From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mgamail.intel.com (mgamail.intel.com [198.175.65.21]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9301C1DDA17; Thu, 16 Jan 2025 16:02:54 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=198.175.65.21 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1737043376; cv=none; b=SLo56fqteDkx7K6vSylMcIc89oMgnskPUnIGSHddfAeK3bXbfLA1DxVCza5Z2KWNQJsVyjrTUoUFLrvhrCXrSSoRrwzhfgM2xFYv+SznWDjuXq6xHi7fch11OzqJcbe65PTeBZuIL2GxibMO5eoEFjvyhv+t3c4ld1/7YhWcMVE= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1737043376; c=relaxed/simple; bh=97p9b3mdL471MSKShwjo981bCu/leHm7j8x2aNa/8bE=; h=Message-ID:Date:MIME-Version:Subject:To:Cc:References:From: In-Reply-To:Content-Type; b=f6W+E1+IONFoTYmi/1p944tAKin8k+4D5IHm80PmA/yTf+Edg3PRgRjFY+DE/MfDK+BQGYVG6faU9u/hFU035ux+tu2XUKoe/lHY6843ngQqBdAkXu7AN1ByDnJ6bBpblOMd6X+AYO8zii/tGSlV6LBVIzhx7POMRl0Tucly83Q= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux.intel.com; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=linux.intel.com; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=intel.com header.i=@intel.com header.b=g6MBb8vi; arc=none smtp.client-ip=198.175.65.21 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux.intel.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=linux.intel.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=intel.com header.i=@intel.com header.b="g6MBb8vi" DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=intel.com; i=@intel.com; q=dns/txt; s=Intel; t=1737043375; x=1768579375; h=message-id:date:mime-version:subject:to:cc:references: from:in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding; bh=97p9b3mdL471MSKShwjo981bCu/leHm7j8x2aNa/8bE=; b=g6MBb8viVIetYi9naWHu9aI7Z1jevWlZS7QBdkT021kfV+BFLqKHYsFi ihi+qtogqAUsg5AjZl7zY5F7iigB3xkDFGTggryTh8SAd+bIezFAEtfgC rjiFCEu8SE7n3ma1efaqBp78sOm/xBnCgMoeAv/7wo7toQbrkaXitsp/0 mMyezg3xGo0MPzvTQeXqqa2f5zWyLjYmBGweGAIg/qqdKv2zX0929YD+3 TvbJ3tOh9WZKzRd4k005NM65hIQjDpA0q5UM0ChWHAcQa7Yk5c4Y9rJ8c X8+RSgTC97RdyqWXax5OgX2GtytT9e/0eFFFM6i1c9HMXxx4vx2i5/sFE A==; X-CSE-ConnectionGUID: gz3kPbxTTomD2GCw9C2PDA== X-CSE-MsgGUID: bzDgz2ibRvKjqiIsUkBMsg== X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6700,10204,11317"; a="37322375" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.13,209,1732608000"; d="scan'208";a="37322375" Received: from orviesa010.jf.intel.com ([10.64.159.150]) by orvoesa113.jf.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 16 Jan 2025 08:02:54 -0800 X-CSE-ConnectionGUID: KN2BIi2GR5WoiJSewcaJXw== X-CSE-MsgGUID: 22NScDJrTj2Bm1TWvLAm1g== X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.12,224,1728975600"; d="scan'208";a="105388009" Received: from bergbenj-mobl1.ger.corp.intel.com (HELO [10.245.245.105]) ([10.245.245.105]) by orviesa010-auth.jf.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 16 Jan 2025 08:02:51 -0800 Message-ID: Date: Thu, 16 Jan 2025 17:02:38 +0100 Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Subject: Re: [PATCH v9 0/4] SRF: Fix offline CPU preventing pc6 entry To: Artem Bityutskiy , Dave Hansen , x86@kernel.org Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-pm@vger.kernel.org, rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com, len.brown@intel.com, dave.hansen@linux.intel.com References: <20250110115953.6058-1-patryk.wlazlyn@linux.intel.com> <5f24fe01b6dd0ae0e6d91209e143f2faff6ae017.camel@linux.intel.com> <860da841-fa82-4984-9e34-fba02e7aa556@intel.com> Content-Language: en-US From: Patryk Wlazlyn In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit > * Because version 6.12 is LTS, there is a good chance that users of near-future > new platforms will run 6.12 on them. > * If a near-future platform happens to miss the firmware workaround for this > issue, having these patches in 6.12 will likely mean that most users are OK. Make sense to me. Any objections to adding "Cc stable v6.12"?