public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Teng Liu <27rabbitlt@gmail.com>
To: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Cc: linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org, dsterba@suse.com, clm@fb.com,
	 linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] btrfs: wait for in-flight readahead BIOs on open_ctree() error
Date: Mon, 30 Mar 2026 20:00:12 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <acq5Y9VuDI9htA-I@rabbitArch> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <840361b6-9b27-4419-b8ab-891ab254fac9@suse.com>

On 2026-03-30 08:51, Qu Wenruo wrote:
> 
> 
> 在 2026/3/30 08:36, Qu Wenruo 写道:
> > 
> > 
> > Even you wait for all bios, it can still cause problems.
> > 
> > As the bio counter is only for btrfs bio layer, we still have
> > btrfs_bio::end_io called after btrfs_bio_counter_dec().
> > 
> > And if the full fs_info has been freed, then at end_bbio_meta_read(), we
> > can still have problems as btrfs_validate_extent_buffer() will access eb
> > (bbio->private) and fs_info (eb->fs_info), which triggers use after
> > free.
> > 
> > So using that bio counter is not going to solve all problems, but only
> > reducing the race window thus masking the problem.
> > 
> > 
> > The following ideas come up to me, but neither seems as simple as your
> > current one:
> > 
> > 1) Introduce a dedicated counter for metadata readahead/reads
> >     This seems to be the simplest one among all.
> >     But the only usage is only the error handling, thus may not be
> >     worthy.
> > 
> > 2) Disable metadata readahead during open_ctree()
> >     Which will delay the mount, especially for large extent tree without
> >     bgt feature.
> > 
> > 3) Use buffer_tree xarray to iterate through all ebs
> >     Since this is only for error handling of open_ctree(), we're fine to
> >     do the full xarray iteration, and wait for any eb that has
> >     EXTENT_BUFFER_READING flag.
> > 
> >     The problem is, we do not have a dedicated tag like
> >     PAGECACHE_TAG_(TOWRITE|DIRTY) to easily catch all dirty/writeback
> >     ebs.
> >     So the only option is to go through each eb and check their flags.
> > 
> >     I think this is the one with minimal impact, but may cause much
> >     longer runtime during this error handling path.
> > 
> > My personal preference is option 3).
> 
> Or the 4th one, which is only an idea and I haven't yet verified:
> 
> 4) Handle error from invalidate_inode_pages2()
>    Currently we just call invalidate_inode_pages2() on btree inode and
>    expect it to return 0.
> 
>    But if there is still an eb reading pending, it will make that
>    function to return -EBUSY, as try_release_extent_buffer() will
>    find a eb whose refs is not 0, and refuse the release that eb which
>    belongs to a folio.
> 
>    That should be a good indicator of any pending metadata reads.
> 
>    So if that invalidate_inode_pages2() returned -EBUSY, we should wait
>    retry until it returns 0.
> 
> 

Thanks! Yes, it makes sense, simply waiting on the bio counter doesnt
fix the problem here. 

Among the options, I prefer option 3. Although it may be slower, but it
only happens in mount failure path so extra cost seems acceptable.

I am quite new to btrfs codebase so I dont know whether
`invalidate_inode_pages2()` would be a reliable solution so maybe I
should start with option 3?



  reply	other threads:[~2026-03-30 18:00 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-03-29  6:31 [PATCH] btrfs: wait for in-flight readahead BIOs on open_ctree() error Teng Liu
2026-03-29  7:03 ` Qu Wenruo
2026-03-29 17:23   ` Teng Liu
2026-03-29 22:06     ` Qu Wenruo
2026-03-29 22:21       ` Qu Wenruo
2026-03-30 18:00         ` Teng Liu [this message]
2026-03-30 21:48           ` Qu Wenruo
2026-03-30 22:14             ` Qu Wenruo

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=acq5Y9VuDI9htA-I@rabbitArch \
    --to=27rabbitlt@gmail.com \
    --cc=clm@fb.com \
    --cc=dsterba@suse.com \
    --cc=linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=wqu@suse.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox