public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko@kernel.org>
To: Arun Menon <armenon@redhat.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-integrity@vger.kernel.org,
	Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@ziepe.ca>, Peter Huewe <peterhuewe@gmx.de>
Subject: Re: [RFC 2/4] tpm_crb: Add new wrapper function to invoke start method
Date: Tue, 24 Mar 2026 12:42:19 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <acJqi8S81I2hwvsR@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260324071803.324774-3-armenon@redhat.com>

On Tue, Mar 24, 2026 at 12:48:01PM +0530, Arun Menon wrote:
> - Extract start invocation code into a separate function called
>   crb_trigger_tpm. This will be helpful in repeatedly calling the
>   start method with different bits set to toggle between start,
>   nextChunk or crbRspRetry behaviours.
> - Based on the bit set, we signal the TPM to consume
>   contents of the command/response buffer.
> - No functional change intended.

Please write a proper commit message, which is not a task list.

> 
> Signed-off-by: Arun Menon <armenon@redhat.com>
> ---
>  drivers/char/tpm/tpm_crb.c | 50 ++++++++++++++++++++------------------
>  1 file changed, 27 insertions(+), 23 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/char/tpm/tpm_crb.c b/drivers/char/tpm/tpm_crb.c
> index 67c0061d4cab7..10128d078245c 100644
> --- a/drivers/char/tpm/tpm_crb.c
> +++ b/drivers/char/tpm/tpm_crb.c
> @@ -445,6 +445,32 @@ static int tpm_crb_smc_start(struct device *dev, unsigned long func_id)
>  }
>  #endif
>  
> +static int crb_trigger_tpm(struct tpm_chip *chip, u32 start_cmd)
> +{
> +	struct crb_priv *priv = dev_get_drvdata(&chip->dev);
> +	int rc;
> +	/* The reason for the extra quirk is that the PTT in 4th Gen Core CPUs
> +	 * report only ACPI start but in practice seems to require both
> +	 * CRB start, hence invoking CRB start method if hid == MSFT0101.
> +	 */
> +	if (priv->sm == ACPI_TPM2_COMMAND_BUFFER ||
> +	    priv->sm == ACPI_TPM2_MEMORY_MAPPED ||
> +	    !strcmp(priv->hid, "MSFT0101"))
> +		iowrite32(start_cmd, &priv->regs_t->ctrl_start);
> +	if (priv->sm == ACPI_TPM2_START_METHOD ||
> +	    priv->sm == ACPI_TPM2_COMMAND_BUFFER_WITH_START_METHOD)
> +		rc = crb_do_acpi_start(chip);
> +	if (priv->sm == ACPI_TPM2_COMMAND_BUFFER_WITH_ARM_SMC) {
> +		iowrite32(start_cmd, &priv->regs_t->ctrl_start);
> +		rc = tpm_crb_smc_start(&chip->dev, priv->smc_func_id);
> +	}
> +	if (priv->sm == ACPI_TPM2_CRB_WITH_ARM_FFA) {
> +		iowrite32(start_cmd, &priv->regs_t->ctrl_start);
> +		rc = tpm_crb_ffa_start(CRB_FFA_START_TYPE_COMMAND, chip->locality);
> +	}
> +	return rc;
> +}
> +
>  static int crb_send(struct tpm_chip *chip, u8 *buf, size_t bufsiz, size_t len)
>  {
>  	struct crb_priv *priv = dev_get_drvdata(&chip->dev);
> @@ -470,29 +496,7 @@ static int crb_send(struct tpm_chip *chip, u8 *buf, size_t bufsiz, size_t len)
>  	/* Make sure that cmd is populated before issuing start. */
>  	wmb();
>  
> -	/* The reason for the extra quirk is that the PTT in 4th Gen Core CPUs
> -	 * report only ACPI start but in practice seems to require both
> -	 * CRB start, hence invoking CRB start method if hid == MSFT0101.
> -	 */
> -	if (priv->sm == ACPI_TPM2_COMMAND_BUFFER ||
> -	    priv->sm == ACPI_TPM2_MEMORY_MAPPED ||
> -	    !strcmp(priv->hid, "MSFT0101"))
> -		iowrite32(CRB_START_INVOKE, &priv->regs_t->ctrl_start);
> -
> -	if (priv->sm == ACPI_TPM2_START_METHOD ||
> -	    priv->sm == ACPI_TPM2_COMMAND_BUFFER_WITH_START_METHOD)
> -		rc = crb_do_acpi_start(chip);
> -
> -	if (priv->sm == ACPI_TPM2_COMMAND_BUFFER_WITH_ARM_SMC) {
> -		iowrite32(CRB_START_INVOKE, &priv->regs_t->ctrl_start);
> -		rc = tpm_crb_smc_start(&chip->dev, priv->smc_func_id);
> -	}
> -
> -	if (priv->sm == ACPI_TPM2_CRB_WITH_ARM_FFA) {
> -		iowrite32(CRB_START_INVOKE, &priv->regs_t->ctrl_start);
> -		rc = tpm_crb_ffa_start(CRB_FFA_START_TYPE_COMMAND, chip->locality);
> -	}
> -
> +	rc = crb_trigger_tpm(chip, CRB_START_INVOKE);
>  	if (rc)
>  		return rc;
>  
> -- 
> 2.53.0
> 

BR, Jarkko

  reply	other threads:[~2026-03-24 10:42 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-03-24  7:17 [RFC 0/4] tpm_crb: Add command and response buffer chunking support Arun Menon
2026-03-24  7:18 ` [RFC 1/4] tpm_crb: Add definition of TPM CRB chunking fields Arun Menon
2026-03-24  7:18 ` [RFC 2/4] tpm_crb: Add new wrapper function to invoke start method Arun Menon
2026-03-24 10:42   ` Jarkko Sakkinen [this message]
2026-03-24 12:43     ` Arun Menon
2026-03-24  7:18 ` [RFC 3/4] tpm_crb: Implement command and response chunking logic Arun Menon
2026-03-24 10:45   ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2026-03-24 12:46     ` Arun Menon
2026-03-24  7:18 ` [RFC 4/4] tpm: Increase TPM_BUFSIZE to 64kB for chunking support Arun Menon
2026-03-24 10:41 ` [RFC 0/4] tpm_crb: Add command and response buffer " Jarkko Sakkinen
2026-03-24 12:41   ` Arun Menon

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=acJqi8S81I2hwvsR@kernel.org \
    --to=jarkko@kernel.org \
    --cc=armenon@redhat.com \
    --cc=jgg@ziepe.ca \
    --cc=linux-integrity@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=peterhuewe@gmx.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox