From: Pranjal Shrivastava <praan@google.com>
To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Cc: Shivaji Kant <shivajikant@google.com>,
kbusch@kernel.org, axboe@kernel.dk, sagi@grimberg.me,
linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org, linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH] nvme: enable PCI P2PDMA support for RDMA transport
Date: Wed, 1 Apr 2026 17:43:22 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ac1ZOgnpSjxo51WK@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260401141706.GA22165@lst.de>
On Wed, Apr 01, 2026 at 04:17:06PM +0200, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 01, 2026 at 10:34:41AM +0000, Shivaji Kant wrote:
> > Enable BLK_FEAT_PCI_P2PDMA on the NVMe when the underlying
> > RDMA controller supports it.
> >
> > blk_stack_limits() currently filters out this feature bit because it is
> > absent from BLK_FEAT_INHERIT_MASK. Manually re-assert the capability
> > in nvme_update_ns_info() after the stacking operation.
>
> This is really two different features/fixes and should be two patches.
> Note that Chaitanya also has an outstanding patch about p2p on multipath,
> so please work with him.
>
Ack.
Shivaji, I believe this [1] is the patch Christoph's referring to.
> > Hardware reachability remains enforced by late-stage distance checks
> > during DMA mapping.
>
> I don't know what this is supposed to mean. Callers need to check the
> reachability first before submitting P2P I/O.
>
> > +static bool nvme_rdma_supports_pci_p2pdma(struct nvme_ctrl *ctrl)
> > +{
> > + struct nvme_rdma_ctrl *r_ctrl = to_rdma_ctrl(ctrl);
> > + bool supported = false;
> > +
> > + if (r_ctrl && r_ctrl->device)
>
> to_rdma_ctrl is a wrapper around container_of, so r_ctrl can't be
> NULL for a non-NULL ctrl. ->device also should not NULL because it
> is set up before namespaces are probed.
>
> > + supported = ib_dma_pci_p2p_dma_supported(r_ctrl->device->dev);
> > +
> > + dev_dbg(ctrl->device, "PCI P2PDMA support result: %s\n",
> > + supported ? "PASSED" : "FAILED (HW/Driver restriction)");
>
> Overly long line, and screaming isn't really something we do in our
> messages. We also don't do that debug message in PCI, so please just
> drop it. IF you think this is important enough add a tracepoint in the
> core code in a separate patch.
>
+1, we should drop the log and add a TP if necessary.
Thanks,
Praan
[1] https://lore.kernel.org/all/20260323234416.46944-3-kch@nvidia.com/
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-04-01 17:43 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-04-01 10:34 [RFC PATCH] nvme: enable PCI P2PDMA support for RDMA transport Shivaji Kant
2026-04-01 14:17 ` Christoph Hellwig
2026-04-01 17:43 ` Pranjal Shrivastava [this message]
2026-04-01 17:55 ` Shivaji Kant
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=ac1ZOgnpSjxo51WK@google.com \
--to=praan@google.com \
--cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
--cc=hch@lst.de \
--cc=kbusch@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sagi@grimberg.me \
--cc=shivajikant@google.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox