From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mail-wm1-f48.google.com (mail-wm1-f48.google.com [209.85.128.48]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9D47435C1B7 for ; Wed, 1 Apr 2026 10:18:22 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=209.85.128.48 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1775038708; cv=none; b=ByS34DoYO/oXyeIhQtnUv8SKJeSQxrZyg8+OibX6YpFPeHCDOg4sW08HLTUZOsyq26mgUhqyrJ94w5tigDk8aQ+QwPvB2UBA1l45eoIsy22ouNfSQC9XPmIdzMOUZBFr1Zf2YiXwJeuxd2ZrnRsQQPpJOzbN1fDT4niWg1Ey+A0= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1775038708; c=relaxed/simple; bh=Z/RHnPF7DEhm5hJg9nz9CxlPsF/x9Zd1aLxhKGn6DoM=; h=From:Date:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=hguWKmwMXGTgp1lNg+I0f/hvY0VjYGxDRenoVdIwwu9FoxqK69hbtyhOR4VCAr0iNhtmbcTjmiNVBR2ekftDfkvcmdoO2z8d03z1fKEjOHFVsmT7rhcqZQMZFH5hC5FNL/Jf0eoB0dX0/D6mVMEQz83SWvPGpMnEKeAvIgZIfvE= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=gmail.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=gmail.com; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com header.i=@gmail.com header.b=HPMOpcqb; arc=none smtp.client-ip=209.85.128.48 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=gmail.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=gmail.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com header.i=@gmail.com header.b="HPMOpcqb" Received: by mail-wm1-f48.google.com with SMTP id 5b1f17b1804b1-4887eca00c4so11294245e9.2 for ; Wed, 01 Apr 2026 03:18:22 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20251104; t=1775038699; x=1775643499; darn=vger.kernel.org; h=in-reply-to:content-disposition:mime-version:references:message-id :subject:cc:to:date:from:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=claFTSt439IgZWBE01BixnVIaXDxsHvpAK6NnSOUn5c=; b=HPMOpcqbM7joWHV8JoAZ6d2AyE7eb4zIKHxkjUV3KqItWGAVKQSqBjpSybxJ0qS0Go ZRIzeFcDnoDbtHtFKQdMuPm53OTBwazhwrCPkuHnYc7G3wZAYppuFXdijroPOMRuH8BI caF7zlVupIj7Ce/fSdBb2ifEt8vHBS5iwTqptcvFuY8ywvb5L+uQMAzSRzGr56S+tJl7 ffm9DBr5qxPX5eGi9J9GUp+po6GndFdloj1SZM110UUoNNL13wolPzAnpemIP2D62D0W jn/Q7Uj2vFnVa/doVJJZsQLRtd9HgS+1UCzkg4CKtswztZNfdupzKFCnnodL28/C5i8H CVmA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20251104; t=1775038699; x=1775643499; h=in-reply-to:content-disposition:mime-version:references:message-id :subject:cc:to:date:from:x-gm-gg:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc :subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=claFTSt439IgZWBE01BixnVIaXDxsHvpAK6NnSOUn5c=; b=oGI/hls2cRiDckHTVe6GEJ5WPEgLXo5ycAbLotd8geSiHafEMk0KfafgZek4RtDjbn tEZQjRpcW+mpQvi0wZg3OrlbkM/2ccYqGltIeJZBOSxz4QCzGY936ygCkdm7cipEkgOF If1LaPTJLuRgSMDrFr+3PvaxiV0vRZ0j96g1GLkhJn/zQMVwTGt51pNJjgxYLfHxIjV7 Tr3cwy8RAFXF0xNJk31nmWu4g/2wZoM7BEGOMQpXn2YqRUEEC4nNIBhCFauK7ZE3q2IU tbjE5tuS5u68z8bUyOCtJPT7Tc9iPyaQwopgYmIElPOKk9KPTnuZrv3ATZZm2VQZB1XT wYCw== X-Forwarded-Encrypted: i=1; AJvYcCVGhCC5E41cPJiPAMX+b7U/bzj3zGbqPOIkxF2Ia7vdi/8cFHkRW/sw/QSfJuFN3VhJrCyRwXFkl7KBnR0=@vger.kernel.org X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0Yx+lg9NyOjCYSx7tQ02KuEV5v3djiBYfzvknmSKSX5GJJQv/gqb EaigqmtuI2jO8zlRAMaPbsXKjUcvJy+7+aGYlRxfEgkr5QSMnzIRs3ku X-Gm-Gg: ATEYQzxfj4uKyRf/SECkAt0qVxlziNmgpNO8r9tKZYRcf2XM59HQntczOCxpH1G8I4j +W2iO3DvDzYT/WV+K+bYaI1lr2foJ6Fn/0aNM/Z04Wg+WLglt9lL3+Iak7aNBNua0Y03/pJ594c VmfgoBsNFBATlV9wNW8R7EintD6ni56uInDZppQz7vGsM3SYqN6ZPS8923LEz3Mp0H2ru9pSENm DJ7Y7AejHI0BwSJ1e58eWYYHa1AhiEteXL1miAMHZ+rBt2VVqI89ARr1F8oSV8qG1XrH63+fEe3 /oluQVaWZT3kyjPZeEbDTp17i+E+Pp8Z487CmCXRlrKHn8N0kYwLPafkLPSw1Wlw8h/60kxrW8X WqQAaDmHJIeteC4KvETon3oEIvhHL3n2wulPAFynie7du8PhpQb/8Gn+aAyjhX3O2xLyO+06b X-Received: by 2002:a05:600c:1388:b0:485:379b:57bb with SMTP id 5b1f17b1804b1-48883569e7fmr49979365e9.3.1775038699297; Wed, 01 Apr 2026 03:18:19 -0700 (PDT) Received: from krava ([2a02:8308:a00c:e200::d99c]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id 5b1f17b1804b1-4887adc52b2sm40302145e9.12.2026.04.01.03.18.18 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Wed, 01 Apr 2026 03:18:18 -0700 (PDT) From: Jiri Olsa X-Google-Original-From: Jiri Olsa Date: Wed, 1 Apr 2026 12:18:16 +0200 To: Hoyeon Lee Cc: bpf@vger.kernel.org, Alexei Starovoitov , Daniel Borkmann , Andrii Nakryiko , Martin KaFai Lau , Eduard Zingerman , Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi , Song Liu , Yonghong Song , Shuah Khan , Feng Yang , linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf-next v6 3/3] selftests/bpf: add test for raw-address single kprobe attach Message-ID: References: <20260401070738.122709-1-hoyeon.lee@suse.com> <20260401070738.122709-4-hoyeon.lee@suse.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20260401070738.122709-4-hoyeon.lee@suse.com> On Wed, Apr 01, 2026 at 04:05:04PM +0900, Hoyeon Lee wrote: > Currently, attach_probe covers manual single-kprobe attaches by > func_name, but not the raw-address form that the PMU-based > single-kprobe path can accept. > > This commit adds PERF and LINK raw-address coverage. It resolves > SYS_NANOSLEEP_KPROBE_NAME through kallsyms, passes the absolute address > in bpf_kprobe_opts.offset with func_name = NULL, and verifies that > kprobe and kretprobe are still triggered. It also verifies that LEGACY > rejects the same form. left 2 nits below Acked-by: Jiri Olsa jirka > > Signed-off-by: Hoyeon Lee > --- > .../selftests/bpf/prog_tests/attach_probe.c | 82 +++++++++++++++++++ > 1 file changed, 82 insertions(+) > > diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/attach_probe.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/attach_probe.c > index 9e77e5da7097..a41542f4b35d 100644 > --- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/attach_probe.c > +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/attach_probe.c > @@ -123,6 +123,82 @@ static void test_attach_probe_manual(enum probe_attach_mode attach_mode) > test_attach_probe_manual__destroy(skel); > } > > +/* manual attach address-based kprobe/kretprobe testings */ > +static void test_attach_kprobe_by_addr(enum probe_attach_mode attach_mode) > +{ > + LIBBPF_OPTS(bpf_kprobe_opts, kprobe_opts); > + struct test_attach_probe_manual *skel; > + unsigned long func_addr; > + > + if (!ASSERT_OK(load_kallsyms(), "load_kallsyms")) > + return; > + > + func_addr = ksym_get_addr(SYS_NANOSLEEP_KPROBE_NAME); > + if (!ASSERT_NEQ(func_addr, 0UL, "func_addr")) > + return; > + > + skel = test_attach_probe_manual__open_and_load(); > + if (!ASSERT_OK_PTR(skel, "skel_kprobe_manual_open_and_load")) > + return; > + > + kprobe_opts.attach_mode = attach_mode; > + kprobe_opts.retprobe = false; > + kprobe_opts.offset = func_addr; > + skel->links.handle_kprobe = > + bpf_program__attach_kprobe_opts(skel->progs.handle_kprobe, > + NULL, &kprobe_opts); > + if (!ASSERT_OK_PTR(skel->links.handle_kprobe, "attach_kprobe_by_addr")) > + goto cleanup; > + > + kprobe_opts.retprobe = true; > + skel->links.handle_kretprobe = > + bpf_program__attach_kprobe_opts(skel->progs.handle_kretprobe, > + NULL, &kprobe_opts); > + if (!ASSERT_OK_PTR(skel->links.handle_kretprobe, > + "attach_kretprobe_by_addr")) nit, no need to split the line > + goto cleanup; > + > + /* trigger & validate kprobe && kretprobe */ > + usleep(1); > + > + ASSERT_EQ(skel->bss->kprobe_res, 1, "check_kprobe_res"); > + ASSERT_EQ(skel->bss->kretprobe_res, 2, "check_kretprobe_res"); > + > +cleanup: > + test_attach_probe_manual__destroy(skel); > +} > + > +/* reject legacy address-based kprobe attach */ > +static void test_attach_kprobe_legacy_by_addr_reject(void) > +{ > + LIBBPF_OPTS(bpf_kprobe_opts, kprobe_opts); > + struct test_attach_probe_manual *skel; > + unsigned long func_addr; > + > + if (!ASSERT_OK(load_kallsyms(), "load_kallsyms")) > + return; > + > + func_addr = ksym_get_addr(SYS_NANOSLEEP_KPROBE_NAME); > + if (!ASSERT_NEQ(func_addr, 0UL, "func_addr")) > + return; > + > + skel = test_attach_probe_manual__open_and_load(); > + if (!ASSERT_OK_PTR(skel, "skel_kprobe_manual_open_and_load")) > + return; > + > + kprobe_opts.attach_mode = PROBE_ATTACH_MODE_LEGACY; > + kprobe_opts.offset = func_addr; > + skel->links.handle_kprobe = > + bpf_program__attach_kprobe_opts(skel->progs.handle_kprobe, > + NULL, &kprobe_opts); > + if (ASSERT_ERR_PTR(skel->links.handle_kprobe, > + "attach_kprobe_legacy_by_addr")) > + ASSERT_EQ(libbpf_get_error(skel->links.handle_kprobe), > + -EOPNOTSUPP, "attach_kprobe_legacy_by_addr_err"); nit, maybe we could do just: ASSERT_ERR_PTR(skel->links.handle_kprobe, "attach_kprobe_legacy_by_addr"); ASSERT_EQ(libbpf_get_error(skel->links.handle_kprobe), -EOPNOTSUPP, "attach_kprobe_legacy_by_addr_err"); > + > + test_attach_probe_manual__destroy(skel); > +} > + > /* attach uprobe/uretprobe long event name testings */ > static void test_attach_uprobe_long_event_name(void) > { > @@ -416,6 +492,12 @@ void test_attach_probe(void) > test_attach_probe_manual(PROBE_ATTACH_MODE_PERF); > if (test__start_subtest("manual-link")) > test_attach_probe_manual(PROBE_ATTACH_MODE_LINK); > + if (test__start_subtest("kprobe-perf-by-addr")) > + test_attach_kprobe_by_addr(PROBE_ATTACH_MODE_PERF); > + if (test__start_subtest("kprobe-link-by-addr")) > + test_attach_kprobe_by_addr(PROBE_ATTACH_MODE_LINK); > + if (test__start_subtest("kprobe-legacy-by-addr-reject")) > + test_attach_kprobe_legacy_by_addr_reject(); > > if (test__start_subtest("auto")) > test_attach_probe_auto(skel); > -- > 2.52.0 >