From: Nicolin Chen <nicolinc@nvidia.com>
To: "Tian, Kevin" <kevin.tian@intel.com>
Cc: Shuai Xue <xueshuai@linux.alibaba.com>,
"joro@8bytes.org" <joro@8bytes.org>,
"will@kernel.org" <will@kernel.org>,
"robin.murphy@arm.com" <robin.murphy@arm.com>,
"baolu.lu@linux.intel.com" <baolu.lu@linux.intel.com>,
"jgg@nvidia.com" <jgg@nvidia.com>,
"iommu@lists.linux.dev" <iommu@lists.linux.dev>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH rc v2] iommu: Fix nested pci_dev_reset_iommu_prepare/done()
Date: Tue, 31 Mar 2026 05:23:25 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <acu8ve3mJ0loitQS@nvidia.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <BN9PR11MB52763033F10069ECD005AAB08C53A@BN9PR11MB5276.namprd11.prod.outlook.com>
On Tue, Mar 31, 2026 at 07:12:19AM +0000, Tian, Kevin wrote:
> > > > > - prepare() only detaches the specific pdev, leaving other
> > > > > devices in the group still attached to the original domain
> > >
> > > no, attach is per-group. all devices are changed together.
> >
> > I think prepare() should use the per-device ops:
> > ops->attach_dev (via __iommu_attach_device)
> > ops->set_dev_pasid
> > right?
>
> it's per-device op but the condition of calling it is per-group:
>
> if (group->domain != group->blocking_domain) {
> ret = __iommu_attach_device(group->blocking_domain, &pdev->dev,
> group->domain);
> if (ret)
> return ret;
> }
If the group->domain is not blocking_domain, this device will
move away from group->domain to blocking_domain, while other
device (in the same group) are staying in group->domain. No?
> > And it is intended to limit to the resetting device only. Other
> > devices in the group can still stay in the attached domain, but
> > they cannot do new attachment (-EBUSY) because that's per-group.
>
> how could other devices stay in the attached domain?
We call __iommu_attach_device only on one gdev, not looping
the entire group, right?
> > Since prepare() is per-device, the per-group reset_cnt wouldn't
> > be sufficient if one device is resetting while the other isn't.
> >
> > iommu_driver_get_domain_for_dev() for example would return the
> > blocking_domain for both devices, but physically only the first
> > device is attached to blocking_domain.
>
> what do you mean by 'physically'?
I mean SMMU driver will program STE to ask SMMU HW to reflect
the change "physically". But it won't program the other STEs.
Nicolin
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-03-31 12:23 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-03-19 4:31 [PATCH rc v2] iommu: Fix nested pci_dev_reset_iommu_prepare/done() Nicolin Chen
2026-03-19 11:14 ` Shuai Xue
2026-03-19 21:34 ` Nicolin Chen
2026-03-27 8:27 ` Tian, Kevin
2026-03-27 21:08 ` Nicolin Chen
2026-03-31 7:12 ` Tian, Kevin
2026-03-31 12:23 ` Nicolin Chen [this message]
2026-04-01 8:14 ` Tian, Kevin
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=acu8ve3mJ0loitQS@nvidia.com \
--to=nicolinc@nvidia.com \
--cc=baolu.lu@linux.intel.com \
--cc=iommu@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=jgg@nvidia.com \
--cc=joro@8bytes.org \
--cc=kevin.tian@intel.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=robin.murphy@arm.com \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
--cc=xueshuai@linux.alibaba.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox