From: torvalds@transmeta.com (Linus Torvalds)
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] IDE PIO write Fix #2
Date: Tue, 14 May 2002 19:29:35 +0000 (UTC) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <abroiv$ifs$1@penguin.transmeta.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <3CE0795B.62C956F0@cinet.co.jp> <3CE0D6DE.8090407@evision-ventures.com>
In article <3CE0D6DE.8090407@evision-ventures.com>,
Martin Dalecki <dalecki@evision-ventures.com> wrote:
>>
>> --- linux-2.5.15/drivers/ide/ide-taskfile.c.orig Fri May 10 11:49:35 2002
>> +++ linux-2.5.15/drivers/ide/ide-taskfile.c Tue May 14 10:40:43 2002
>> @@ -606,7 +606,7 @@
>> if (!ide_end_request(drive, rq, 1))
>> return ide_stopped;
>>
>> - if ((rq->current_nr_sectors==1) ^ (stat & DRQ_STAT)) {
>> + if ((rq->nr_sectors == 1) ^ ((stat & DRQ_STAT) != 0)) {
Well, that's definitely an improvement - the original code makes no
sense at all, since it's doing a bitwise xor on two bits that are not
the same, and then uses that as a boolean value.
Your change at least makes it use the bitwise xor on properly logical
values, making the bitwise xor work as a _logical_ xor.
Although at that point I'd just get rid of the xor, and replace it by
the "!=" operation - which is equivalent on logical ops.
>> pBuf = ide_map_rq(rq, &flags);
>> DTF("write: %p, rq->current_nr_sectors: %d\n", pBuf, (int) rq->current_nr_sectors);
>
>
>Hmm. There is something else that smells in the above, since the XOR operator
>doesn't seem to be proper. Why shouldn't we get DRQ_STAT at all on short
>request? Could you perhaps just try to replace it with an OR?
The XOR operation is a valid op, if you just use it on valid values,
which the patch does seem to make it do.
I don't know whether the logic is _correct_ after that, but at least
there is some remote chance that it might make sense.
Linus
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2002-05-14 19:30 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2002-05-14 2:41 [PATCH] IDE PIO write Fix #2 tomita
2002-05-14 9:20 ` Martin Dalecki
2002-05-14 19:29 ` Linus Torvalds [this message]
2002-05-15 5:47 ` Andre Hedrick
2002-05-15 9:47 ` Martin Dalecki
2002-05-17 19:24 ` Gunther Mayer
2002-05-20 1:41 ` Andre Hedrick
2002-05-20 6:48 ` Gunther Mayer
2002-05-20 20:26 ` Andre Hedrick
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='abroiv$ifs$1@penguin.transmeta.com' \
--to=torvalds@transmeta.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox