Re: [PATCH v1 2/2] media: atomisp: remove redundant call to ia_css_output0_configure()

["Jose A. Perez de Azpillaga" <azpijr@gmail.com>]

On Mon, Mar 30, 2026 at 12:35:34PM +0300, Dan Carpenter wrote:
> On Sat, Mar 28, 2026 at 08:21:38PM +0100, Jose A. Perez de Azpillaga wrote:
> > The function configure_isp_from_args() contained a duplicate call to
> > ia_css_output0_configure() using the same output frame index. Remove
> > the redundant call to simplify the configuration path.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Jose A. Perez de Azpillaga <azpijr@gmail.com>
> > ---
>
> This feels like a guess work patch.  Sure, it looks like duplicate
> code but duplicate code isn't always wrong.  How do you know which
> call to remove?  How do you know that it's not a copy and paste error
> and the right fix is just to change the code instead of deleting it?
>

my response here would be something similar to Andy's one.

> Patch 1 felt like an AI patch, and this patch feels even more strongly
> like an AI patch.
>

ouch.

> Please don't send guess work patches or if you do add a giant comment
> at the bottom saying --- "This patch is a GUESS.  Review carefully!
> Untested"
>

okay, I wasn't aware of that. I'll try to add that comment or better
yet, not trying to fix things without the actual hardware. thanks.

...

regards,
jose a. p-a