public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@kernel.org>
To: Greg KH <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Cc: Oskar Ray-Frayssinet <rayfraytech@gmail.com>,
	marvin24@gmx.de,  linux-staging@lists.linux.dev,
	linux-tegra@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] staging: nvec: fix block comment style in nvec.c
Date: Sat, 28 Mar 2026 01:21:40 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <accc-kOYHllCEnxi@orome> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <2026031833-pampers-steed-4804@gregkh>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1873 bytes --]

On Wed, Mar 18, 2026 at 03:59:43PM +0100, Greg KH wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 09, 2026 at 11:07:18PM +0100, Oskar Ray-Frayssinet wrote:
> > Fix block comment formatting to use * on subsequent lines
> > and */ on a separate line as required by kernel coding style.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Oskar Ray-Frayssinet <rayfraytech@gmail.com>
> > ---
> >  drivers/staging/nvec/nvec.c | 2 +-
> >  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/drivers/staging/nvec/nvec.c b/drivers/staging/nvec/nvec.c
> > index e70fafc095f2..0e655f79ea4a 100644
> > --- a/drivers/staging/nvec/nvec.c
> > +++ b/drivers/staging/nvec/nvec.c
> > @@ -659,7 +659,7 @@ static irqreturn_t nvec_interrupt(int irq, void *dev)
> >  			nvec_tx_set(nvec);
> >  			to_send = nvec->tx->data[0];
> >  			nvec->tx->pos = 1;
> > -			/* Delay ACK due to AP20 HW Bug
> > +			/* delay ACK due to AP20 HW Bug
> >  			 * do not replace by usleep_range
> >  			 */
> >  			udelay(33);
> > -- 
> > 2.43.0
> > 
> > 
> 
> This change is not what you documented is changing :(

Hm... this is the 8th version of this patch that I've seen.

I don't know why there was a flurry of these. The checkpatch warning
certainly isn't new, so maybe this was a new wave of janitors or
something? Or maybe people using AI agents to get into kernel
development. Not that it matters much, but it's not a pattern that I've
seen before.

Also, the fact that 7 out of the 8 versions came in after the first had
already landed in linux-next:

  29e79c66b3cc ("staging: nvec: fix block comment style in nvec_interrupt()")

suggests that people aren't using linux-next as their baseline. Do we
need to be stricter in this regard? Seems a bit wasteful for you to have
to spend so much time looking at duplicates, even though it seems like
your automation did a lot of the work.

Thierry

[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 833 bytes --]

      parent reply	other threads:[~2026-03-28  0:21 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-03-04 19:18 [PATCH] staging: nvec: fix block comment style in nvec.c Oskar Ray-Frayssinet
2026-03-09 16:40 ` Greg KH
2026-03-09 22:07   ` [PATCH v3] " Oskar Ray-Frayssinet
2026-03-18 14:59     ` Greg KH
2026-03-18 21:46       ` Oskar Ray-Frayssinet
2026-03-28  0:21       ` Thierry Reding [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=accc-kOYHllCEnxi@orome \
    --to=thierry.reding@kernel.org \
    --cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-staging@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=linux-tegra@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=marvin24@gmx.de \
    --cc=rayfraytech@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox