From: Yi Liu <yi.l.liu@intel.com>
To: "Tian, Kevin" <kevin.tian@intel.com>,
"joro@8bytes.org" <joro@8bytes.org>,
"alex.williamson@redhat.com" <alex.williamson@redhat.com>,
"jgg@nvidia.com" <jgg@nvidia.com>,
"robin.murphy@arm.com" <robin.murphy@arm.com>,
"baolu.lu@linux.intel.com" <baolu.lu@linux.intel.com>
Cc: "cohuck@redhat.com" <cohuck@redhat.com>,
"eric.auger@redhat.com" <eric.auger@redhat.com>,
"nicolinc@nvidia.com" <nicolinc@nvidia.com>,
"kvm@vger.kernel.org" <kvm@vger.kernel.org>,
"mjrosato@linux.ibm.com" <mjrosato@linux.ibm.com>,
"chao.p.peng@linux.intel.com" <chao.p.peng@linux.intel.com>,
"yi.y.sun@linux.intel.com" <yi.y.sun@linux.intel.com>,
"peterx@redhat.com" <peterx@redhat.com>,
"jasowang@redhat.com" <jasowang@redhat.com>,
"shameerali.kolothum.thodi@huawei.com"
<shameerali.kolothum.thodi@huawei.com>,
"lulu@redhat.com" <lulu@redhat.com>,
"suravee.suthikulpanit@amd.com" <suravee.suthikulpanit@amd.com>,
"iommu@lists.linux.dev" <iommu@lists.linux.dev>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org"
<linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org>,
"Duan, Zhenzhong" <zhenzhong.duan@intel.com>,
"joao.m.martins@oracle.com" <joao.m.martins@oracle.com>,
"Zeng, Xin" <xin.zeng@intel.com>,
"Zhao, Yan Y" <yan.y.zhao@intel.com>,
"j.granados@samsung.com" <j.granados@samsung.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 2/9] iommufd: Add IOMMU_HWPT_INVALIDATE
Date: Tue, 26 Dec 2023 12:00:59 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <acf7dabb-d9b0-4601-868b-03cfff10a206@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <BN9PR11MB5276A3AFF358A0E822AD22B08C94A@BN9PR11MB5276.namprd11.prod.outlook.com>
On 2023/12/22 11:19, Tian, Kevin wrote:
>> From: Liu, Yi L <yi.l.liu@intel.com>
>> Sent: Thursday, December 21, 2023 11:40 PM
>> +
>> +int iommufd_hwpt_invalidate(struct iommufd_ucmd *ucmd)
>> +{
>> + struct iommu_hwpt_invalidate *cmd = ucmd->cmd;
>> + struct iommu_user_data_array data_array = {
>> + .type = cmd->req_type,
>> + .uptr = u64_to_user_ptr(cmd->reqs_uptr),
>> + .entry_len = cmd->req_len,
>> + .entry_num = cmd->req_num,
>> + };
>> + struct iommufd_hw_pagetable *hwpt;
>> + u32 done_num = 0;
>> + int rc;
>> +
>> + if (cmd->req_num && (!cmd->reqs_uptr || !cmd->req_len)) {
>> + rc = -EINVAL;
>> + goto out;
>> + }
>
> miss a check on the __reserved field.
done.
>
>> @@ -323,6 +323,7 @@ union ucmd_buffer {
>> struct iommu_hwpt_alloc hwpt;
>> struct iommu_hwpt_get_dirty_bitmap get_dirty_bitmap;
>> struct iommu_hwpt_set_dirty_tracking set_dirty_tracking;
>> + struct iommu_hwpt_invalidate cache;
>
> this should be in alphabetic order. I gave this comment in v6 too:
>
> https://lore.kernel.org/linux-iommu/BN9PR11MB5276D8406BF08B853329288C8CB4A@BN9PR11MB5276.namprd11.prod.outlook.com/
oops, I did miss it. sigh, I paid too much attention to the error code
discussion in the end. :( I've revisited the comments and should have
done now.
>> +/**
>> + * enum iommu_hwpt_invalidate_data_type - IOMMU HWPT Cache
>> Invalidation
>> + * Data Type
>> + * @IOMMU_HWPT_INVALIDATE_DATA_VTD_S1: Invalidation data for
>> VTD_S1
>> + */
>> +enum iommu_hwpt_invalidate_data_type {
>> + IOMMU_HWPT_INVALIDATE_DATA_VTD_S1,
>> +};
>
> Defining DATA_VTD_S1 at this point is fine, if there is no usage on
> DATA_NONE. But following vtd specific definitions should be moved
> to the later vtd specific patches. they are not used by the common
> code anyway.
sure.
>> +
>> +/**
>> + * enum iommu_hwpt_vtd_s1_invalidate_flags - Flags for Intel VT-d
>> + * stage-1 cache invalidation
>> + * @IOMMU_VTD_INV_FLAGS_LEAF: The LEAF flag indicates whether only
>> the
>> + * leaf PTE caching needs to be invalidated
>> + * and other paging structure caches can be
>> + * preserved.
>
> "indicates whether the invalidation applies to all-levels page structure
> cache or just the leaf PTE cache"
done.
>> + */
>> +enum iommu_hwpt_vtd_s1_invalidate_flags {
>> + IOMMU_VTD_INV_FLAGS_LEAF = 1 << 0,
>> +};
>> +
>> +/**
>> + * enum iommu_hwpt_vtd_s1_invalidate_error - Result of invalidation
>
> "hardware error of invalidation"
done.
>
>> + * @IOMMU_HWPT_INVALIDATE_VTD_S1_ICE: Invalidation Completion
>> Error, details
>> + * refer to 11.4.7.1 Fault Status Register
>> + * of VT-d specification.
>> + * @IOMMU_HWPT_INVALIDATE_VTD_S1_ITE: Invalidation Time-out Error,
>> details
>> + * refer to 11.4.7.1 Fault Status Register
>> + * of VT-d specification.
>> + */
>> +enum iommu_hwpt_vtd_s1_invalidate_error {
>> + IOMMU_HWPT_INVALIDATE_VTD_S1_ICE = 1 << 0,
>> + IOMMU_HWPT_INVALIDATE_VTD_S1_ITE = 1 << 1,
>> +};
>> +
>> +/**
>> + * struct iommu_hwpt_vtd_s1_invalidate - Intel VT-d cache invalidation
>> + * (IOMMU_HWPT_INVALIDATE_DATA_VTD_S1)
>> + * @addr: The start address of the addresses to be invalidated. It needs
>> + * to be 4KB aligned.
>
> 'of the range'
done.
>
>> + * @npages: Number of contiguous 4K pages to be invalidated.
>> + * @flags: Combination of enum iommu_hwpt_vtd_s1_invalidate_flags
>> + * @inv_error: One of enum iommu_hwpt_vtd_s1_invalidate_error
>
> '@hw_error'
done.
>> + *
>> + * The Intel VT-d specific invalidation data for user-managed stage-1 cache
>> + * invalidation in nested translation. Userspace uses this structure to
>> + * tell the impacted cache scope after modifying the stage-1 page table.
>> + *
>> + * Invalidating all the caches related to the page table by setting @addr
>> + * to be 0 and @npages to be U64_MAX.
>
> here should clarify that the invalidation applies to device TLB automatically
> for VT-d.
done.
>> + *
>> + * @inv_error is meaningful only if the request is handled by kernel. This
>> + * can be known by checking struct iommu_hwpt_invalidate::req_num
>> output.
>> + * @inv_error only covers the errors detected by hardware after submitting
>> the
>> + * invalidation. The software detected errors would go through the normal
>> + * ioctl errno.
>> + */
>> +struct iommu_hwpt_vtd_s1_invalidate {
>> + __aligned_u64 addr;
>> + __aligned_u64 npages;
>> + __u32 flags;
>> + __u32 inv_error;
>> +};
>> +
>> +/**
>> + * struct iommu_hwpt_invalidate - ioctl(IOMMU_HWPT_INVALIDATE)
>> + * @size: sizeof(struct iommu_hwpt_invalidate)
>> + * @hwpt_id: HWPT ID of a nested HWPT for cache invalidation
>> + * @reqs_uptr: User pointer to an array having @req_num of cache
>> invalidation
>> + * requests. The request entries in the array are of fixed width
>> + * @req_len, and contain a user data structure for invalidation
>> + * request specific to the given hardware page table.
>
> Just:
>
> 'User pointer to an array of driver-specific cache invalidation requests'
done.
>> + * @req_type: One of enum iommu_hwpt_invalidate_data_type, defining
>> the data
>> + * type of all the entries in the invalidation request array. It
>> + * should be a type supported by the hwpt pointed by @hwpt_id.
>> + * @req_len: Length (in bytes) of a request entry in the request array
>> + * @req_num: Input the number of cache invalidation requests in the array.
s/req_len/entry_len, s/req_num/entry_num per the comments in last version.
>> + * Output the number of requests successfully handled by kernel.
>> + * @__reserved: Must be 0.
>> + *
>> + * Invalidate the iommu cache for user-managed page table. Modifications
>> on a
>> + * user-managed page table should be followed by this operation to sync
>> cache.
>> + * Each ioctl can support one or more cache invalidation requests in the
>> array
>> + * that has a total size of @req_len * @req_num.
>> + *
>> + * An empty invalidation request array by setting @req_num==0 is allowed,
>> and
>> + * @req_len and @reqs_uptr would be ignored in this case. This can be
>> used to
>> + * check if the given @req_type is supported or not by kernel.
