From: Petr Mladek <pmladek@suse.com>
To: John Ogness <john.ogness@linutronix.de>
Cc: Jianzhou Zhao <luckd0g@163.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, senozhatsky@chromium.org,
rostedt@goodmis.org
Subject: Re: KCSAN: data-race in desc_read / prb_reserve_in_last
Date: Thu, 19 Mar 2026 12:17:04 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <abvbMEbvL9wm_xFq@pathway.suse.cz> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87ikazitc4.fsf@jogness.linutronix.de>
On Fri 2026-03-13 17:37:55, John Ogness wrote:
> Hi Petr,
>
> On 2026-03-12, Petr Mladek <pmladek@suse.com> wrote:
> > [rfc v2]:
> >
> > diff --git a/kernel/printk/printk_ringbuffer.c b/kernel/printk/printk_ringbuffer.c
> > index 56c8e3d031f4..c080edf5636a 100644
> > --- a/kernel/printk/printk_ringbuffer.c
> > +++ b/kernel/printk/printk_ringbuffer.c
> > @@ -454,11 +454,12 @@ static enum desc_state desc_read(struct prb_desc_ring *desc_ring,
> > struct printk_info *info = to_info(desc_ring, id);
> > struct prb_desc *desc = to_desc(desc_ring, id);
> > atomic_long_t *state_var = &desc->state_var;
> > + unsigned long state_val, state_val_check;
> > enum desc_state d_state;
> > - unsigned long state_val;
> >
> > /* Check the descriptor state. */
> > state_val = atomic_long_read(state_var); /* LMM(desc_read:A) */
> > +try_again:
> > d_state = get_desc_state(id, state_val);
> > if (d_state == desc_miss || d_state == desc_reserved) {
> > /*
> > @@ -466,7 +467,9 @@ static enum desc_state desc_read(struct prb_desc_ring *desc_ring,
> > * @state_var so that the caller can see the details of
> > * the inconsistent state.
> > */
> > - goto out;
> > + if (desc_out)
> > + atomic_long_set(&desc_out->state_var, state_val);
> > + return d_state;
>
> I would keep the "goto out" so that the success scenario can also set
> the state_var of @desc_out.
You are right.
> > }
> >
> > /*
> > @@ -542,14 +545,19 @@ static enum desc_state desc_read(struct prb_desc_ring *desc_ring,
> > smp_rmb(); /* LMM(desc_read:D) */
> >
> > /*
> > - * The data has been copied. Return the current descriptor state,
> > - * which may have changed since the load above.
> > + * The data has been copied. Make sure that they match the given @id
> > + * and @d_state read at the beginning. Re-read them otherwise.
> > + *
> > + * Note that this simplifies the logic. Especially, the reader API
> > + * expects that all values are stable when the record is finalized.
> > + * But they are stable only when it stays finalized all the time.
> > */
> > - state_val = atomic_long_read(state_var); /* LMM(desc_read:E) */
> > - d_state = get_desc_state(id, state_val);
> > -out:
> > - if (desc_out)
> > - atomic_long_set(&desc_out->state_var, state_val);
> > + state_val_check = atomic_long_read(state_var); /* LMM(desc_read:E) */
> > + if (state_val_check != state_val) {
> > + state_val = state_val_check;
> > + goto try_again;
> > + }
> > +
>
> The out label and code could stay as it was. Or is there some reason you
> do not want to set the state_var in the success case?
It was a mistake. I was confused by the following code:
/*
* Copy the descriptor data. The data is not valid until the
* state has been re-checked. A memcpy() for all of @desc
* cannot be used because of the atomic_t @state_var field.
*/
if (desc_out) {
memcpy(&desc_out->text_blk_lpos, &desc->text_blk_lpos,
sizeof(desc_out->text_blk_lpos)); /* LMM(desc_read:C) */
}
I somehow assumed that the memcpy copied everything. And we will not
longer need to update state_var when state_val did not change.
But the code copies only text_blk_lpos.
/o\
I am going to send a proper patch where this will be fixed.
> out:
> if (desc_out)
> atomic_long_set(&desc_out->state_var, state_val);
>
> > return d_state;
> > }
>
> We should probably annotate the memcpy() with a wrapping
> data_race(). Sadly we were aware of and expected the data race, but did
> not realize that commit 4cfc7258f876 ("printk: ringbuffer: add
> finalization/extension support") made the data race a problem.
Yup. I'll add the data_race() as well.
Thanks a lot for review.
Best Regards,
Petr
prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-03-19 11:17 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-03-11 3:31 KCSAN: data-race in desc_read / prb_reserve_in_last Jianzhou Zhao
2026-03-11 13:27 ` Petr Mladek
2026-03-12 11:17 ` Petr Mladek
2026-03-13 16:31 ` John Ogness
2026-03-19 11:17 ` Petr Mladek [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=abvbMEbvL9wm_xFq@pathway.suse.cz \
--to=pmladek@suse.com \
--cc=john.ogness@linutronix.de \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=luckd0g@163.com \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=senozhatsky@chromium.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox