From: Jiri Olsa <olsajiri@gmail.com>
To: Varun R Mallya <varunrmallya@gmail.com>
Cc: andrii@kernel.org, alan.maguire@oracle.com,
yonghong.song@linux.dev, song@kernel.org, bpf@vger.kernel.org,
ast@kernel.org, daniel@iogearbox.net, memxor@gmail.com,
eddyz87@gmail.com, martin.lau@linux.dev,
menglong8.dong@gmail.com, puranjay@kernel.org, bjorn@kernel.org,
leon.hwang@linux.dev, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH bpf-next v2 2/3] libbpf: Add FEAT_KPROBE_MULTI_LINK feature probe.
Date: Mon, 30 Mar 2026 16:52:46 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <acqOPsDCKHIrH1HT@krava> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260330110019.549079-3-varunrmallya@gmail.com>
On Mon, Mar 30, 2026 at 04:30:18PM +0530, Varun R Mallya wrote:
> Add FEAT_KPROBE_MULTI_LINK, similar to UPROBE_MULTI_LINK
> by loading and creating a link for a small BPF program with
> BPF_TRACE_KPROBE_MULTI as the expected attach type, and
> then checking the success of the operation.
>
> Signed-off-by: Varun R Mallya <varunrmallya@gmail.com>
> ---
> tools/lib/bpf/features.c | 37 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> tools/lib/bpf/libbpf_internal.h | 2 ++
> 2 files changed, 39 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/tools/lib/bpf/features.c b/tools/lib/bpf/features.c
> index adcad221c601..13227c9ea69d 100644
> --- a/tools/lib/bpf/features.c
> +++ b/tools/lib/bpf/features.c
> @@ -424,6 +424,40 @@ static int probe_uprobe_multi_link(int token_fd)
> return link_fd < 0 && err == -EINVAL;
> }
>
> +static int probe_kprobe_multi_link(int token_fd)
> +{
> + LIBBPF_OPTS(bpf_prog_load_opts, load_opts,
> + .expected_attach_type = BPF_TRACE_KPROBE_MULTI,
> + .token_fd = token_fd,
> + .prog_flags = token_fd ? BPF_F_TOKEN_FD : 0,
> + );
> + LIBBPF_OPTS(bpf_link_create_opts, link_opts);
> + struct bpf_insn insns[] = {
> + BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_0, 0),
> + BPF_EXIT_INSN(),
> + };
> + int prog_fd, link_fd, err;
> + const char *sym = "bpf_map_lookup_elem"; /* stable, always present */
> +
> + prog_fd = bpf_prog_load(BPF_PROG_TYPE_KPROBE, NULL, "GPL",
> + insns, ARRAY_SIZE(insns), &load_opts);
> + if (prog_fd < 0)
> + return -errno;
> +
> + /* attaching to a valid symbol should succeed */
> + link_opts.kprobe_multi.syms = &sym;
> + link_opts.kprobe_multi.cnt = 1;
maybe we could set cnt > MAX_KPROBE_MULTI_CNT and check if the fail
is E2BIG ? this could save some cycles, but haven't tried that
jirka
> + link_fd = bpf_link_create(prog_fd, -1, BPF_TRACE_KPROBE_MULTI, &link_opts);
> + err = -errno;
> + if (link_fd >= 0)
> + close(link_fd);
> + close(prog_fd);
> + /* if kprobe_multi is supported, link creation either succeeds or
> + * fails with something other than -EINVAL due to permissions,
> + */
> + return link_fd >= 0 || (err != -EINVAL);
> +}
> +
SNIP
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-03-30 14:52 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-03-30 11:00 [RFC PATCH bpf-next v2 0/3] Upgrading uprobe and kprobe to their `multi` counterparts Varun R Mallya
2026-03-30 11:00 ` [RFC PATCH bpf-next v2 1/3] libbpf: Auto-upgrade uprobes to multi-uprobes when supported Varun R Mallya
2026-03-30 11:47 ` bot+bpf-ci
2026-03-30 14:52 ` Jiri Olsa
2026-04-01 9:56 ` Varun R Mallya
2026-03-30 11:00 ` [RFC PATCH bpf-next v2 2/3] libbpf: Add FEAT_KPROBE_MULTI_LINK feature probe Varun R Mallya
2026-03-30 14:42 ` Leon Hwang
2026-04-01 9:57 ` Varun R Mallya
2026-03-30 14:52 ` Jiri Olsa [this message]
2026-04-01 9:49 ` Varun R Mallya
2026-03-30 11:00 ` [RFC PATCH bpf-next v2 3/3] libbpf: Auto-upgrade kprobes to multi-kprobes when supported Varun R Mallya
2026-03-30 11:47 ` bot+bpf-ci
2026-04-01 9:59 ` Varun R Mallya
2026-03-30 14:53 ` Jiri Olsa
2026-04-01 10:53 ` Varun R Mallya
2026-04-01 11:11 ` Varun R Mallya
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=acqOPsDCKHIrH1HT@krava \
--to=olsajiri@gmail.com \
--cc=alan.maguire@oracle.com \
--cc=andrii@kernel.org \
--cc=ast@kernel.org \
--cc=bjorn@kernel.org \
--cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
--cc=eddyz87@gmail.com \
--cc=leon.hwang@linux.dev \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=martin.lau@linux.dev \
--cc=memxor@gmail.com \
--cc=menglong8.dong@gmail.com \
--cc=puranjay@kernel.org \
--cc=song@kernel.org \
--cc=varunrmallya@gmail.com \
--cc=yonghong.song@linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox