public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Paul Chaignon <paul.chaignon@gmail.com>
To: Tiezhu Yang <yangtiezhu@loongson.cn>
Cc: Emil Tsalapatis <emil@etsalapatis.com>,
	Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>,
	Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>,
	Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>,
	Hengqi Chen <hengqi.chen@gmail.com>,
	loongarch@lists.linux.dev, bpf@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf-next v1 1/2] selftests/bpf: Check alignment flag if expected result is REJECT
Date: Mon, 16 Mar 2026 14:04:48 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <abf_8FcnQr50CCTn@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <7ea56716-fd5f-1740-e634-1dec4196dd2c@loongson.cn>

On Thu, Mar 12, 2026 at 07:06:38PM +0800, Tiezhu Yang wrote:
> On 03/12/2026 05:29 PM, Paul Chaignon wrote:
> > On Thu, Mar 12, 2026 at 02:59:57PM +0800, Tiezhu Yang wrote:

[...]

> > > -#14/p Dest pointer in r0 - succeed, check 5 OK
> > > +#14/p Dest pointer in r0 - succeed, check 5 OK (NOTE: not executed due to
> > > unknown alignment)
> > 
> > As stated in my previous answer, this note would be incorrect: the
> > program was executed in test case #14 because it was rejected, not
> > because of unknown alignment.
> 
> OK, please ignore this patch.

I think the second patch in this set is still worthwhile, so maybe
resend it on its own?

Paul

> 
> Thanks,
> Tiezhu
> 

  reply	other threads:[~2026-03-16 13:04 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-03-10  6:45 [PATCH bpf-next v1 0/2] Modify some code about test_verifier Tiezhu Yang
2026-03-10  6:45 ` [PATCH bpf-next v1 1/2] selftests/bpf: Check alignment flag if expected result is REJECT Tiezhu Yang
2026-03-11 15:56   ` Emil Tsalapatis
2026-03-12  6:59     ` Tiezhu Yang
2026-03-12  9:29       ` Paul Chaignon
2026-03-12 11:06         ` Tiezhu Yang
2026-03-16 13:04           ` Paul Chaignon [this message]
2026-03-17  1:56             ` Tiezhu Yang
2026-03-11 16:11   ` Paul Chaignon
2026-03-10  6:45 ` [PATCH bpf-next v1 2/2] selftests/bpf: Add alignment flag for test_verifier 190 testcase Tiezhu Yang
2026-03-11 15:57   ` Emil Tsalapatis
2026-03-11 16:13   ` Paul Chaignon

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=abf_8FcnQr50CCTn@mail.gmail.com \
    --to=paul.chaignon@gmail.com \
    --cc=andrii@kernel.org \
    --cc=ast@kernel.org \
    --cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
    --cc=emil@etsalapatis.com \
    --cc=hengqi.chen@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=loongarch@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=yangtiezhu@loongson.cn \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox