public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Pranjal Shrivastava <praan@google.com>
To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Cc: Shivaji Kant <shivajikant@google.com>,
	kbusch@kernel.org, axboe@kernel.dk, sagi@grimberg.me,
	linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org, linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH] nvme: enable PCI P2PDMA support for RDMA transport
Date: Wed, 1 Apr 2026 17:43:22 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <ac1ZOgnpSjxo51WK@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260401141706.GA22165@lst.de>

On Wed, Apr 01, 2026 at 04:17:06PM +0200, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 01, 2026 at 10:34:41AM +0000, Shivaji Kant wrote:
> > Enable BLK_FEAT_PCI_P2PDMA on the NVMe when the underlying
> > RDMA controller supports it.
> > 
> > blk_stack_limits() currently filters out this feature bit because it is
> > absent from BLK_FEAT_INHERIT_MASK. Manually re-assert the capability
> > in nvme_update_ns_info() after the stacking operation.
> 
> This is really two different features/fixes and should be two patches.
> Note that Chaitanya also has an outstanding patch about p2p on multipath,
> so please work with him.
> 

Ack. 
Shivaji, I believe this [1] is the patch Christoph's referring to.

> > Hardware reachability remains enforced by late-stage distance checks
> > during DMA mapping.
> 
> I don't know what this is supposed to mean.  Callers need to check the
> reachability first before submitting P2P I/O.
> 
> > +static bool nvme_rdma_supports_pci_p2pdma(struct nvme_ctrl *ctrl)
> > +{
> > +	struct nvme_rdma_ctrl *r_ctrl = to_rdma_ctrl(ctrl);
> > +	bool supported = false;
> > +
> > +	if (r_ctrl && r_ctrl->device)
> 
> to_rdma_ctrl is a wrapper around container_of, so r_ctrl can't be
> NULL for a non-NULL ctrl.  ->device also should not NULL because it
> is set up before namespaces are probed.
> 
> > +		supported = ib_dma_pci_p2p_dma_supported(r_ctrl->device->dev);
> > +
> > +	dev_dbg(ctrl->device, "PCI P2PDMA support result: %s\n",
> > +			supported ? "PASSED" : "FAILED (HW/Driver restriction)");
> 
> Overly long line, and screaming isn't really something we do in our
> messages.  We also don't do that debug message in PCI, so please just
> drop it.  IF you think this is important enough add a tracepoint in the
> core code in a separate patch.
> 

+1, we should drop the log and add a TP if necessary.

Thanks,
Praan

[1] https://lore.kernel.org/all/20260323234416.46944-3-kch@nvidia.com/

  reply	other threads:[~2026-04-01 17:43 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-04-01 10:34 [RFC PATCH] nvme: enable PCI P2PDMA support for RDMA transport Shivaji Kant
2026-04-01 14:17 ` Christoph Hellwig
2026-04-01 17:43   ` Pranjal Shrivastava [this message]
2026-04-01 17:55     ` Shivaji Kant

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=ac1ZOgnpSjxo51WK@google.com \
    --to=praan@google.com \
    --cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
    --cc=hch@lst.de \
    --cc=kbusch@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=sagi@grimberg.me \
    --cc=shivajikant@google.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox