From: cruzzhao <cruzzhao@linux.alibaba.com>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: mingo@redhat.com, juri.lelli@redhat.com,
vincent.guittot@linaro.org, dietmar.eggemann@arm.com,
rostedt@goodmis.org, bsegall@google.com, mgorman@suse.de,
bristot@redhat.com, vschneid@redhat.com,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] sched/core: Fix the bug that sched_core_find() may return throttled task
Date: Thu, 1 Sep 2022 17:59:11 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <acc065a2-9378-e4fe-9033-d46ebadf2d16@linux.alibaba.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <YxB1Eu9wTPel8LWu@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net>
在 2022/9/1 下午5:02, Peter Zijlstra 写道:
> On Wed, Aug 31, 2022 at 02:49:18PM +0800, Cruz Zhao wrote:
>> When a cfs_rq is throttled, the cookie'd task in this cfs_rq wouldn't
>> dequeue from the core tree, and sched_core_find() may return this task,
>> which will result that the throttled task running on the cpu.
>>
>> To resolve this problem, we pick the first cookie matched task and
>> unthrottled task.
>
> You mean: first that that both matches the cookie and is not throttled.
>
Yeah, I mean "the first cookie matched and not throttled task".
> Except I think you can have the same problem with the RT crud.
Sure, there's the same problem with the RT crud.
There's also a problem that the priority of the tasks in the core_tree
won't change since sched_core_enqueue(), but the priority of cfs tasks
will change as vruntime changes. And sched_core_find() may not pick the
cookie matched task with the highest priority.
I tried to combine the core_tree with cfs_rq (dl_rq, rt_rq should also
be considered) to solve this problem, but I haven't come up with a
simple and graceful solution yet.
prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-09-01 9:59 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-08-31 6:49 [PATCH] sched/core: Fix the bug that sched_core_find() may return throttled task Cruz Zhao
2022-09-01 9:02 ` Peter Zijlstra
2022-09-01 9:59 ` cruzzhao [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=acc065a2-9378-e4fe-9033-d46ebadf2d16@linux.alibaba.com \
--to=cruzzhao@linux.alibaba.com \
--cc=bristot@redhat.com \
--cc=bsegall@google.com \
--cc=dietmar.eggemann@arm.com \
--cc=juri.lelli@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mgorman@suse.de \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=vincent.guittot@linaro.org \
--cc=vschneid@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox