* [PATCH] sched_ext: Fix stale direct dispatch state in ddsp_dsq_id
@ 2026-04-01 21:56 Andrea Righi
2026-04-01 22:46 ` Tejun Heo
0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Andrea Righi @ 2026-04-01 21:56 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Tejun Heo, David Vernet, Changwoo Min
Cc: Daniel Hodges, sched-ext, linux-kernel
@p->scx.ddsp_dsq_id can be left set (non-SCX_DSQ_INVALID) in three
scenarios, causing a spurious WARN_ON_ONCE() in mark_direct_dispatch()
when the next wakeup's ops.select_cpu() calls scx_bpf_dsq_insert():
1. Deferred dispatch cancellation: when a task is directly dispatched to
a remote CPU's local DSQ via ops.select_cpu() or ops.enqueue(), the
dispatch is deferred (since we can't lock the remote rq while holding
the current one). If the task is dequeued before processing the
dispatch in process_ddsp_deferred_locals(), dispatch_dequeue()
removes the task from the list leaving a stale direct dispatch state.
Fix: clear ddsp_dsq_id and ddsp_enq_flags in the !list_empty branch
of dispatch_dequeue().
2. Holding-cpu dispatch race: when dispatch_to_local_dsq() transfers a
task to another CPU's local DSQ, it sets holding_cpu and releases
DISPATCHING before locking the source rq. If dequeue wins the race
and clears holding_cpu, dispatch_enqueue() is never called and
ddsp_dsq_id is not cleared.
Fix: clear ddsp_dsq_id and ddsp_enq_flags when clearing holding_cpu
in dispatch_dequeue().
3. Cross-scheduler-instance stale state: When an SCX scheduler exits,
scx_bypass() iterates over all runnable tasks to dequeue/re-enqueue
them, but sleeping tasks are not on any runqueue and are not touched.
If a sleeping task had a deferred dispatch in flight (ddsp_dsq_id
set) at the time the scheduler exited, the state persists. When a new
scheduler instance loads and calls scx_enable_task() for all tasks,
it does not reset this leftover state. The next wakeup's
ops.select_cpu() then sees a non-INVALID ddsp_dsq_id and triggers:
WARN_ON_ONCE(p->scx.ddsp_dsq_id != SCX_DSQ_INVALID)
Fix: clear ddsp_dsq_id and ddsp_enq_flags in scx_enable_task() before
calling ops.enable(), ensuring each new scheduler instance starts
with a clean direct dispatch state per task.
With all the fixes applied the SCX_DSQ_INVALID warning doesn't seem to
happen anymore.
Fixes: 5b26f7b920f76 ("sched_ext: Allow SCX_DSQ_LOCAL_ON for direct dispatches")
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org # v6.12+
Cc: Daniel Hodges <hodgesd@meta.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrea Righi <arighi@nvidia.com>
---
kernel/sched/ext.c | 23 +++++++++++++++++++----
1 file changed, 19 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/kernel/sched/ext.c b/kernel/sched/ext.c
index 26a6ac2f88267..de827ce0ffb74 100644
--- a/kernel/sched/ext.c
+++ b/kernel/sched/ext.c
@@ -1163,20 +1163,32 @@ static void dispatch_dequeue(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *p)
if (!dsq) {
/*
* If !dsq && on-list, @p is on @rq's ddsp_deferred_locals.
- * Unlinking is all that's needed to cancel.
+ * Unlink and clear the deferred dispatch state.
*/
- if (unlikely(!list_empty(&p->scx.dsq_list.node)))
+ if (unlikely(!list_empty(&p->scx.dsq_list.node))) {
list_del_init(&p->scx.dsq_list.node);
+ p->scx.ddsp_dsq_id = SCX_DSQ_INVALID;
+ p->scx.ddsp_enq_flags = 0;
+ }
+
/*
* When dispatching directly from the BPF scheduler to a local
* DSQ, the task isn't associated with any DSQ but
* @p->scx.holding_cpu may be set under the protection of
- * %SCX_OPSS_DISPATCHING.
+ * %SCX_OPSS_DISPATCHING. If we win the race and clear
+ * holding_cpu before dispatch_to_local_dsq() completes, the
+ * in-flight dispatch is cancelled and dispatch_enqueue() won't
+ * be called. Clear the stale direct dispatch state here so the
+ * next wakeup starts clean.
*/
- if (p->scx.holding_cpu >= 0)
+ if (p->scx.holding_cpu >= 0) {
p->scx.holding_cpu = -1;
+ p->scx.ddsp_dsq_id = SCX_DSQ_INVALID;
+ p->scx.ddsp_enq_flags = 0;
+ }
+
return;
}
@@ -2945,6 +2957,9 @@ static void scx_enable_task(struct task_struct *p)
p->scx.weight = sched_weight_to_cgroup(weight);
+ p->scx.ddsp_dsq_id = SCX_DSQ_INVALID;
+ p->scx.ddsp_enq_flags = 0;
+
if (SCX_HAS_OP(sch, enable))
SCX_CALL_OP_TASK(sch, SCX_KF_REST, enable, rq, p);
scx_set_task_state(p, SCX_TASK_ENABLED);
--
2.53.0
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] sched_ext: Fix stale direct dispatch state in ddsp_dsq_id
2026-04-01 21:56 [PATCH] sched_ext: Fix stale direct dispatch state in ddsp_dsq_id Andrea Righi
@ 2026-04-01 22:46 ` Tejun Heo
2026-04-02 7:40 ` Andrea Righi
0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Tejun Heo @ 2026-04-01 22:46 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Andrea Righi
Cc: David Vernet, Changwoo Min, Daniel Hodges, sched-ext,
linux-kernel, patsomaru
Hello,
(cc'ing Patrick Somaru. This is the same issue reported on
https://github.com/sched-ext/scx/pull/3482)
On Wed, Apr 01, 2026 at 11:56:19PM +0200, Andrea Righi wrote:
> @p->scx.ddsp_dsq_id can be left set (non-SCX_DSQ_INVALID) in three
> scenarios, causing a spurious WARN_ON_ONCE() in mark_direct_dispatch()
> when the next wakeup's ops.select_cpu() calls scx_bpf_dsq_insert():
>
> 1. Deferred dispatch cancellation: when a task is directly dispatched to
> a remote CPU's local DSQ via ops.select_cpu() or ops.enqueue(), the
> dispatch is deferred (since we can't lock the remote rq while holding
> the current one). If the task is dequeued before processing the
> dispatch in process_ddsp_deferred_locals(), dispatch_dequeue()
> removes the task from the list leaving a stale direct dispatch state.
>
> Fix: clear ddsp_dsq_id and ddsp_enq_flags in the !list_empty branch
> of dispatch_dequeue().
>
> 2. Holding-cpu dispatch race: when dispatch_to_local_dsq() transfers a
> task to another CPU's local DSQ, it sets holding_cpu and releases
> DISPATCHING before locking the source rq. If dequeue wins the race
> and clears holding_cpu, dispatch_enqueue() is never called and
> ddsp_dsq_id is not cleared.
>
> Fix: clear ddsp_dsq_id and ddsp_enq_flags when clearing holding_cpu
> in dispatch_dequeue().
These two just mean that dequeue need to clear it, right?
> 3. Cross-scheduler-instance stale state: When an SCX scheduler exits,
> scx_bypass() iterates over all runnable tasks to dequeue/re-enqueue
> them, but sleeping tasks are not on any runqueue and are not touched.
> If a sleeping task had a deferred dispatch in flight (ddsp_dsq_id
> set) at the time the scheduler exited, the state persists. When a new
> scheduler instance loads and calls scx_enable_task() for all tasks,
> it does not reset this leftover state. The next wakeup's
> ops.select_cpu() then sees a non-INVALID ddsp_dsq_id and triggers:
>
> WARN_ON_ONCE(p->scx.ddsp_dsq_id != SCX_DSQ_INVALID)
>
> Fix: clear ddsp_dsq_id and ddsp_enq_flags in scx_enable_task() before
> calling ops.enable(), ensuring each new scheduler instance starts
> with a clean direct dispatch state per task.
I don't understand this one. If we fix the missing clearing from dequeue,
where would the residual ddsp_dsq_id come from? How would a sleeping task
have ddsp_dsq_id set? Note that select_cpu() + enqueue() call sequence is
atomic w.r.t. dequeue as both are protected by pi_lock.
It's been always a bit bothersome that ddsp_dsq_id was being cleared in
dispatch_enqueue(). It was there to catch the cases where ddsp_dsq_id was
overridden but it just isn't the right place. Can we do the following?
- Add clear_direct_dispatch() which clears ddsp_dsq_id and ddsp_enq_flags.
- Add clear_direct_dispatch() call under the enqueue: in do_enqueue_task()
and remove ddsp clearing from dispatch_enqueue(). This should catch all
cases that ignore ddsp.
- Add clear_direct_dispatch() call after dispatch_enqueue() in
direct_dispatch(). This clears it for the synchronous consumption.
- Add clear_direct_dispatch() call before dispatch_to_local_dsq() call in
process_ddsp_deferred_locals(). Note that the funciton has to cache and
clear ddsp fields *before* calling dispatch_to_local_enq() as the function
will migrate the task to another rq and we can't control what happens to
it afterwrds. Even for the previous synchronous case, it may just be a
better pattern to always cache dsq_id and enq_flags in local vars and
clear p->scx.ddsp* before calling dispatch_enqueue().
- Add clear_direct_dispatch() call to dequeue_task_scx() after
dispatch_dequeue().
I think this should capture all cases and the fields are cleared where they
should be cleared (either consumed or canceled).
Thanks.
--
tejun
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] sched_ext: Fix stale direct dispatch state in ddsp_dsq_id
2026-04-01 22:46 ` Tejun Heo
@ 2026-04-02 7:40 ` Andrea Righi
2026-04-02 7:54 ` Andrea Righi
0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Andrea Righi @ 2026-04-02 7:40 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Tejun Heo
Cc: David Vernet, Changwoo Min, Daniel Hodges, sched-ext,
linux-kernel, patsomaru
Hi Tejun,
On Wed, Apr 01, 2026 at 12:46:58PM -1000, Tejun Heo wrote:
> Hello,
>
> (cc'ing Patrick Somaru. This is the same issue reported on
> https://github.com/sched-ext/scx/pull/3482)
>
> On Wed, Apr 01, 2026 at 11:56:19PM +0200, Andrea Righi wrote:
> > @p->scx.ddsp_dsq_id can be left set (non-SCX_DSQ_INVALID) in three
> > scenarios, causing a spurious WARN_ON_ONCE() in mark_direct_dispatch()
> > when the next wakeup's ops.select_cpu() calls scx_bpf_dsq_insert():
> >
> > 1. Deferred dispatch cancellation: when a task is directly dispatched to
> > a remote CPU's local DSQ via ops.select_cpu() or ops.enqueue(), the
> > dispatch is deferred (since we can't lock the remote rq while holding
> > the current one). If the task is dequeued before processing the
> > dispatch in process_ddsp_deferred_locals(), dispatch_dequeue()
> > removes the task from the list leaving a stale direct dispatch state.
> >
> > Fix: clear ddsp_dsq_id and ddsp_enq_flags in the !list_empty branch
> > of dispatch_dequeue().
> >
> > 2. Holding-cpu dispatch race: when dispatch_to_local_dsq() transfers a
> > task to another CPU's local DSQ, it sets holding_cpu and releases
> > DISPATCHING before locking the source rq. If dequeue wins the race
> > and clears holding_cpu, dispatch_enqueue() is never called and
> > ddsp_dsq_id is not cleared.
> >
> > Fix: clear ddsp_dsq_id and ddsp_enq_flags when clearing holding_cpu
> > in dispatch_dequeue().
>
> These two just mean that dequeue need to clear it, right?
Correct, we want to clear the state where dispatch_dequeue() cancels a
pending direct dispatch without calling dispatch_enqueue(), so I could have
just clear the state unconditionally in the !dsq case and simplify the
code.
>
> > 3. Cross-scheduler-instance stale state: When an SCX scheduler exits,
> > scx_bypass() iterates over all runnable tasks to dequeue/re-enqueue
> > them, but sleeping tasks are not on any runqueue and are not touched.
> > If a sleeping task had a deferred dispatch in flight (ddsp_dsq_id
> > set) at the time the scheduler exited, the state persists. When a new
> > scheduler instance loads and calls scx_enable_task() for all tasks,
> > it does not reset this leftover state. The next wakeup's
> > ops.select_cpu() then sees a non-INVALID ddsp_dsq_id and triggers:
> >
> > WARN_ON_ONCE(p->scx.ddsp_dsq_id != SCX_DSQ_INVALID)
> >
> > Fix: clear ddsp_dsq_id and ddsp_enq_flags in scx_enable_task() before
> > calling ops.enable(), ensuring each new scheduler instance starts
> > with a clean direct dispatch state per task.
>
> I don't understand this one. If we fix the missing clearing from dequeue,
> where would the residual ddsp_dsq_id come from? How would a sleeping task
> have ddsp_dsq_id set? Note that select_cpu() + enqueue() call sequence is
> atomic w.r.t. dequeue as both are protected by pi_lock.
>
> It's been always a bit bothersome that ddsp_dsq_id was being cleared in
> dispatch_enqueue(). It was there to catch the cases where ddsp_dsq_id was
> overridden but it just isn't the right place. Can we do the following?
>
> - Add clear_direct_dispatch() which clears ddsp_dsq_id and ddsp_enq_flags.
>
> - Add clear_direct_dispatch() call under the enqueue: in do_enqueue_task()
> and remove ddsp clearing from dispatch_enqueue(). This should catch all
> cases that ignore ddsp.
>
> - Add clear_direct_dispatch() call after dispatch_enqueue() in
> direct_dispatch(). This clears it for the synchronous consumption.
>
> - Add clear_direct_dispatch() call before dispatch_to_local_dsq() call in
> process_ddsp_deferred_locals(). Note that the funciton has to cache and
> clear ddsp fields *before* calling dispatch_to_local_enq() as the function
> will migrate the task to another rq and we can't control what happens to
> it afterwrds. Even for the previous synchronous case, it may just be a
> better pattern to always cache dsq_id and enq_flags in local vars and
> clear p->scx.ddsp* before calling dispatch_enqueue().
>
> - Add clear_direct_dispatch() call to dequeue_task_scx() after
> dispatch_dequeue().
>
> I think this should capture all cases and the fields are cleared where they
> should be cleared (either consumed or canceled).
I like this, it looks like a better design.
However, I tried it, but I'm still able to trigger the warning, unless I
clear the direct dispatch state in __scx_enable_task(), so we're still
missing a case that doesn't properly clear the state.
I think it has something to do with sleeping tasks / queued wakeups /
bypass, because now I can easily reproduce the warning running a
`stress-ng --sleep 1` while restarting a scheduler that uses
SCX_OPS_ALLOW_QUEUED_WAKEUP, like scx_cosmos. Will keep investigating...
Thanks,
-Andrea
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] sched_ext: Fix stale direct dispatch state in ddsp_dsq_id
2026-04-02 7:40 ` Andrea Righi
@ 2026-04-02 7:54 ` Andrea Righi
0 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Andrea Righi @ 2026-04-02 7:54 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Tejun Heo
Cc: David Vernet, Changwoo Min, Daniel Hodges, sched-ext,
linux-kernel, patsomaru
On Thu, Apr 02, 2026 at 09:40:41AM +0200, Andrea Righi wrote:
> Hi Tejun,
>
> On Wed, Apr 01, 2026 at 12:46:58PM -1000, Tejun Heo wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > (cc'ing Patrick Somaru. This is the same issue reported on
> > https://github.com/sched-ext/scx/pull/3482)
> >
> > On Wed, Apr 01, 2026 at 11:56:19PM +0200, Andrea Righi wrote:
> > > @p->scx.ddsp_dsq_id can be left set (non-SCX_DSQ_INVALID) in three
> > > scenarios, causing a spurious WARN_ON_ONCE() in mark_direct_dispatch()
> > > when the next wakeup's ops.select_cpu() calls scx_bpf_dsq_insert():
> > >
> > > 1. Deferred dispatch cancellation: when a task is directly dispatched to
> > > a remote CPU's local DSQ via ops.select_cpu() or ops.enqueue(), the
> > > dispatch is deferred (since we can't lock the remote rq while holding
> > > the current one). If the task is dequeued before processing the
> > > dispatch in process_ddsp_deferred_locals(), dispatch_dequeue()
> > > removes the task from the list leaving a stale direct dispatch state.
> > >
> > > Fix: clear ddsp_dsq_id and ddsp_enq_flags in the !list_empty branch
> > > of dispatch_dequeue().
> > >
> > > 2. Holding-cpu dispatch race: when dispatch_to_local_dsq() transfers a
> > > task to another CPU's local DSQ, it sets holding_cpu and releases
> > > DISPATCHING before locking the source rq. If dequeue wins the race
> > > and clears holding_cpu, dispatch_enqueue() is never called and
> > > ddsp_dsq_id is not cleared.
> > >
> > > Fix: clear ddsp_dsq_id and ddsp_enq_flags when clearing holding_cpu
> > > in dispatch_dequeue().
> >
> > These two just mean that dequeue need to clear it, right?
>
> Correct, we want to clear the state where dispatch_dequeue() cancels a
> pending direct dispatch without calling dispatch_enqueue(), so I could have
> just clear the state unconditionally in the !dsq case and simplify the
> code.
>
> >
> > > 3. Cross-scheduler-instance stale state: When an SCX scheduler exits,
> > > scx_bypass() iterates over all runnable tasks to dequeue/re-enqueue
> > > them, but sleeping tasks are not on any runqueue and are not touched.
> > > If a sleeping task had a deferred dispatch in flight (ddsp_dsq_id
> > > set) at the time the scheduler exited, the state persists. When a new
> > > scheduler instance loads and calls scx_enable_task() for all tasks,
> > > it does not reset this leftover state. The next wakeup's
> > > ops.select_cpu() then sees a non-INVALID ddsp_dsq_id and triggers:
> > >
> > > WARN_ON_ONCE(p->scx.ddsp_dsq_id != SCX_DSQ_INVALID)
> > >
> > > Fix: clear ddsp_dsq_id and ddsp_enq_flags in scx_enable_task() before
> > > calling ops.enable(), ensuring each new scheduler instance starts
> > > with a clean direct dispatch state per task.
> >
> > I don't understand this one. If we fix the missing clearing from dequeue,
> > where would the residual ddsp_dsq_id come from? How would a sleeping task
> > have ddsp_dsq_id set? Note that select_cpu() + enqueue() call sequence is
> > atomic w.r.t. dequeue as both are protected by pi_lock.
> >
> > It's been always a bit bothersome that ddsp_dsq_id was being cleared in
> > dispatch_enqueue(). It was there to catch the cases where ddsp_dsq_id was
> > overridden but it just isn't the right place. Can we do the following?
> >
> > - Add clear_direct_dispatch() which clears ddsp_dsq_id and ddsp_enq_flags.
> >
> > - Add clear_direct_dispatch() call under the enqueue: in do_enqueue_task()
> > and remove ddsp clearing from dispatch_enqueue(). This should catch all
> > cases that ignore ddsp.
> >
> > - Add clear_direct_dispatch() call after dispatch_enqueue() in
> > direct_dispatch(). This clears it for the synchronous consumption.
> >
> > - Add clear_direct_dispatch() call before dispatch_to_local_dsq() call in
> > process_ddsp_deferred_locals(). Note that the funciton has to cache and
> > clear ddsp fields *before* calling dispatch_to_local_enq() as the function
> > will migrate the task to another rq and we can't control what happens to
> > it afterwrds. Even for the previous synchronous case, it may just be a
> > better pattern to always cache dsq_id and enq_flags in local vars and
> > clear p->scx.ddsp* before calling dispatch_enqueue().
> >
> > - Add clear_direct_dispatch() call to dequeue_task_scx() after
> > dispatch_dequeue().
> >
> > I think this should capture all cases and the fields are cleared where they
> > should be cleared (either consumed or canceled).
>
> I like this, it looks like a better design.
>
> However, I tried it, but I'm still able to trigger the warning, unless I
> clear the direct dispatch state in __scx_enable_task(), so we're still
> missing a case that doesn't properly clear the state.
>
> I think it has something to do with sleeping tasks / queued wakeups /
> bypass, because now I can easily reproduce the warning running a
> `stress-ng --sleep 1` while restarting a scheduler that uses
> SCX_OPS_ALLOW_QUEUED_WAKEUP, like scx_cosmos. Will keep investigating...
I think I see it: waking tasks may have had ddsp_dsq_id set by the outgoing
scheduler's ops.select_cpu() and then been queued on a wake_list via
ttwu_queue_wakelist(), when SCX_OPS_ALLOW_QUEUED_WAKEUP is set. Such tasks are
not on the runqueue (on_rq == 0) and are not iterated by scx_bypass(), so their
direct dispatch state won't be cleared by dequeue_task_scx().
How about clearning the direct dispatch state in scx_disable_task()? That would
catch those tasks as well and it won't leave the stale state from the previous
scx scheduler instance.
Thanks,
-Andrea
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2026-04-02 7:54 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2026-04-01 21:56 [PATCH] sched_ext: Fix stale direct dispatch state in ddsp_dsq_id Andrea Righi
2026-04-01 22:46 ` Tejun Heo
2026-04-02 7:40 ` Andrea Righi
2026-04-02 7:54 ` Andrea Righi
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox