* [BUG] bpf: kprobe_multi allows BPF_F_SLEEPABLE programs, causing sleeping-in-atomic splat
@ 2026-04-01 13:44 Varun R Mallya
2026-04-01 13:49 ` [PATCH bpf] bpf: Reject sleepable kprobe_multi programs at attach time Varun R Mallya
2026-04-01 16:25 ` [PATCH bpf v2] " Varun R Mallya
0 siblings, 2 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Varun R Mallya @ 2026-04-01 13:44 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: bpf
Cc: linux-kernel, kpsingh, mattbobrowski, ast, daniel, andrii,
martin.lau, eddyz87, memxor, song, yonghong.song, jolsa, rostedt,
mhiramat, mathieu.desnoyers, linux-trace-kernel
Hi,
I found a bug in the kprobe_multi BPF link creation path where the kernel
fails to reject programs with BPF_F_SLEEPABLE set.
kprobe.multi programs run in an atomic/RCU context and cannot sleep.
However, bpf_link_create() with BPF_TRACE_KPROBE_MULTI does not validate
whether the program being attached has BPF_F_SLEEPABLE set. This allows
sleepable helpers such as bpf_copy_from_user() to be invoked from a
non-sleepable context, triggering a "sleeping function called from invalid
context" splat.
Reproducer:
/* crash.bpf.c */
SEC("kprobe.multi")
int handle_kprobe_multi_crash(struct pt_regs *ctx)
{
char buf[16];
int ret;
ret = bpf_copy_from_user(buf, sizeof(buf), (void *)ctx->sp);
bpf_printk("bpf_copy_from_user ret: %d\n", ret);
return 0;
}
/* loader: manually set BPF_F_SLEEPABLE before load, then attach via
bpf_link_create() with BPF_TRACE_KPROBE_MULTI */
bpf_program__set_flags(prog, BPF_F_SLEEPABLE);
Kernel output (bpf-next 7.0.0-rc5+):
[ 483.577248] BUG: sleeping function called from invalid context at ./include/linux/uaccess.h:
169
[ 483.577364] in_atomic(): 1, irqs_disabled(): 0, non_block: 0, pid: 1787, name: sudo
[ 483.577420] preempt_count: 1, expected: 0
[ 483.577453] RCU nest depth: 2, expected: 0
[ 483.577486] INFO: lockdep is turned off.
Attachment successful! The bug is confirmed.
Check 'sudo dmesg -w' for BPF prints and warnings.
Triggering v[ 483.577569] CfsPU: 7 UID: 0 PID: 1787 Comm: sudo Tainted: G W _
rea7.0.0-rc5+ #4 PREEMPT(full)
d[ 483.577571] T.ainted: [W]=WARN..
Su[ 483.577572] Hrvardware name: Bochs Bochs, BIOS iBochs 01/01/2011v
[ 483.577573] Call Trace:
[ 483.577575] e<TASK>
[ 483.577578] d!dump_stack_lvl+0x54/0x70
[ 483.577582] If __might_resched+b0x200/0x220
p[ 483.577585] f__might_fault+0x_c2c/0x80
o[ 483.577587] p_copy_from_user+y0x23/0x80
_[ 483.577591] bpf_copy_from_user+0x27/0x50
[ 483.577594] fbpf_prog_1906cf6roa66546b5e_handlem__kprobe_multi_crash+0x33/0x4d
u[ 483.577596] skprobe_multi_linek_handler+0x15d/r re0x260
[ 483.577599] t? kprobe_multi_lurink_handler+0x99n/0x260
[ 483.577602] e? __pfx_vfs_readd +0x10/0x10
0[ 483.577604] in? ksys_read+0x7c/0x100
[ 483.577605] dm? vfs_read+0x4/0esg, x360
t[ 483.577607] fprobe_ftrace_entry+0x3b8/0x480
[ 483.577609] h? ksys_read+0x7ce /0x100
e[ 483.577610] x? fprobe_ftrace_pentry+0x93/0x480l
o[ 483.577612] it? lock_release+0x42/0x330
[ 483.577615] ? vfs_read+0x9/0wx360
o[ 483.577616] r? __x64_sys_rt_sigaction+0xde/0xke120
[ 483.577619] ? vfs_read+0x9/0x360
[ 483.577620] d? ksys_read+0x7c./0x100
[ 483.577622]
? do_syscall_64+0x143/0xf80
[ 483.577624] ? entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x77/0x7f
[ 483.577625] ? trace_irq_disable+0x1d/0xc0
[ 483.577627] ? entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x77/0x7f
[ 483.577631] </TASK>
I am sending in a patch that fixes this.
Signed-off-by: Varun R Mallya <varunrmallya@gmail.com>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* [PATCH bpf] bpf: Reject sleepable kprobe_multi programs at attach time
2026-04-01 13:44 [BUG] bpf: kprobe_multi allows BPF_F_SLEEPABLE programs, causing sleeping-in-atomic splat Varun R Mallya
@ 2026-04-01 13:49 ` Varun R Mallya
2026-04-01 14:08 ` Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi
2026-04-01 16:25 ` [PATCH bpf v2] " Varun R Mallya
1 sibling, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: Varun R Mallya @ 2026-04-01 13:49 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: varunrmallya
Cc: andrii, ast, bpf, daniel, eddyz87, jolsa, kpsingh, linux-kernel,
linux-trace-kernel, martin.lau, mathieu.desnoyers, mattbobrowski,
memxor, mhiramat, rostedt, song, yonghong.song
kprobe.multi programs run in atomic/RCU context and cannot sleep.
However, bpf_kprobe_multi_link_attach() did not validate whether the
program being attached had the sleepable flag set, allowing sleepable
helpers such as bpf_copy_from_user() to be invoked from a non-sleepable
context.
This causes a "sleeping function called from invalid context" splat:
BUG: sleeping function called from invalid context at ./include/linux/uaccess.h:169
in_atomic(): 1, irqs_disabled(): 0, non_block: 0, pid: 1787, name: sudo
preempt_count: 1, expected: 0
RCU nest depth: 2, expected: 0
Fix this by rejecting sleepable programs early in
bpf_kprobe_multi_link_attach(), before any further processing.
Fixes: 0dcac272540613d41c05e89679e4ddb978b612f1 ("bpf: Add multi kprobe link")
Signed-off-by: Varun R Mallya <varunrmallya@gmail.com>
---
kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c | 4 ++++
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)
diff --git a/kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c b/kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c
index 0b040a417442..af7079aa0f36 100644
--- a/kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c
+++ b/kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c
@@ -2752,6 +2752,10 @@ int bpf_kprobe_multi_link_attach(const union bpf_attr *attr, struct bpf_prog *pr
if (!is_kprobe_multi(prog))
return -EINVAL;
+ /* kprobe_multi is not allowed to be sleepable. */
+ if (prog->sleepable)
+ return -EINVAL;
+
/* Writing to context is not allowed for kprobes. */
if (prog->aux->kprobe_write_ctx)
return -EINVAL;
--
2.53.0
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH bpf] bpf: Reject sleepable kprobe_multi programs at attach time
2026-04-01 13:49 ` [PATCH bpf] bpf: Reject sleepable kprobe_multi programs at attach time Varun R Mallya
@ 2026-04-01 14:08 ` Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi
2026-04-01 14:42 ` Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi
0 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi @ 2026-04-01 14:08 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Varun R Mallya, jolsa
Cc: andrii, ast, bpf, daniel, eddyz87, kpsingh, linux-kernel,
linux-trace-kernel, martin.lau, mathieu.desnoyers, mattbobrowski,
mhiramat, rostedt, song, yonghong.song
On Wed, 1 Apr 2026 at 15:49, Varun R Mallya <varunrmallya@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> kprobe.multi programs run in atomic/RCU context and cannot sleep.
> However, bpf_kprobe_multi_link_attach() did not validate whether the
> program being attached had the sleepable flag set, allowing sleepable
> helpers such as bpf_copy_from_user() to be invoked from a non-sleepable
> context.
>
> This causes a "sleeping function called from invalid context" splat:
>
> BUG: sleeping function called from invalid context at ./include/linux/uaccess.h:169
> in_atomic(): 1, irqs_disabled(): 0, non_block: 0, pid: 1787, name: sudo
> preempt_count: 1, expected: 0
> RCU nest depth: 2, expected: 0
>
> Fix this by rejecting sleepable programs early in
> bpf_kprobe_multi_link_attach(), before any further processing.
>
> Fixes: 0dcac272540613d41c05e89679e4ddb978b612f1 ("bpf: Add multi kprobe link")
Please use the right format.
Fixes: 0dcac2725406 ("bpf: Add multi kprobe link")
You can add the follow to your .gitconfig to generate the fixes tag.
[alias]
fixes = log -1 --format='Fixes: %h (\"%s\")'
> Signed-off-by: Varun R Mallya <varunrmallya@gmail.com>
> ---
> kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c | 4 ++++
> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c b/kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c
> index 0b040a417442..af7079aa0f36 100644
> --- a/kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c
> +++ b/kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c
> @@ -2752,6 +2752,10 @@ int bpf_kprobe_multi_link_attach(const union bpf_attr *attr, struct bpf_prog *pr
> if (!is_kprobe_multi(prog))
> return -EINVAL;
>
> + /* kprobe_multi is not allowed to be sleepable. */
> + if (prog->sleepable)
> + return -EINVAL;
> +
Looks ok to me, Jiri, could you also take a look?
> /* Writing to context is not allowed for kprobes. */
> if (prog->aux->kprobe_write_ctx)
> return -EINVAL;
> --
> 2.53.0
>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH bpf] bpf: Reject sleepable kprobe_multi programs at attach time
2026-04-01 14:08 ` Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi
@ 2026-04-01 14:42 ` Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi
0 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi @ 2026-04-01 14:42 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Varun R Mallya, jolsa
Cc: andrii, ast, bpf, daniel, eddyz87, kpsingh, linux-kernel,
linux-trace-kernel, martin.lau, mathieu.desnoyers, mattbobrowski,
mhiramat, rostedt, song, yonghong.song
On Wed, 1 Apr 2026 at 16:08, Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi <memxor@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> On Wed, 1 Apr 2026 at 15:49, Varun R Mallya <varunrmallya@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > kprobe.multi programs run in atomic/RCU context and cannot sleep.
> > However, bpf_kprobe_multi_link_attach() did not validate whether the
> > program being attached had the sleepable flag set, allowing sleepable
> > helpers such as bpf_copy_from_user() to be invoked from a non-sleepable
> > context.
> >
> > This causes a "sleeping function called from invalid context" splat:
> >
> > BUG: sleeping function called from invalid context at ./include/linux/uaccess.h:169
> > in_atomic(): 1, irqs_disabled(): 0, non_block: 0, pid: 1787, name: sudo
> > preempt_count: 1, expected: 0
> > RCU nest depth: 2, expected: 0
> >
> > Fix this by rejecting sleepable programs early in
> > bpf_kprobe_multi_link_attach(), before any further processing.
> >
> > Fixes: 0dcac272540613d41c05e89679e4ddb978b612f1 ("bpf: Add multi kprobe link")
>
> Please use the right format.
> Fixes: 0dcac2725406 ("bpf: Add multi kprobe link")
>
> You can add the follow to your .gitconfig to generate the fixes tag.
> [alias]
> fixes = log -1 --format='Fixes: %h (\"%s\")'
>
> > Signed-off-by: Varun R Mallya <varunrmallya@gmail.com>
> > ---
> > kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c | 4 ++++
> > 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)
> >
> > diff --git a/kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c b/kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c
> > index 0b040a417442..af7079aa0f36 100644
> > --- a/kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c
> > +++ b/kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c
> > @@ -2752,6 +2752,10 @@ int bpf_kprobe_multi_link_attach(const union bpf_attr *attr, struct bpf_prog *pr
> > if (!is_kprobe_multi(prog))
> > return -EINVAL;
> >
> > + /* kprobe_multi is not allowed to be sleepable. */
> > + if (prog->sleepable)
> > + return -EINVAL;
> > +
>
> Looks ok to me, Jiri, could you also take a look?
>
> > /* Writing to context is not allowed for kprobes. */
> > if (prog->aux->kprobe_write_ctx)
> > return -EINVAL;
> > --
> > 2.53.0
> >
Also, please add a selftest.
pw-bot: cr
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* [PATCH bpf v2] bpf: Reject sleepable kprobe_multi programs at attach time
2026-04-01 13:44 [BUG] bpf: kprobe_multi allows BPF_F_SLEEPABLE programs, causing sleeping-in-atomic splat Varun R Mallya
2026-04-01 13:49 ` [PATCH bpf] bpf: Reject sleepable kprobe_multi programs at attach time Varun R Mallya
@ 2026-04-01 16:25 ` Varun R Mallya
2026-04-01 16:31 ` Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi
1 sibling, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: Varun R Mallya @ 2026-04-01 16:25 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: varunrmallya
Cc: andrii, ast, bpf, daniel, eddyz87, jolsa, kpsingh, linux-kernel,
linux-trace-kernel, martin.lau, mathieu.desnoyers, mattbobrowski,
memxor, mhiramat, rostedt, song, yonghong.song
kprobe.multi programs run in atomic/RCU context and cannot sleep.
However, bpf_kprobe_multi_link_attach() did not validate whether the
program being attached had the sleepable flag set, allowing sleepable
helpers such as bpf_copy_from_user() to be invoked from a non-sleepable
context.
This causes a "sleeping function called from invalid context" splat:
BUG: sleeping function called from invalid context at ./include/linux/uaccess.h:169
in_atomic(): 1, irqs_disabled(): 0, non_block: 0, pid: 1787, name: sudo
preempt_count: 1, expected: 0
RCU nest depth: 2, expected: 0
Fix this by rejecting sleepable programs early in
bpf_kprobe_multi_link_attach(), before any further processing.
Also add a selftest that tries to load a sleepable kprobe_multi program
and it needs to be rejected for the test to pass.
Fixes: 0dcac2725406 ("bpf: Add multi kprobe link")
Signed-off-by: Varun R Mallya <varunrmallya@gmail.com>
---
kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c | 4 ++
.../bpf/prog_tests/kprobe_multi_test.c | 41 +++++++++++++++++++
.../bpf/progs/kprobe_multi_sleepable.c | 13 ++++++
3 files changed, 58 insertions(+)
create mode 100644 tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/kprobe_multi_sleepable.c
diff --git a/kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c b/kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c
index 0b040a417442..af7079aa0f36 100644
--- a/kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c
+++ b/kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c
@@ -2752,6 +2752,10 @@ int bpf_kprobe_multi_link_attach(const union bpf_attr *attr, struct bpf_prog *pr
if (!is_kprobe_multi(prog))
return -EINVAL;
+ /* kprobe_multi is not allowed to be sleepable. */
+ if (prog->sleepable)
+ return -EINVAL;
+
/* Writing to context is not allowed for kprobes. */
if (prog->aux->kprobe_write_ctx)
return -EINVAL;
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/kprobe_multi_test.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/kprobe_multi_test.c
index 78c974d4ea33..f02fec2b6fda 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/kprobe_multi_test.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/kprobe_multi_test.c
@@ -10,6 +10,7 @@
#include "kprobe_multi_session_cookie.skel.h"
#include "kprobe_multi_verifier.skel.h"
#include "kprobe_write_ctx.skel.h"
+#include "kprobe_multi_sleepable.skel.h"
#include "bpf/libbpf_internal.h"
#include "bpf/hashmap.h"
@@ -633,6 +634,44 @@ static void test_attach_write_ctx(void)
}
#endif
+static void test_attach_multi_sleepable(void)
+{
+ struct kprobe_multi_sleepable *skel;
+ int err;
+
+ skel = kprobe_multi_sleepable__open();
+ if (!ASSERT_OK_PTR(skel, "kprobe_multi_sleepable__open"))
+ return;
+
+ err = bpf_program__set_flags(skel->progs.handle_kprobe_multi_sleepable,
+ BPF_F_SLEEPABLE);
+ if (!ASSERT_OK(err, "bpf_program__set_flags"))
+ goto cleanup;
+
+ /* Load should succeed even with BPF_F_SLEEPABLE for KPROBE types */
+ err = kprobe_multi_sleepable__load(skel);
+ if (!ASSERT_OK(err, "kprobe_multi_sleepable__load"))
+ goto cleanup;
+
+ /* Attachment must fail for kprobe.multi + BPF_F_SLEEPABLE.
+ * Also chosen a stable symbol to send into opts
+ */
+ LIBBPF_OPTS(bpf_kprobe_multi_opts, opts);
+ const char *sym = "vfs_read";
+
+ opts.syms = &sym;
+ opts.cnt = 1;
+
+ skel->links.handle_kprobe_multi_sleepable =
+ bpf_program__attach_kprobe_multi_opts(skel->progs.handle_kprobe_multi_sleepable,
+ NULL, &opts);
+ ASSERT_ERR_PTR(skel->links.handle_kprobe_multi_sleepable,
+ "bpf_program__attach_kprobe_multi_opts");
+
+cleanup:
+ kprobe_multi_sleepable__destroy(skel);
+}
+
void serial_test_kprobe_multi_bench_attach(void)
{
if (test__start_subtest("kernel"))
@@ -676,5 +715,7 @@ void test_kprobe_multi_test(void)
test_unique_match();
if (test__start_subtest("attach_write_ctx"))
test_attach_write_ctx();
+ if (test__start_subtest("attach_multi_sleepable"))
+ test_attach_multi_sleepable();
RUN_TESTS(kprobe_multi_verifier);
}
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/kprobe_multi_sleepable.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/kprobe_multi_sleepable.c
new file mode 100644
index 000000000000..56973ad8779d
--- /dev/null
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/kprobe_multi_sleepable.c
@@ -0,0 +1,13 @@
+// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
+
+#include "vmlinux.h"
+#include <bpf/bpf_helpers.h>
+#include <bpf/bpf_tracing.h>
+
+SEC("kprobe.multi")
+int handle_kprobe_multi_sleepable(struct pt_regs *ctx)
+{
+ return 0;
+}
+
+char _license[] SEC("license") = "GPL";
--
2.53.0
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH bpf v2] bpf: Reject sleepable kprobe_multi programs at attach time
2026-04-01 16:25 ` [PATCH bpf v2] " Varun R Mallya
@ 2026-04-01 16:31 ` Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi
0 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi @ 2026-04-01 16:31 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Varun R Mallya
Cc: andrii, ast, bpf, daniel, eddyz87, jolsa, kpsingh, linux-kernel,
linux-trace-kernel, martin.lau, mathieu.desnoyers, mattbobrowski,
mhiramat, rostedt, song, yonghong.song
On Wed, 1 Apr 2026 at 18:26, Varun R Mallya <varunrmallya@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> kprobe.multi programs run in atomic/RCU context and cannot sleep.
> However, bpf_kprobe_multi_link_attach() did not validate whether the
> program being attached had the sleepable flag set, allowing sleepable
> helpers such as bpf_copy_from_user() to be invoked from a non-sleepable
> context.
>
> This causes a "sleeping function called from invalid context" splat:
>
> BUG: sleeping function called from invalid context at ./include/linux/uaccess.h:169
> in_atomic(): 1, irqs_disabled(): 0, non_block: 0, pid: 1787, name: sudo
> preempt_count: 1, expected: 0
> RCU nest depth: 2, expected: 0
>
> Fix this by rejecting sleepable programs early in
> bpf_kprobe_multi_link_attach(), before any further processing.
>
> Also add a selftest that tries to load a sleepable kprobe_multi program
> and it needs to be rejected for the test to pass.
>
> Fixes: 0dcac2725406 ("bpf: Add multi kprobe link")
> Signed-off-by: Varun R Mallya <varunrmallya@gmail.com>
> ---
Looks ok, but please split kernel fix and tests into separate patches,
and no need to reply to this thread.
pw-bot: cr
> kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c | 4 ++
> .../bpf/prog_tests/kprobe_multi_test.c | 41 +++++++++++++++++++
> .../bpf/progs/kprobe_multi_sleepable.c | 13 ++++++
> 3 files changed, 58 insertions(+)
> create mode 100644 tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/kprobe_multi_sleepable.c
>
> diff --git a/kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c b/kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c
> index 0b040a417442..af7079aa0f36 100644
> --- a/kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c
> +++ b/kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c
> @@ -2752,6 +2752,10 @@ int bpf_kprobe_multi_link_attach(const union bpf_attr *attr, struct bpf_prog *pr
> if (!is_kprobe_multi(prog))
> return -EINVAL;
>
> + /* kprobe_multi is not allowed to be sleepable. */
> + if (prog->sleepable)
> + return -EINVAL;
> +
> /* Writing to context is not allowed for kprobes. */
> if (prog->aux->kprobe_write_ctx)
> return -EINVAL;
> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/kprobe_multi_test.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/kprobe_multi_test.c
> index 78c974d4ea33..f02fec2b6fda 100644
> --- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/kprobe_multi_test.c
> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/kprobe_multi_test.c
> @@ -10,6 +10,7 @@
> #include "kprobe_multi_session_cookie.skel.h"
> #include "kprobe_multi_verifier.skel.h"
> #include "kprobe_write_ctx.skel.h"
> +#include "kprobe_multi_sleepable.skel.h"
> #include "bpf/libbpf_internal.h"
> #include "bpf/hashmap.h"
>
> @@ -633,6 +634,44 @@ static void test_attach_write_ctx(void)
> }
> #endif
>
> +static void test_attach_multi_sleepable(void)
> +{
> + struct kprobe_multi_sleepable *skel;
> + int err;
> +
> + skel = kprobe_multi_sleepable__open();
> + if (!ASSERT_OK_PTR(skel, "kprobe_multi_sleepable__open"))
> + return;
> +
> + err = bpf_program__set_flags(skel->progs.handle_kprobe_multi_sleepable,
> + BPF_F_SLEEPABLE);
> + if (!ASSERT_OK(err, "bpf_program__set_flags"))
> + goto cleanup;
> +
> + /* Load should succeed even with BPF_F_SLEEPABLE for KPROBE types */
> + err = kprobe_multi_sleepable__load(skel);
> + if (!ASSERT_OK(err, "kprobe_multi_sleepable__load"))
> + goto cleanup;
> +
> + /* Attachment must fail for kprobe.multi + BPF_F_SLEEPABLE.
> + * Also chosen a stable symbol to send into opts
> + */
> + LIBBPF_OPTS(bpf_kprobe_multi_opts, opts);
> + const char *sym = "vfs_read";
> +
> + opts.syms = &sym;
> + opts.cnt = 1;
> +
> + skel->links.handle_kprobe_multi_sleepable =
> + bpf_program__attach_kprobe_multi_opts(skel->progs.handle_kprobe_multi_sleepable,
> + NULL, &opts);
> + ASSERT_ERR_PTR(skel->links.handle_kprobe_multi_sleepable,
> + "bpf_program__attach_kprobe_multi_opts");
> +
> +cleanup:
> + kprobe_multi_sleepable__destroy(skel);
> +}
> +
> void serial_test_kprobe_multi_bench_attach(void)
> {
> if (test__start_subtest("kernel"))
> @@ -676,5 +715,7 @@ void test_kprobe_multi_test(void)
> test_unique_match();
> if (test__start_subtest("attach_write_ctx"))
> test_attach_write_ctx();
> + if (test__start_subtest("attach_multi_sleepable"))
> + test_attach_multi_sleepable();
> RUN_TESTS(kprobe_multi_verifier);
> }
> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/kprobe_multi_sleepable.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/kprobe_multi_sleepable.c
> new file mode 100644
> index 000000000000..56973ad8779d
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/kprobe_multi_sleepable.c
> @@ -0,0 +1,13 @@
> +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
> +
> +#include "vmlinux.h"
> +#include <bpf/bpf_helpers.h>
> +#include <bpf/bpf_tracing.h>
> +
> +SEC("kprobe.multi")
> +int handle_kprobe_multi_sleepable(struct pt_regs *ctx)
> +{
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> +char _license[] SEC("license") = "GPL";
> --
> 2.53.0
>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2026-04-01 16:31 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2026-04-01 13:44 [BUG] bpf: kprobe_multi allows BPF_F_SLEEPABLE programs, causing sleeping-in-atomic splat Varun R Mallya
2026-04-01 13:49 ` [PATCH bpf] bpf: Reject sleepable kprobe_multi programs at attach time Varun R Mallya
2026-04-01 14:08 ` Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi
2026-04-01 14:42 ` Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi
2026-04-01 16:25 ` [PATCH bpf v2] " Varun R Mallya
2026-04-01 16:31 ` Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox