From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from foss.arm.com (foss.arm.com [217.140.110.172]) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9378CC2FD; Wed, 1 Apr 2026 11:01:05 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=217.140.110.172 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1775041266; cv=none; b=mZdSUtN4yjFcVvzfAmezZHDZ3tIzsxwWbdp9VLm7aNSPG3ujNLKOfhxcLVfJ63PHRvlOKecwDd7r41GfSH9zFZsHpb7AtUZQ5WviQ5k7N0nmsRpLfCJZ1gBJtfXPQ6AjbZijDMszbB9l6koGvfh151Y7RCr7PfJDt3LByQobo2o= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1775041266; c=relaxed/simple; bh=0CDOI2eJCoNEnbrA0KkK7IgYz3OYddwXFGRDwAvNIq8=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=bNirO3K0mLJXd0PW7ZoXH7vR8FM6nfLFS8lgD017XjgSeJ+o1/tdP0JZI+HC/TxRBqm1IBNWYUblblEBPh0b4d2BrjZY7UgAsR8WOuHZWc3eKSyBU/js+rFLam/bc3Aq+LzqJ5xBPhlwZByxJ1VpKlt3z80GfOl1Gipp7z8yh5o= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=arm.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=arm.com; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=arm.com header.i=@arm.com header.b=RqXk2gRv; arc=none smtp.client-ip=217.140.110.172 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=arm.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=arm.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=arm.com header.i=@arm.com header.b="RqXk2gRv" Received: from usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (unknown [10.121.207.14]) by usa-sjc-mx-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2C9771692; Wed, 1 Apr 2026 04:00:59 -0700 (PDT) Received: from arm.com (usa-sjc-mx-foss1.foss.arm.com [172.31.20.19]) by usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id D63A63F915; Wed, 1 Apr 2026 04:01:03 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=arm.com; s=foss; t=1775041265; bh=0CDOI2eJCoNEnbrA0KkK7IgYz3OYddwXFGRDwAvNIq8=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=RqXk2gRvHzPhXCFfzL+5VvuZAH/pEtHdAVcJGM5ZjhTzl+ukkuoKD+FUZzOZZZPlY /G5Z74iz2WW9WCH5+XZfiILLVTxVcVfhTdVDVG6T7U+dcGtKmXEn1aeqZSCD8a+ZbR bU1Pnmj0BHDUxKodujYt3fwdvlrxL5QBJf/7C3hk= Date: Wed, 1 Apr 2026 12:01:00 +0100 From: Catalin Marinas To: Mark Brown Cc: Will Deacon , Linux Kernel Mailing List , Linux Next Mailing List , Marc Zyngier , Yeoreum Yun , Zenghui Yu Subject: Re: linux-next: manual merge of the arm64 tree with the kvm-arm tree Message-ID: References: Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: On Fri, Mar 27, 2026 at 06:44:58PM +0000, Mark Brown wrote: > diff --cc arch/arm64/kvm/at.c > index a024d9a770dc74,1adf88a5732840..00000000000000 > --- a/arch/arm64/kvm/at.c > +++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/at.c > @@@ -1753,8 -1785,10 +1783,10 @@@ int __kvm_at_swap_desc(struct kvm *kvm > if (!writable) > return -EPERM; > > - ptep = (u64 __user *)hva + offset; > + ptep = (void __user *)hva + offset; > - if (cpus_have_final_cap(ARM64_HAS_LSE_ATOMICS)) > + if (cpus_have_final_cap(ARM64_HAS_LSUI)) > + r = __lsui_swap_desc(ptep, old, new); > + else if (cpus_have_final_cap(ARM64_HAS_LSE_ATOMICS)) > r = __lse_swap_desc(ptep, old, new); > else > r = __llsc_swap_desc(ptep, old, new); It looks fine. Thanks Mark. -- Catalin