public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Hangbin Liu <liuhangbin@gmail.com>
To: Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>
Cc: Jay Vosburgh <jv@jvosburgh.net>,
	Andrew Lunn <andrew+netdev@lunn.ch>,
	"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
	Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>,
	Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>, Jiri Pirko <jiri@resnulli.us>,
	Nikolay Aleksandrov <razor@blackwall.org>,
	Ido Schimmel <idosch@nvidia.com>, Simon Horman <horms@kernel.org>,
	Sabrina Dubroca <sd@queasysnail.net>,
	Sridhar Samudrala <sridhar.samudrala@intel.com>,
	netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	bridge@lists.linux.dev
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v3 0/5] net: centralize master device offload feature computation
Date: Thu, 19 Mar 2026 13:37:17 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <abv8DXkR0RtnZJ8P@fedora> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <337a938c-8a03-43f8-8402-745020185b37@redhat.com>

On Thu, Mar 19, 2026 at 10:52:34AM +0100, Paolo Abeni wrote:
> I'm sorry for the late feedback, but I think the driver cleanup and
> simplification is not worthy the core complexity and the new NDO added.
> 
> The AI reported issue would probably need very non trivial changes to
> both team and bond driver to be addressed.
> 
> Most of the cleanups belong to netdev_compute_master_upper_features()
> introduction in the failover driver. Factoring out that single change
> would be IMHO a better option, if possible.
> 
> The new ndo looks controversial. We already have 2 different ndo at
> __netdev_update_features() time, with slightly different semantic.
> Adding another one feels like a design issue.

Thanks, I will check if we can call netdev_compute_master_upper_features()
in failover driver directly.

Hangbin

  reply	other threads:[~2026-03-19 13:37 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-03-16  4:26 [PATCH net-next v3 0/5] net: centralize master device offload feature computation Hangbin Liu
2026-03-16  4:26 ` [PATCH net-next v3 1/5] net: add ndo_update_offloads for offload computation Hangbin Liu
2026-03-17 15:14   ` Sabrina Dubroca
2026-03-18  1:15     ` Hangbin Liu
2026-03-18 23:29       ` Sabrina Dubroca
2026-03-19  2:02         ` Hangbin Liu
2026-03-16  4:26 ` [PATCH net-next v3 2/5] net: use ndo_update_offloads to set offload features for bonding/bridge/team Hangbin Liu
2026-03-19  9:16   ` [net-next,v3,2/5] " Paolo Abeni
2026-03-16  4:26 ` [PATCH net-next v3 3/5] macsec: move netdev_upper_dev_link() after macsec_changelink_common() Hangbin Liu
2026-03-17 11:58   ` Sabrina Dubroca
2026-03-16  4:26 ` [PATCH net-next v3 4/5] failover: use ndo_update_offloads for failover offload compute Hangbin Liu
2026-03-16  4:26 ` [PATCH net-next v3 5/5] net: no need to disable LRO specifically Hangbin Liu
2026-03-19  9:52 ` [PATCH net-next v3 0/5] net: centralize master device offload feature computation Paolo Abeni
2026-03-19 13:37   ` Hangbin Liu [this message]
2026-03-19 16:01   ` Jakub Kicinski

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=abv8DXkR0RtnZJ8P@fedora \
    --to=liuhangbin@gmail.com \
    --cc=andrew+netdev@lunn.ch \
    --cc=bridge@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=edumazet@google.com \
    --cc=horms@kernel.org \
    --cc=idosch@nvidia.com \
    --cc=jiri@resnulli.us \
    --cc=jv@jvosburgh.net \
    --cc=kuba@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
    --cc=razor@blackwall.org \
    --cc=sd@queasysnail.net \
    --cc=sridhar.samudrala@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox