03 [PATCH net-next v2 0/4] net: move netdev_compute_master_upper_features to ndo_set_features Hangbin Liu
2026-03-13 3:03 ` [PATCH net-next v2 1/4] net: use ndo_set_features to set offload features for bonding/bridge/team Hangbin Liu
2026-03-15 16:19 ` [net-next,v2,1/4] " Simon Horman
2026-03-16 1:02 ` Hangbin Liu [this message]
2026-03-13 3:03 ` [PATCH net-next v2 2/4] macsec: move netdev_upper_dev_link() after macsec_changelink_common() Hangbin Liu
2026-03-13 3:03 ` [PATCH net-next v2 3/4] failover: use ndo_set_features for failover offload compute Hangbin Liu
2026-03-13 3:03 ` [PATCH net-next v2 4/4] net: no need to disable LRO specifically Hangbin Liu
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=abdWiYhu4IOldqtE@fedora \
--to=liuhangbin@gmail.com \
--cc=andrew+netdev@lunn.ch \
--cc=bridge@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=horms@kernel.org \
--cc=idosch@nvidia.com \
--cc=jiri@resnulli.us \
--cc=jv@jvosburgh.net \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
--cc=razor@blackwall.org \
--cc=sd@queasysnail.net \
--cc=sridhar.samudrala@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox