From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [10.30.226.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 37099348452; Mon, 23 Mar 2026 20:26:07 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1774297568; cv=none; b=FAzaZTrzrM4LPNjbJQQclUw7y2Tb+UXO5y2kNfIMrm5sJX3ZF+yxQr94YZvSXo5CblYAzyrKHhfAaZ6twAgPLtoV7aNzchZg6204dgGP4IUh9czFEqqQxqthaiSb0H1AJkRtkYBt7oim6U0v1oXyL0zsXHID6JP+vDHAfvaTTIU= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1774297568; c=relaxed/simple; bh=5Sp63JReJLZTZJuTwtijwpBpoSJpQfr3461ngWL4Ye4=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=fzFakXjvkwhuwTDCig5Mg1luS0RvijB204hJ3td9R4bEImRxnWSxZcgz/RxrEnv0+IAJvzjyHwNYQU7eloCs8rgz0YH1srYcFnUw+iXXyc9yIJg5lJutP4UF8paSspiKM/BZSN/oVHw4LkK0Njak74SE3Q8YvjX6p9B1Ul6MI0Y= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id ADBA0C4CEF7; Mon, 23 Mar 2026 20:26:07 +0000 (UTC) Date: Mon, 23 Mar 2026 15:26:06 -0500 From: Clark Williams To: "Moritz KLAMMLER (FERCHAU)" Cc: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior , Thomas Gleixner , Peter Zijlstra , "linux-rt-devel@lists.linux.dev" , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" Subject: Re: AW: Possible PREEMPT_RT live-lock / priority-inversion between FUTEX_CMP_REQUEUE_PI and FUTEX_WAIT_REQUEUE_PI Message-ID: References: <20260323133034.vk87xPj9@linutronix.de> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: On Mon, Mar 23, 2026 at 04:12:24PM +0000, Moritz KLAMMLER (FERCHAU) wrote: > > >> we're running Linux 6.6 with PREEMPT_RT on a single-core armv7l machine > > v6.6.109+? > > Yes, 6.6.122 to be precise. > Moritz, Just to satisfy my curiosity, are you running my stable v6.6-rt kernels or rolling your own? (Not that it would affect this bug at all, since my tree has the same issue). Thanks, Clark -- The United States Coast Guard Ruining Natural Selection since 1790