>> + */
>> +struct iommu_hwpt_invalidate {
>> + __u32 size;
>> + __u32 hwpt_id;
>> + __aligned_u64 reqs_uptr;
>> + __u32 req_type;
>> + __u32 req_len;
>> + __u32 req_num;
>> + __u32 __reserved;
>> +};
>> +#define IOMMU_HWPT_INVALIDATE _IO(IOMMUFD_TYPE,
>> IOMMUFD_CMD_HWPT_INVALIDATE)
>> #endif
>> --
>> 2.34.1
>
--
Regards,
Yi Liu
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-12-26 3:58 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 45+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-12-21 15:39 [PATCH v7 0/9] Add iommufd nesting (part 2/2) Yi Liu
2023-12-21 15:39 ` [PATCH v7 1/9] iommu: Add cache_invalidate_user op Yi Liu
2023-12-22 2:30 ` Tian, Kevin
2023-12-26 2:24 ` Yi Liu
2023-12-21 15:39 ` [PATCH v7 2/9] iommufd: Add IOMMU_HWPT_INVALIDATE Yi Liu
2023-12-22 3:19 ` Tian, Kevin
2023-12-26 4:00 ` Yi Liu [this message]
2023-12-21 15:39 ` [PATCH v7 3/9] iommu: Add iommu_copy_struct_from_user_array helper Yi Liu
2023-12-22 3:25 ` Tian, Kevin
2023-12-21 15:39 ` [PATCH v7 4/9] iommufd/selftest: Add mock_domain_cache_invalidate_user support Yi Liu
2023-12-22 3:39 ` Tian, Kevin
2023-12-26 3:35 ` Yi Liu
2023-12-21 15:39 ` [PATCH v7 5/9] iommufd/selftest: Add IOMMU_TEST_OP_MD_CHECK_IOTLB test op Yi Liu
2023-12-22 4:01 ` Tian, Kevin
2023-12-21 15:39 ` [PATCH v7 6/9] iommufd/selftest: Add coverage for IOMMU_HWPT_INVALIDATE ioctl Yi Liu
2023-12-22 4:09 ` Tian, Kevin
2023-12-26 4:01 ` Yi Liu
2023-12-21 15:39 ` [PATCH v7 7/9] iommu/vt-d: Allow qi_submit_sync() to return the QI faults Yi Liu
2023-12-22 4:23 ` Tian, Kevin
2023-12-26 4:03 ` Yi Liu
2023-12-26 4:13 ` Tian, Kevin
2023-12-26 6:15 ` Yi Liu
2023-12-26 8:44 ` Yi Liu
2023-12-26 9:21 ` Tian, Kevin
2023-12-27 9:06 ` Duan, Zhenzhong
2023-12-27 9:33 ` Ethan Zhao
2023-12-27 14:12 ` Yi Liu
2023-12-28 5:39 ` Tian, Kevin
2023-12-21 15:39 ` [PATCH v7 8/9] iommu/vt-d: Convert pasid based cache invalidation to return QI fault Yi Liu
2023-12-22 6:04 ` Tian, Kevin
2023-12-26 4:14 ` Yi Liu
2023-12-21 15:39 ` [PATCH v7 9/9] iommu/vt-d: Add iotlb flush for nested domain Yi Liu
2023-12-22 3:56 ` Yang, Weijiang
2023-12-22 6:47 ` Tian, Kevin
2023-12-22 7:01 ` Liu, Yi L
2023-12-22 7:12 ` Tian, Kevin
2023-12-22 11:59 ` Liu, Yi L
2023-12-26 8:46 ` Yi Liu
2023-12-22 7:00 ` Liu, Yi L
2023-12-22 6:57 ` Tian, Kevin
2023-12-26 4:51 ` Yi Liu
2023-12-26 6:11 ` Tian, Kevin
2023-12-26 12:35 ` Yi Liu
2023-12-27 9:27 ` Duan, Zhenzhong
2023-12-27 14:14 ` Yi Liu
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=acf7dabb-d9b0-4601-868b-03cfff10a206@intel.com \
--to=yi.l.liu@intel.com \
--cc=alex.williamson@redhat.com \
--cc=baolu.lu@linux.intel.com \
--cc=chao.p.peng@linux.intel.com \
--cc=cohuck@redhat.com \
--cc=eric.auger@redhat.com \
--cc=iommu@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=j.granados@samsung.com \
--cc=jasowang@redhat.com \
--cc=jgg@nvidia.com \
--cc=joao.m.martins@oracle.com \
--cc=joro@8bytes.org \
--cc=kevin.tian@intel.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lulu@redhat.com \
--cc=mjrosato@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=nicolinc@nvidia.com \
--cc=peterx@redhat.com \
--cc=robin.murphy@arm.com \
--cc=shameerali.kolothum.thodi@huawei.com \
--cc=suravee.suthikulpanit@amd.com \
--cc=xin.zeng@intel.com \
--cc=yan.y.zhao@intel.com \
--cc=yi.y.sun@linux.intel.com \
--cc=zhenzhong.duan@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox