Re: [PATCH v3] perf pmu intel: Adjust cpumaks for sub-NUMA clusters on Emeraldrapids

[Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>]

On Wed, Apr 01, 2026 at 09:38:24AM -0700, Ian Rogers wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 12, 2026 at 4:08 PM Chen, Zide <zide.chen@intel.com> wrote:
> >
> > On 2/12/2026 2:39 PM, Chun-Tse Shao wrote:
> > > Similar to GNR [1], Emeraldrapids supports sub-NUMA clusters as well.
> > > Adjust cpumasks as the logic for GNR in [1].
> > >
> > > Tested on Emeraldrapids with SNC2 enabled:
> > >   $ perf stat --per-node -e 'UNC_CHA_CLOCKTICKS,UNC_M_CLOCKTICKS' -a -- sleep 1
> > >
> > >    Performance counter stats for 'system wide':
> > >
> > >   N0       30        72125876670      UNC_CHA_CLOCKTICKS
> > >   N0        4         8815163648      UNC_M_CLOCKTICKS
> > >   N1       30        72124958844      UNC_CHA_CLOCKTICKS
> > >   N1        4         8815014974      UNC_M_CLOCKTICKS
> > >   N2       30        72121049022      UNC_CHA_CLOCKTICKS
> > >   N2        4         8814592626      UNC_M_CLOCKTICKS
> > >   N3       30        72117133854      UNC_CHA_CLOCKTICKS
> > >   N3        4         8814012840      UNC_M_CLOCKTICKS
> > >
> > >          1.001574118 seconds time elapsed
> > >
> > > [1] lore.kernel.org/20250515181417.491401-1-irogers@google.com
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Chun-Tse Shao <ctshao@google.com>
> >
> > LGTM.
> >
> > Reviewed-by: Zide Chen <zide.chen@intel.com>
> 
> Reviewed-by: Ian Rogers <irogers@google.com>

It doesn't apply cleanly anymore.  CT, can you please rebase?

Thanks,
Namhyung