From: Pranjal Shrivastava <praan@google.com>
To: Samiullah Khawaja <skhawaja@google.com>
Cc: David Woodhouse <dwmw2@infradead.org>,
Lu Baolu <baolu.lu@linux.intel.com>,
Joerg Roedel <joro@8bytes.org>, Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@ziepe.ca>,
Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@arm.com>,
Kevin Tian <kevin.tian@intel.com>,
Alex Williamson <alex@shazbot.org>, Shuah Khan <shuah@kernel.org>,
iommu@lists.linux.dev, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
kvm@vger.kernel.org, Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@nvidia.com>,
Adithya Jayachandran <ajayachandra@nvidia.com>,
Parav Pandit <parav@nvidia.com>,
Leon Romanovsky <leonro@nvidia.com>, William Tu <witu@nvidia.com>,
Pratyush Yadav <pratyush@kernel.org>,
Pasha Tatashin <pasha.tatashin@soleen.com>,
David Matlack <dmatlack@google.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Chris Li <chrisl@kernel.org>, Vipin Sharma <vipinsh@google.com>,
YiFei Zhu <zhuyifei@google.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 02/14] iommu: Implement IOMMU core liveupdate skeleton
Date: Tue, 17 Mar 2026 20:23:38 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <abm4ShqPTxIujDlt@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <abm1esL1dzN7NTC7@google.com>
On Tue, Mar 17, 2026 at 08:13:47PM +0000, Samiullah Khawaja wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 17, 2026 at 08:09:26PM +0000, Pranjal Shrivastava wrote:
> > On Fri, Mar 13, 2026 at 06:42:05PM +0000, Samiullah Khawaja wrote:
> > > On Thu, Mar 12, 2026 at 11:10:36PM +0000, Pranjal Shrivastava wrote:
> > > > On Tue, Feb 03, 2026 at 10:09:36PM +0000, Samiullah Khawaja wrote:
> > > > > Add IOMMU domain ops that can be implemented by the IOMMU drivers if
> > > > > they support IOMMU domain preservation across liveupdate. The new IOMMU
> > > > > domain preserve, unpreserve and restore APIs call these ops to perform
> > > > > respective live update operations.
> > > > >
> > > > > Similarly add IOMMU ops to preserve/unpreserve a device. These can be
> > > > > implemented by the IOMMU drivers that support preservation of devices
> > > > > that have their IOMMU domains preserved. During device preservation the
> > > > > state of the associated IOMMU is also preserved. The device can only be
> > > > > preserved if the attached iommu domain is preserved and the associated
> > > > > iommu supports preservation.
> > > > >
> > > > > The preserved state of the device and IOMMU needs to be fetched during
> > > > > shutdown and boot in the next kernel. Add APIs that can be used to fetch
> > > > > the preserved state of a device and IOMMU. The APIs will only be used
> > > > > during shutdown and after liveupdate so no locking needed.
> > > > >
> > > > > Signed-off-by: Samiullah Khawaja <skhawaja@google.com>
> > > > > ---
> > > > > drivers/iommu/iommu.c | 3 +
> > > > > drivers/iommu/liveupdate.c | 326 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> > > > > include/linux/iommu-lu.h | 119 ++++++++++++++
> > > > > include/linux/iommu.h | 32 ++++
> > > > > 4 files changed, 480 insertions(+)
> > > > >
> > > > > diff --git a/drivers/iommu/iommu.c b/drivers/iommu/iommu.c
> > > > > index 4926a43118e6..c0632cb5b570 100644
> > > > > --- a/drivers/iommu/iommu.c
> > > > > +++ b/drivers/iommu/iommu.c
> > > > > @@ -389,6 +389,9 @@ static struct dev_iommu *dev_iommu_get(struct device *dev)
> > > > >
> > > > > mutex_init(¶m->lock);
> > > > > dev->iommu = param;
> > > > > +#ifdef CONFIG_IOMMU_LIVEUPDATE
> > > > > + dev->iommu->device_ser = NULL;
> > > > > +#endif
> > > > > return param;
> > > > > }
> > > > >
> > > > > diff --git a/drivers/iommu/liveupdate.c b/drivers/iommu/liveupdate.c
> > > > > index 6189ba32ff2c..83eb609b3fd7 100644
> > > > > --- a/drivers/iommu/liveupdate.c
> > > > > +++ b/drivers/iommu/liveupdate.c
> > > > > @@ -11,6 +11,7 @@
> > > > > #include <linux/liveupdate.h>
> > > > > #include <linux/iommu-lu.h>
> > > > > #include <linux/iommu.h>
> > > > > +#include <linux/pci.h>
> > > > > #include <linux/errno.h>
> > > > >
> > > > > static void iommu_liveupdate_restore_objs(u64 next)
> > > > > @@ -175,3 +176,328 @@ int iommu_liveupdate_unregister_flb(struct liveupdate_file_handler *handler)
> > > > > return liveupdate_unregister_flb(handler, &iommu_flb);
> > > > > }
> > > > > EXPORT_SYMBOL(iommu_liveupdate_unregister_flb);
> > > > > +
> > > > > +int iommu_for_each_preserved_device(iommu_preserved_device_iter_fn fn,
> > > > > + void *arg)
> > > > > +{
> > > > > + struct iommu_lu_flb_obj *obj;
> > > > > + struct devices_ser *devices;
> > > > > + int ret, i, idx;
> > > > > +
> > > > > + ret = liveupdate_flb_get_incoming(&iommu_flb, (void **)&obj);
> > > > > + if (ret)
> > > > > + return -ENOENT;
> > > > > +
> > > > > + devices = __va(obj->ser->devices_phys);
> > > > > + for (i = 0, idx = 0; i < obj->ser->nr_devices; ++i, ++idx) {
> > > > > + if (idx >= MAX_DEVICE_SERS) {
> > > > > + devices = __va(devices->objs.next_objs);
> > > > > + idx = 0;
> > > > > + }
> > > > > +
> > > > > + if (devices->devices[idx].obj.deleted)
> > > > > + continue;
> > > > > +
> > > > > + ret = fn(&devices->devices[idx], arg);
> > > > > + if (ret)
> > > > > + return ret;
> > > > > + }
> > > > > +
> > > > > + return 0;
> > > > > +}
> > > > > +EXPORT_SYMBOL(iommu_for_each_preserved_device);
> > > > > +
> > > > > +static inline bool device_ser_match(struct device_ser *match,
> > > > > + struct pci_dev *pdev)
> > > > > +{
> > > > > + return match->devid == pci_dev_id(pdev) && match->pci_domain == pci_domain_nr(pdev->bus);
> > > > > +}
> > > > > +
> > > > > +struct device_ser *iommu_get_device_preserved_data(struct device *dev)
> > > > > +{
> > > > > + struct iommu_lu_flb_obj *obj;
> > > > > + struct devices_ser *devices;
> > > > > + int ret, i, idx;
> > > > > +
> > > > > + if (!dev_is_pci(dev))
> > > > > + return NULL;
> > > > > +
> > > > > + ret = liveupdate_flb_get_incoming(&iommu_flb, (void **)&obj);
> > > > > + if (ret)
> > > > > + return NULL;
> > > > > +
> > > > > + devices = __va(obj->ser->devices_phys);
> > > > > + for (i = 0, idx = 0; i < obj->ser->nr_devices; ++i, ++idx) {
> > > > > + if (idx >= MAX_DEVICE_SERS) {
> > > > > + devices = __va(devices->objs.next_objs);
> > > > > + idx = 0;
> > > > > + }
> > > > > +
> > > > > + if (devices->devices[idx].obj.deleted)
> > > > > + continue;
> > > > > +
> > > > > + if (device_ser_match(&devices->devices[idx], to_pci_dev(dev))) {
> > > > > + devices->devices[idx].obj.incoming = true;
> > > > > + return &devices->devices[idx];
> > > > > + }
> > > > > + }
> > > > > +
> > > > > + return NULL;
> > > > > +}
> > > > > +EXPORT_SYMBOL(iommu_get_device_preserved_data);
> > > > > +
> > > > > +struct iommu_ser *iommu_get_preserved_data(u64 token, enum iommu_lu_type type)
> > > > > +{
> > > > > + struct iommu_lu_flb_obj *obj;
> > > > > + struct iommus_ser *iommus;
> > > > > + int ret, i, idx;
> > > > > +
> > > > > + ret = liveupdate_flb_get_incoming(&iommu_flb, (void **)&obj);
> > > > > + if (ret)
> > > > > + return NULL;
> > > > > +
> > > > > + iommus = __va(obj->ser->iommus_phys);
> > > > > + for (i = 0, idx = 0; i < obj->ser->nr_iommus; ++i, ++idx) {
> > > > > + if (idx >= MAX_IOMMU_SERS) {
> > > > > + iommus = __va(iommus->objs.next_objs);
> > > > > + idx = 0;
> > > > > + }
> > > > > +
> > > > > + if (iommus->iommus[idx].obj.deleted)
> > > > > + continue;
> > > > > +
> > > > > + if (iommus->iommus[idx].token == token &&
> > > > > + iommus->iommus[idx].type == type)
> > > > > + return &iommus->iommus[idx];
> > > > > + }
> > > > > +
> > > > > + return NULL;
> > > > > +}
> > > > > +EXPORT_SYMBOL(iommu_get_preserved_data);
> > > > > +
> >
> > Also, I don't see these helpers being used anywhere in this series yet?
> > Should we add them with the phase-2 series? When we actually "Restore"
> > the domain?
>
> Phase 1 does restore the iommu and domains during boot. But the
> iommufd/hwpt state is not restored or re-associated with the restored
> domains.
>
> These helpers are used to fetch the preserved state during boot.
>
> Thanks,
> Sami
I see these are used in PATCH 8, should we introduce these helpers in
PATCH 8 where we actually use them? As we introduce iommu_restore_domain
in PATCH 8?
Thanks,
Praan
> >
> > > > > +static int reserve_obj_ser(struct iommu_objs_ser **objs_ptr, u64 max_objs)
> > > >
> > > > Isn't this more of an "insert" / "populate" / write_ser_entry? We can
> > > > rename it to something like iommu_ser_push_entry / iommu_ser_write_entry
> > >
> > > This is reserving an object in the objects array. The object is filled
> > > once reservation is done. Maybe I can call it alloc_obj_ser or
> > > alloc_entry_ser.
> > > >
> > > > > +{
> > > > > + struct iommu_objs_ser *next_objs, *objs = *objs_ptr;
> > > >
> > > > Not loving these names :(
> > > >
> > > > TBH, the reserve_obj_ser function isn't too readable, esp. with all the
> > > > variable names, here and in the lu header.. I've had to go back n forth
> > > > to the first patch. For example, here next_objs can be next_objs_page &
> > > > objs can be curr_page. (PTAL at my reply on PATCH 01 about renaming).
> > >
> > > Basically with current naming there are "serialization objects" in
> > > "serializatoin object arrays". The object is a "base" type with
> > > "inherited" types for iommu, domain etc. I will add explanation of all
> > > this in the ABI header.
> > >
> > > Maybe we can name it to:
> > >
> > > struct iommu_obj_ser;
> > > struct iommu_obj_array_ser; or struct iommu_obj_ser_array;
> > >
> > > Then for reserve/alloc, we use names like "next_obj_array" and
> > > "curr_obj_array"?
> > > >
> > > > > + int idx;
> > > > > +
> > > > > + if (objs->nr_objs == max_objs) {
> > > > > + next_objs = kho_alloc_preserve(PAGE_SIZE);
> > > > > + if (IS_ERR(next_objs))
> > > > > + return PTR_ERR(next_objs);
> > > > > +
> > > > > + objs->next_objs = virt_to_phys(next_objs);
> > > > > + objs = next_objs;
> > > > > + *objs_ptr = objs;
> > > > > + objs->nr_objs = 0;
> > > > > + objs->next_objs = 0;
> > > >
> > > > This seems redundant, no need to zero these out, kho_alloc_preserve
> > > > passes __GFP_ZERO to folio_alloc [1], which should z-alloc the pages.
> > >
> > > Agreed. Will remove this.
> > > >
> > > > > + }
> > > > > +
> > > > > + idx = objs->nr_objs++;
> > > > > + return idx;
> > > > > +}
> > > >
> > > > Just to give a mental model to fellow reviewers, here's how this is laid
> > > > out:
> > > >
> > > > ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > > [ PAGE START ] |
> > > > ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > > | iommu_objs_ser (The Page Header) |
> > > > | - next_objs: 0x0000 (End of the page-chain) |
> > > > | - nr_objs: 2 |
> > > > ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > > | ITEM 0: iommu_domain_ser |
> > > > | [ iommu_obj_ser (The entry header) ] |
> > > > | - idx: 0 |
> > > > | - ref_count: 1 |
> > > > | - deleted: 0 |
> > > > | [ Domain Data ] |
> > > > ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > > | ITEM 1: iommu_domain_ser |
> > > > | [ iommu_obj_ser (The Price Tag) ] |
> > > > | - idx: 1 |
> > > > | - ref_count: 1 |
> > > > | - deleted: 0 |
> > > > | [ Domain Data ] |
> > > > ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > > | ... (Empty space for more domains) ... |
> > > > | |
> > > > ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > > [ PAGE END ] |
> > > > ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> > >
> > > +1
> > >
> > > Will add a table in the header as you suggested.
> > > >
> > > > > +
> > > > > +int iommu_domain_preserve(struct iommu_domain *domain, struct iommu_domain_ser **ser)
> > > > > +{
> > > > > + struct iommu_domain_ser *domain_ser;
> > > > > + struct iommu_lu_flb_obj *flb_obj;
> > > > > + int idx, ret;
> > > > > +
> > > > > + if (!domain->ops->preserve)
> > > > > + return -EOPNOTSUPP;
> > > > > +
> > > > > + ret = liveupdate_flb_get_outgoing(&iommu_flb, (void **)&flb_obj);
> > > > > + if (ret)
> > > > > + return ret;
> > > > > +
> > > > > + guard(mutex)(&flb_obj->lock);
> > > > > + idx = reserve_obj_ser((struct iommu_objs_ser **)&flb_obj->iommu_domains,
> > > > > + MAX_IOMMU_DOMAIN_SERS);
> > > > > + if (idx < 0)
> > > > > + return idx;
> > > > > +
> > > > > + domain_ser = &flb_obj->iommu_domains->iommu_domains[idx];
> > > >
> > > > This is slightly less-readable as well, I understand we're trying to:
> > > >
> > > > iommu_domains_ser -> iommu_domain_ser[idx] but the same name
> > > > (iommu_domains) makes it difficult to read.. we should rename this as:
> > >
> > > Agreed.
> > >
> > > I will update it to,
> > >
> > > &flb_obj->curr_iommu_domains->domain_array[idx]
> > > >
> > > > &flb_obj->iommu_domains_page->domain_entries[idx] or something for
> > > > better readability..
> > > >
> > > > Also, let's add a comment explaining that reserve_obj_ser actually
> > > > advances the flb_obj ptr when necessary..
> > >
> > > Agreed.
> > > >
> > > > IIUC, we start with PAGE 0 initially, store it's phys in the
> > > > iommu_flb_preserve op (the iommu_ser_phys et al) & then we go on
> > > > alloc-ing more pages and keep storing the "current" active page with the
> > > > liveupdate core. Now when we jump into the new kernel, we read the
> > > > ser_phys and then follow the page chain, right?
> > >
> > > Yes, we do an initial allocation of arrays for each object type and then
> > > later allocate more as needed. The flb_obj holds the address of
> > > currently active array.
> > >
> > > I will add this explanation in the header.
> > > >
> > > > > + idx = flb_obj->ser->nr_domains++;
> > > > > + domain_ser->obj.idx = idx;
> > > > > + domain_ser->obj.ref_count = 1;
> > > > > +
> > > > > + ret = domain->ops->preserve(domain, domain_ser);
> > > > > + if (ret) {
> > > > > + domain_ser->obj.deleted = true;
> > > > > + return ret;
> > > > > + }
> > > > > +
> > > > > + domain->preserved_state = domain_ser;
> > > > > + *ser = domain_ser;
> > > > > + return 0;
> > > > > +}
> > > > > +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(iommu_domain_preserve);
> > > > > +
> > > > > +void iommu_domain_unpreserve(struct iommu_domain *domain)
> > > > > +{
> > > > > + struct iommu_domain_ser *domain_ser;
> > > > > + struct iommu_lu_flb_obj *flb_obj;
> > > > > + int ret;
> > > > > +
> > > > > + if (!domain->ops->unpreserve)
> > > > > + return;
> > > > > +
> > > > > + ret = liveupdate_flb_get_outgoing(&iommu_flb, (void **)&flb_obj);
> > > > > + if (ret)
> > > > > + return;
> > > > > +
> > > > > + guard(mutex)(&flb_obj->lock);
> > > > > +
> > > > > + /*
> > > > > + * There is no check for attached devices here. The correctness relies
> > > > > + * on the Live Update Orchestrator's session lifecycle. All resources
> > > > > + * (iommufd, vfio devices) are preserved within a single session. If the
> > > > > + * session is torn down, the .unpreserve callbacks for all files will be
> > > > > + * invoked, ensuring a consistent cleanup without needing explicit
> > > > > + * refcounting for the serialized objects here.
> > > > > + */
> > > > > + domain_ser = domain->preserved_state;
> > > > > + domain->ops->unpreserve(domain, domain_ser);
> > > > > + domain_ser->obj.deleted = true;
> > > > > + domain->preserved_state = NULL;
> > > > > +}
> > > > > +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(iommu_domain_unpreserve);
> > > > > +
> > > > > +static int iommu_preserve_locked(struct iommu_device *iommu)
> > > > > +{
> > > > > + struct iommu_lu_flb_obj *flb_obj;
> > > > > + struct iommu_ser *iommu_ser;
> > > > > + int idx, ret;
> > > > > +
> > > > > + if (!iommu->ops->preserve)
> > > > > + return -EOPNOTSUPP;
> > > > > +
> > > > > + if (iommu->outgoing_preserved_state) {
> > > > > + iommu->outgoing_preserved_state->obj.ref_count++;
> > > > > + return 0;
> > > > > + }
> > > > > +
> > > > > + ret = liveupdate_flb_get_outgoing(&iommu_flb, (void **)&flb_obj);
> > > > > + if (ret)
> > > > > + return ret;
> > > > > +
> > > > > + idx = reserve_obj_ser((struct iommu_objs_ser **)&flb_obj->iommus,
> > > > > + MAX_IOMMU_SERS);
> > > > > + if (idx < 0)
> > > > > + return idx;
> > > > > +
> > > > > + iommu_ser = &flb_obj->iommus->iommus[idx];
> > > > > + idx = flb_obj->ser->nr_iommus++;
> > > > > + iommu_ser->obj.idx = idx;
> > > > > + iommu_ser->obj.ref_count = 1;
> > > > > +
> > > > > + ret = iommu->ops->preserve(iommu, iommu_ser);
> > > > > + if (ret)
> > > > > + iommu_ser->obj.deleted = true;
> > > > > +
> > > > > + iommu->outgoing_preserved_state = iommu_ser;
> > > > > + return ret;
> > > > > +}
> > > > > +
> > > > > +static void iommu_unpreserve_locked(struct iommu_device *iommu)
> > > > > +{
> > > > > + struct iommu_ser *iommu_ser = iommu->outgoing_preserved_state;
> > > > > +
> > > > > + iommu_ser->obj.ref_count--;
> > > > > + if (iommu_ser->obj.ref_count)
> > > > > + return;
> > > > > +
> > > > > + iommu->outgoing_preserved_state = NULL;
> > > > > + iommu->ops->unpreserve(iommu, iommu_ser);
> > > > > + iommu_ser->obj.deleted = true;
> > > > > +}
> > > > > +
> > > > > +int iommu_preserve_device(struct iommu_domain *domain,
> > > > > + struct device *dev, u64 token)
> > > > > +{
> > > > > + struct iommu_lu_flb_obj *flb_obj;
> > > > > + struct device_ser *device_ser;
> > > > > + struct dev_iommu *iommu;
> > > > > + struct pci_dev *pdev;
> > > > > + int ret, idx;
> > > > > +
> > > > > + if (!dev_is_pci(dev))
> > > > > + return -EOPNOTSUPP;
> > > > > +
> > > > > + if (!domain->preserved_state)
> > > > > + return -EINVAL;
> > > > > +
> > > > > + pdev = to_pci_dev(dev);
> > > > > + iommu = dev->iommu;
> > > > > + if (!iommu->iommu_dev->ops->preserve_device ||
> > > > > + !iommu->iommu_dev->ops->preserve)
> > > > > + return -EOPNOTSUPP;
> > > > > +
> > > > > + ret = liveupdate_flb_get_outgoing(&iommu_flb, (void **)&flb_obj);
> > > > > + if (ret)
> > > > > + return ret;
> > > > > +
> > > > > + guard(mutex)(&flb_obj->lock);
> > > > > + idx = reserve_obj_ser((struct iommu_objs_ser **)&flb_obj->devices,
> > > > > + MAX_DEVICE_SERS);
> > > > > + if (idx < 0)
> > > > > + return idx;
> > > > > +
> > > > > + device_ser = &flb_obj->devices->devices[idx];
> > > > > + idx = flb_obj->ser->nr_devices++;
> > > > > + device_ser->obj.idx = idx;
> > > > > + device_ser->obj.ref_count = 1;
> > > > > +
> > > > > + ret = iommu_preserve_locked(iommu->iommu_dev);
> > > > > + if (ret) {
> > > > > + device_ser->obj.deleted = true;
> > > > > + return ret;
> > > > > + }
> > > > > +
> > > > > + device_ser->domain_iommu_ser.domain_phys = __pa(domain->preserved_state);
> > > > > + device_ser->domain_iommu_ser.iommu_phys = __pa(iommu->iommu_dev->outgoing_preserved_state);
> > > > > + device_ser->devid = pci_dev_id(pdev);
> > > > > + device_ser->pci_domain = pci_domain_nr(pdev->bus);
> > > > > + device_ser->token = token;
> > > > > +
> > > > > + ret = iommu->iommu_dev->ops->preserve_device(dev, device_ser);
> > > > > + if (ret) {
> > > > > + device_ser->obj.deleted = true;
> > > > > + iommu_unpreserve_locked(iommu->iommu_dev);
> > > > > + return ret;
> > > > > + }
> > > > > +
> > > > > + dev->iommu->device_ser = device_ser;
> > > > > + return 0;
> > > > > +}
> > > > > +
> > > > > +void iommu_unpreserve_device(struct iommu_domain *domain, struct device *dev)
> > > > > +{
> > > > > + struct iommu_lu_flb_obj *flb_obj;
> > > > > + struct device_ser *device_ser;
> > > > > + struct dev_iommu *iommu;
> > > > > + struct pci_dev *pdev;
> > > > > + int ret;
> > > > > +
> > > > > + if (!dev_is_pci(dev))
> > > > > + return;
> > > > > +
> > > > > + pdev = to_pci_dev(dev);
> > > > > + iommu = dev->iommu;
> > > > > + if (!iommu->iommu_dev->ops->unpreserve_device ||
> > > > > + !iommu->iommu_dev->ops->unpreserve)
> > > > > + return;
> > > > > +
> > > > > + ret = liveupdate_flb_get_outgoing(&iommu_flb, (void **)&flb_obj);
> > > > > + if (WARN_ON(ret))
> > > > > + return;
> > > > > +
> > > > > + guard(mutex)(&flb_obj->lock);
> > > > > + device_ser = dev_iommu_preserved_state(dev);
> > > > > + if (WARN_ON(!device_ser))
> > > > > + return;
> > > > > +
> > > > > + iommu->iommu_dev->ops->unpreserve_device(dev, device_ser);
> > > > > + dev->iommu->device_ser = NULL;
> > > > > +
> > > > > + iommu_unpreserve_locked(iommu->iommu_dev);
> > > > > +}
> > > >
> > > > I'm wondering ig we should guard these APIs against accidental or
> > > > potential abuse by other in-kernel drivers. Since the Live Update
> > > > Orchestrator (LUO) is architecturally designed around user-space
> > > > driven sequences (IOCTLs, specific mutex ordering, etc.), for now.
> > > >
> > > > Since the header-file is also under include/linux, we should avoid any
> > > > possibility where we end up having drivers depending on these API.
> > > > We could add a check based on dma owner:
> > > >
> > > > + /* Only devices explicitly claimed by a user-space driver
> > > > + * (VFIO/IOMMUFD) are eligible for Live Update preservation.
> > > > + */
> > > > + if (!iommu_dma_owner_claimed(dev))
> > > > + return -EPERM;
> > > >
> > > > This should ensure we aren't creating 'zombie' preserved states for
> > > > devices not managed by IOMMUFD/VFIO.
> > >
> > > Agreed. I will update this.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > > diff --git a/include/linux/iommu-lu.h b/include/linux/iommu-lu.h
> > > > > index 59095d2f1bb2..48c07514a776 100644
> > > > > --- a/include/linux/iommu-lu.h
> > > > > +++ b/include/linux/iommu-lu.h
> > > > > @@ -8,9 +8,128 @@
> > > > > #ifndef _LINUX_IOMMU_LU_H
> > > > > #define _LINUX_IOMMU_LU_H
> > > > >
> > > > > +#include <linux/device.h>
> > > > > +#include <linux/iommu.h>
> > > > > #include <linux/liveupdate.h>
> > > > > #include <linux/kho/abi/iommu.h>
> > > > >
> > > > > +typedef int (*iommu_preserved_device_iter_fn)(struct device_ser *ser,
> > > > > + void *arg);
> > > > > +#ifdef CONFIG_IOMMU_LIVEUPDATE
> > > > > +static inline void *dev_iommu_preserved_state(struct device *dev)
> > > > > +{
> > > > > + struct device_ser *ser;
> > > > > +
> > > > > + if (!dev->iommu)
> > > > > + return NULL;
> > > > > +
> > > > > + ser = dev->iommu->device_ser;
> > > > > + if (ser && !ser->obj.incoming)
> > > > > + return ser;
> > > > > +
> > > > > + return NULL;
> > > > > +}
> > > > > +
> > > > > +static inline void *dev_iommu_restored_state(struct device *dev)
> > > > > +{
> > > > > + struct device_ser *ser;
> > > > > +
> > > > > + if (!dev->iommu)
> > > > > + return NULL;
> > > > > +
> > > > > + ser = dev->iommu->device_ser;
> > > > > + if (ser && ser->obj.incoming)
> > > > > + return ser;
> > > > > +
> > > > > + return NULL;
> > > > > +}
> > > > > +
> > > > > +static inline void *iommu_domain_restored_state(struct iommu_domain *domain)
> > > > > +{
> > > > > + struct iommu_domain_ser *ser;
> > > > > +
> > > > > + ser = domain->preserved_state;
> > > > > + if (ser && ser->obj.incoming)
> > > > > + return ser;
> > > > > +
> > > > > + return NULL;
> > > > > +}
> > > > > +
> > > > > +static inline int dev_iommu_restore_did(struct device *dev, struct iommu_domain *domain)
> > > > > +{
> > > > > + struct device_ser *ser = dev_iommu_restored_state(dev);
> > > > > +
> > > > > + if (ser && iommu_domain_restored_state(domain))
> > > > > + return ser->domain_iommu_ser.did;
> > > > > +
> > > > > + return -1;
> > > > > +}
> > > > > +
> > > > > +int iommu_for_each_preserved_device(iommu_preserved_device_iter_fn fn,
> > > > > + void *arg);
> > > > > +struct device_ser *iommu_get_device_preserved_data(struct device *dev);
> > > > > +struct iommu_ser *iommu_get_preserved_data(u64 token, enum iommu_lu_type type);
> > > > > +int iommu_domain_preserve(struct iommu_domain *domain, struct iommu_domain_ser **ser);
> > > > > +void iommu_domain_unpreserve(struct iommu_domain *domain);
> > > > > +int iommu_preserve_device(struct iommu_domain *domain,
> > > > > + struct device *dev, u64 token);
> > > > > +void iommu_unpreserve_device(struct iommu_domain *domain, struct device *dev);
> > > > > +#else
> > > > > +static inline void *dev_iommu_preserved_state(struct device *dev)
> > > > > +{
> > > > > + return NULL;
> > > > > +}
> > > > > +
> > > > > +static inline void *dev_iommu_restored_state(struct device *dev)
> > > > > +{
> > > > > + return NULL;
> > > > > +}
> > > > > +
> > > > > +static inline int dev_iommu_restore_did(struct device *dev, struct iommu_domain *domain)
> > > > > +{
> > > > > + return -1;
> > > > > +}
> > > > > +
> > > > > +static inline void *iommu_domain_restored_state(struct iommu_domain *domain)
> > > > > +{
> > > > > + return NULL;
> > > > > +}
> > > > > +
> > > > > +static inline int iommu_for_each_preserved_device(iommu_preserved_device_iter_fn fn, void *arg)
> > > > > +{
> > > > > + return -EOPNOTSUPP;
> > > > > +}
> > > > > +
> > > > > +static inline struct device_ser *iommu_get_device_preserved_data(struct device *dev)
> > > > > +{
> > > > > + return NULL;
> > > > > +}
> > > > > +
> > > > > +static inline struct iommu_ser *iommu_get_preserved_data(u64 token, enum iommu_lu_type type)
> > > > > +{
> > > > > + return NULL;
> > > > > +}
> > > > > +
> > > > > +static inline int iommu_domain_preserve(struct iommu_domain *domain, struct iommu_domain_ser **ser)
> > > > > +{
> > > > > + return -EOPNOTSUPP;
> > > > > +}
> > > > > +
> > > > > +static inline void iommu_domain_unpreserve(struct iommu_domain *domain)
> > > > > +{
> > > > > +}
> > > > > +
> > > > > +static inline int iommu_preserve_device(struct iommu_domain *domain,
> > > > > + struct device *dev, u64 token)
> > > > > +{
> > > > > + return -EOPNOTSUPP;
> > > > > +}
> > > > > +
> > > > > +static inline void iommu_unpreserve_device(struct iommu_domain *domain, struct device *dev)
> > > > > +{
> > > > > +}
> > > > > +#endif
> > > > > +
> > > > > int iommu_liveupdate_register_flb(struct liveupdate_file_handler *handler);
> > > > > int iommu_liveupdate_unregister_flb(struct liveupdate_file_handler *handler);
> > > > >
> > > > > diff --git a/include/linux/iommu.h b/include/linux/iommu.h
> > > > > index 54b8b48c762e..bd949c1ce7c5 100644
> > > > > --- a/include/linux/iommu.h
> > > > > +++ b/include/linux/iommu.h
> > > > > @@ -14,6 +14,8 @@
> > > > > #include <linux/err.h>
> > > > > #include <linux/of.h>
> > > > > #include <linux/iova_bitmap.h>
> > > > > +#include <linux/atomic.h>
> > > > > +#include <linux/kho/abi/iommu.h>
> > > > > #include <uapi/linux/iommufd.h>
> > > > >
> > > > > #define IOMMU_READ (1 << 0)
> > > > > @@ -248,6 +250,10 @@ struct iommu_domain {
> > > > > struct list_head next;
> > > > > };
> > > > > };
> > > > > +
> > > > > +#ifdef CONFIG_IOMMU_LIVEUPDATE
> > > > > + struct iommu_domain_ser *preserved_state;
> > > > > +#endif
> > > > > };
> > > > >
> > > > > static inline bool iommu_is_dma_domain(struct iommu_domain *domain)
> > > > > @@ -647,6 +653,10 @@ __iommu_copy_struct_to_user(const struct iommu_user_data *dst_data,
> > > > > * resources shared/passed to user space IOMMU instance. Associate
> > > > > * it with a nesting @parent_domain. It is required for driver to
> > > > > * set @viommu->ops pointing to its own viommu_ops
> > > > > + * @preserve_device: Preserve state of a device for liveupdate.
> > > > > + * @unpreserve_device: Unpreserve state that was preserved earlier.
> > > > > + * @preserve: Preserve state of iommu translation hardware for liveupdate.
> > > > > + * @unpreserve: Unpreserve state of iommu that was preserved earlier.
> > > > > * @owner: Driver module providing these ops
> > > > > * @identity_domain: An always available, always attachable identity
> > > > > * translation.
> > > > > @@ -703,6 +713,11 @@ struct iommu_ops {
> > > > > struct iommu_domain *parent_domain,
> > > > > const struct iommu_user_data *user_data);
> > > > >
> > > > > + int (*preserve_device)(struct device *dev, struct device_ser *device_ser);
> > > > > + void (*unpreserve_device)(struct device *dev, struct device_ser *device_ser);
> > > >
> > > > Nit: Let's move the _device ops under the comment:
> > > > `/* Per device IOMMU features */`
> > >
> > > I will move these.
> > > >
> > > > > + int (*preserve)(struct iommu_device *iommu, struct iommu_ser *iommu_ser);
> > > > > + void (*unpreserve)(struct iommu_device *iommu, struct iommu_ser *iommu_ser);
> > > > > +
> > > >
> > > > I'm wondering if there's any benefit to add these ops under a #ifdef ?
> > >
> > > These should be NULL when liveupdate is disabled, so #ifdef should not
> > > be needed. Not sure how much space we save if don't define these. I will
> > > move these in #ifdef anyway.
> > > >
> > > > > const struct iommu_domain_ops *default_domain_ops;
> > > > > struct module *owner;
> > > > > struct iommu_domain *identity_domain;
> > > > > @@ -749,6 +764,11 @@ struct iommu_ops {
> > > > > * specific mechanisms.
> > > > > * @set_pgtable_quirks: Set io page table quirks (IO_PGTABLE_QUIRK_*)
> > > > > * @free: Release the domain after use.
> > > > > + * @preserve: Preserve the iommu domain for liveupdate.
> > > > > + * Returns 0 on success, a negative errno on failure.
> > > > > + * @unpreserve: Unpreserve the iommu domain that was preserved earlier.
> > > > > + * @restore: Restore the iommu domain after liveupdate.
> > > > > + * Returns 0 on success, a negative errno on failure.
> > > > > */
> > > > > struct iommu_domain_ops {
> > > > > int (*attach_dev)(struct iommu_domain *domain, struct device *dev,
> > > > > @@ -779,6 +799,9 @@ struct iommu_domain_ops {
> > > > > unsigned long quirks);
> > > > >
> > > > > void (*free)(struct iommu_domain *domain);
> > > > > + int (*preserve)(struct iommu_domain *domain, struct iommu_domain_ser *ser);
> > > > > + void (*unpreserve)(struct iommu_domain *domain, struct iommu_domain_ser *ser);
> > > > > + int (*restore)(struct iommu_domain *domain, struct iommu_domain_ser *ser);
> > > > > };
> > > > >
> > > > > /**
> > > > > @@ -790,6 +813,8 @@ struct iommu_domain_ops {
> > > > > * @singleton_group: Used internally for drivers that have only one group
> > > > > * @max_pasids: number of supported PASIDs
> > > > > * @ready: set once iommu_device_register() has completed successfully
> > > > > + * @outgoing_preserved_state: preserved iommu state of outgoing kernel for
> > > > > + * liveupdate.
> > > > > */
> > > > > struct iommu_device {
> > > > > struct list_head list;
> > > > > @@ -799,6 +824,10 @@ struct iommu_device {
> > > > > struct iommu_group *singleton_group;
> > > > > u32 max_pasids;
> > > > > bool ready;
> > > > > +
> > > > > +#ifdef CONFIG_IOMMU_LIVEUPDATE
> > > > > + struct iommu_ser *outgoing_preserved_state;
> > > > > +#endif
> > > > > };
> > > > >
> > > > > /**
> > > > > @@ -853,6 +882,9 @@ struct dev_iommu {
> > > > > u32 pci_32bit_workaround:1;
> > > > > u32 require_direct:1;
> > > > > u32 shadow_on_flush:1;
> > > > > +#ifdef CONFIG_IOMMU_LIVEUPDATE
> > > > > + struct device_ser *device_ser;
> > > > > +#endif
> > > > > };
> > > > >
> > > > > int iommu_device_register(struct iommu_device *iommu,
> > > >
> > > > Thanks,
> > > > Praan
> > > >
> > > > [1] https://elixir.bootlin.com/linux/v7.0-rc3/source/kernel/liveupdate/kexec_handover.c#L1182
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-03-17 20:23 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 95+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-02-03 22:09 [PATCH 00/14] iommu: Add live update state preservation Samiullah Khawaja
2026-02-03 22:09 ` [PATCH 01/14] iommu: Implement IOMMU LU FLB callbacks Samiullah Khawaja
2026-03-11 21:07 ` Pranjal Shrivastava
2026-03-12 16:43 ` Samiullah Khawaja
2026-03-12 23:43 ` Pranjal Shrivastava
2026-03-13 16:47 ` Samiullah Khawaja
2026-03-13 15:36 ` Pranjal Shrivastava
2026-03-13 16:58 ` Samiullah Khawaja
2026-03-16 22:54 ` Vipin Sharma
2026-03-17 1:06 ` Samiullah Khawaja
2026-03-23 23:27 ` Vipin Sharma
2026-02-03 22:09 ` [PATCH 02/14] iommu: Implement IOMMU core liveupdate skeleton Samiullah Khawaja
2026-03-12 23:10 ` Pranjal Shrivastava
2026-03-13 18:42 ` Samiullah Khawaja
2026-03-17 20:09 ` Pranjal Shrivastava
2026-03-17 20:13 ` Samiullah Khawaja
2026-03-17 20:23 ` Pranjal Shrivastava [this message]
2026-03-17 21:03 ` Vipin Sharma
2026-03-18 18:51 ` Pranjal Shrivastava
2026-03-18 17:49 ` Samiullah Khawaja
2026-03-17 19:58 ` Vipin Sharma
2026-03-17 20:33 ` Samiullah Khawaja
2026-03-24 19:06 ` Vipin Sharma
2026-03-24 19:45 ` Samiullah Khawaja
2026-02-03 22:09 ` [PATCH 03/14] liveupdate: luo_file: Add internal APIs for file preservation Samiullah Khawaja
2026-03-18 10:00 ` Pranjal Shrivastava
2026-03-18 16:54 ` Samiullah Khawaja
2026-02-03 22:09 ` [PATCH 04/14] iommu/pages: Add APIs to preserve/unpreserve/restore iommu pages Samiullah Khawaja
2026-03-03 16:42 ` Ankit Soni
2026-03-03 18:41 ` Samiullah Khawaja
2026-03-20 17:27 ` Pranjal Shrivastava
2026-03-20 18:12 ` Samiullah Khawaja
2026-03-17 20:59 ` Vipin Sharma
2026-03-20 9:28 ` Pranjal Shrivastava
2026-03-20 18:27 ` Samiullah Khawaja
2026-03-20 11:01 ` Pranjal Shrivastava
2026-03-20 18:56 ` Samiullah Khawaja
2026-02-03 22:09 ` [PATCH 05/14] iommupt: Implement preserve/unpreserve/restore callbacks Samiullah Khawaja
2026-03-20 21:57 ` Pranjal Shrivastava
2026-03-23 16:41 ` Samiullah Khawaja
2026-02-03 22:09 ` [PATCH 06/14] iommu/vt-d: Implement device and iommu preserve/unpreserve ops Samiullah Khawaja
2026-03-19 16:04 ` Vipin Sharma
2026-03-19 16:27 ` Samiullah Khawaja
2026-03-20 23:01 ` Pranjal Shrivastava
2026-03-21 13:27 ` Pranjal Shrivastava
2026-03-23 18:32 ` Samiullah Khawaja
2026-02-03 22:09 ` [PATCH 07/14] iommu/vt-d: Restore IOMMU state and reclaimed domain ids Samiullah Khawaja
2026-03-19 20:54 ` Vipin Sharma
2026-03-20 1:05 ` Samiullah Khawaja
2026-03-22 19:51 ` Pranjal Shrivastava
2026-03-23 19:33 ` Samiullah Khawaja
2026-02-03 22:09 ` [PATCH 08/14] iommu: Restore and reattach preserved domains to devices Samiullah Khawaja
2026-03-10 5:16 ` Ankit Soni
2026-03-10 21:47 ` Samiullah Khawaja
2026-03-22 21:59 ` Pranjal Shrivastava
2026-03-23 18:02 ` Samiullah Khawaja
2026-02-03 22:09 ` [PATCH 09/14] iommu/vt-d: preserve PASID table of preserved device Samiullah Khawaja
2026-03-23 18:19 ` Pranjal Shrivastava
2026-03-23 18:51 ` Samiullah Khawaja
2026-02-03 22:09 ` [PATCH 10/14] iommufd-lu: Implement ioctl to let userspace mark an HWPT to be preserved Samiullah Khawaja
2026-03-19 23:35 ` Vipin Sharma
2026-03-20 0:40 ` Samiullah Khawaja
2026-03-20 23:34 ` Vipin Sharma
2026-03-23 16:24 ` Samiullah Khawaja
2026-03-25 14:37 ` Pranjal Shrivastava
2026-03-25 17:31 ` Samiullah Khawaja
2026-03-25 18:55 ` Pranjal Shrivastava
2026-03-25 20:19 ` Samiullah Khawaja
2026-03-25 20:36 ` Pranjal Shrivastava
2026-03-25 20:46 ` Samiullah Khawaja
2026-02-03 22:09 ` [PATCH 11/14] iommufd-lu: Persist iommu hardware pagetables for live update Samiullah Khawaja
2026-02-25 23:47 ` Samiullah Khawaja
2026-03-03 5:56 ` Ankit Soni
2026-03-03 18:51 ` Samiullah Khawaja
2026-03-23 20:28 ` Vipin Sharma
2026-03-23 21:34 ` Samiullah Khawaja
2026-03-25 20:08 ` Pranjal Shrivastava
2026-03-25 20:32 ` Samiullah Khawaja
2026-02-03 22:09 ` [PATCH 12/14] iommufd: Add APIs to preserve/unpreserve a vfio cdev Samiullah Khawaja
2026-03-23 20:59 ` Vipin Sharma
2026-03-23 21:38 ` Samiullah Khawaja
2026-03-25 20:24 ` Pranjal Shrivastava
2026-03-25 20:41 ` Samiullah Khawaja
2026-03-25 21:23 ` Pranjal Shrivastava
2026-03-26 0:16 ` Samiullah Khawaja
2026-02-03 22:09 ` [PATCH 13/14] vfio/pci: Preserve the iommufd state of the " Samiullah Khawaja
2026-02-17 4:18 ` Ankit Soni
2026-03-03 18:35 ` Samiullah Khawaja
2026-03-23 21:17 ` Vipin Sharma
2026-03-23 22:07 ` Samiullah Khawaja
2026-03-24 20:30 ` Vipin Sharma
2026-03-25 20:55 ` Pranjal Shrivastava
2026-02-03 22:09 ` [PATCH 14/14] iommufd/selftest: Add test to verify iommufd preservation Samiullah Khawaja
2026-03-23 22:18 ` Vipin Sharma
2026-03-25 21:05 ` Pranjal Shrivastava
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=abm4ShqPTxIujDlt@google.com \
--to=praan@google.com \
--cc=ajayachandra@nvidia.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=alex@shazbot.org \
--cc=baolu.lu@linux.intel.com \
--cc=chrisl@kernel.org \
--cc=dmatlack@google.com \
--cc=dwmw2@infradead.org \
--cc=iommu@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=jgg@ziepe.ca \
--cc=joro@8bytes.org \
--cc=kevin.tian@intel.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=leonro@nvidia.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=parav@nvidia.com \
--cc=pasha.tatashin@soleen.com \
--cc=pratyush@kernel.org \
--cc=robin.murphy@arm.com \
--cc=saeedm@nvidia.com \
--cc=shuah@kernel.org \
--cc=skhawaja@google.com \
--cc=vipinsh@google.com \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
--cc=witu@nvidia.com \
--cc=zhuyifei@google.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox