public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Kuan-Wei Chiu <visitorckw@gmail.com>
To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
Cc: Richard Weinberger <richard@nod.at>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	chengzhihao1 <chengzhihao1@huawei.com>,
	jserv <jserv@ccns.ncku.edu.tw>, eleanor15x <eleanor15x@gmail.com>,
	marscheng <marscheng@google.com>,
	linux-mtd <linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org>,
	linux-kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] lib/list_sort: introduce list_sort_nonatomic() and remove dummy cmp() calls
Date: Wed, 18 Mar 2026 00:08:52 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <abl8lJ5_hFSRHu6-@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <abln0mfbHdueNgtD@infradead.org>

On Tue, Mar 17, 2026 at 07:40:18AM -0700, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 17, 2026 at 03:38:41PM +0100, Richard Weinberger wrote:
> > ----- Ursprüngliche Mail -----
> > >> For UBIFS, this patch doesn't alter the frequency, timing, or behavior
> > >> of the cond_resched() calls at all, so I am confident that this won't
> > >> introduce any regressions.
> > > 
> > > I'd be tempted to drop the workaround and remove the cond_resched
> > > from ubifs given that entirely non-preemptible scheduling models are
> > > on their way out.
> > 
> > arm32 still has no preempt-lazy.
> > This is one of the biggest platforms where UBIFS is still used.
> 
> Time to fix that if it wants to stay alive.
> 
It seems that dropping cond_resched() right now would cause issues for
UBIFS.

Given that, let's stick with current plan for now. If we reach a point
in the future where it's safe to drop these scheduling points, we can
always revisit this and remove then.

Regards,
Kuan-Wei

  reply	other threads:[~2026-03-17 16:08 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-03-15 19:39 [PATCH] lib/list_sort: introduce list_sort_nonatomic() and remove dummy cmp() calls Kuan-Wei Chiu
2026-03-16  7:25 ` Richard Weinberger
2026-03-16 18:04   ` Kuan-Wei Chiu
2026-03-16 21:49     ` Richard Weinberger
2026-03-17 14:22     ` Christoph Hellwig
2026-03-17 14:38       ` Richard Weinberger
2026-03-17 14:40         ` Christoph Hellwig
2026-03-17 16:08           ` Kuan-Wei Chiu [this message]
2026-03-17  4:05 ` Zhihao Cheng
2026-03-17 12:32   ` Kuan-Wei Chiu
2026-03-17 13:22     ` Zhihao Cheng
2026-03-17 14:15       ` Kuan-Wei Chiu

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=abl8lJ5_hFSRHu6-@google.com \
    --to=visitorckw@gmail.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=chengzhihao1@huawei.com \
    --cc=eleanor15x@gmail.com \
    --cc=hch@infradead.org \
    --cc=jserv@ccns.ncku.edu.tw \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=marscheng@google.com \
    --cc=richard@nod.at \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox