From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [10.30.226.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 230D3352C35; Wed, 25 Mar 2026 06:23:42 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1774419823; cv=none; b=DtoYo2oRc1CX0rIBHeqsooQF5o80TCAAXH7OAPGzjFYI9x1ZI5TiXlV1OZueiWGThCPyKuJr2ZZPqtWv1F5xp5sX5EINDG4QSOVN6Ry/xjncrygBdFBzw8SV/dGbjkGYaz3KDOKIEXaxaw3tcqScPRletzsKx1XE7GmX57H0Wsk= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1774419823; c=relaxed/simple; bh=9Ys9kLszkYFD7JrLh+1mZnnRESLdkc+zF9YL65ZJBIE=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=Q0LsyefjHnr2qXGGMS4iTH8PnIxPvGQxZTx+sOj4iFJSRBdOJ6nV/LgzephZYn68TizyQcI44J+q5+MKocQ0z44sqcS9aTDJsSYCx7FIg3z0vCgacglBRQJg/9r9KqiKkYDCRvYpqGrRWSTH2dQEtn/eRxgotAvLqGOhsYBMZqk= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=tB7pVIEO; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="tB7pVIEO" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id F06DEC4CEF7; Wed, 25 Mar 2026 06:23:39 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1774419822; bh=9Ys9kLszkYFD7JrLh+1mZnnRESLdkc+zF9YL65ZJBIE=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=tB7pVIEOFeVSGcy2azcUUZ6dRdiJOUbhCVjoHFeaMNrG5Pihra+GBs6hV0PCIY9Oe TkfRjRhs5aQtMB6lzdWf+4b9637Y8hRP25+yvCSqltp8Gyv/8o/MT2isbPvO5g6Amm E+RYCsiQ2NoKyROst7+mkFKNEJmyXpsuB8WQ5FNhLTmKH5NPJFsT978489EeohrOuL aE1PI7STX+KxmNuAKVYdEU19GHDYB07o5/Rz1EODBPJ2a4qfdrlHidwOGs7YteVEzC 3nhblbmheeOPVvT9urmidpzYfUgZIqxEcHr8mjNpsxpD+hT2dPZY1GW5FTkke5yy3l 7YV8lD5VZEs4A== Date: Wed, 25 Mar 2026 07:23:37 +0100 From: Niklas Cassel To: Koichiro Den Cc: Jon Mason , Dave Jiang , Allen Hubbe , Manivannan Sadhasivam , Krzysztof =?utf-8?Q?Wilczy=C5=84ski?= , Kishon Vijay Abraham I , Bjorn Helgaas , Frank Li , Jerome Brunet , Lorenzo Pieralisi , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, ntb@lists.linux.dev Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 00/10] PCI: endpoint: pci-epf-vntb / NTB: epf: Enable per-doorbell bit handling Message-ID: References: <20260323031544.2598111-1-den@valinux.co.jp> <7jkibbdz3m3vuq2kq2xxnkt2rjdt5v7itgowc7qormtwgnf6tv@krl5brfjul5y> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <7jkibbdz3m3vuq2kq2xxnkt2rjdt5v7itgowc7qormtwgnf6tv@krl5brfjul5y> Hello Koichiro, On Tue, Mar 24, 2026 at 12:43:53AM +0900, Koichiro Den wrote: > > - configfs knobs mutability and bounds checking, including (but not limited to) > db_count. > In my opinion, allowing updates after .bind() looks questionable, and > returning -EBUSY once bound seems more appropriate. I'm leaning toward > handling this as a separate hardening series. This is in line with what we did for pci-epf-test, see commit: ffcc4850a161 ("PCI: endpoint: pci-epf-test: Allow overriding default BAR sizes") but we return EOPNOTSUPP instead of EBUSY. Kind regards, Niklas