From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [10.30.226.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A3DE5223323; Tue, 14 Apr 2026 05:51:06 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1776145866; cv=none; b=YRAPBsXd9oNOYS6YqSz5IN9DlPYeDQT2s38AdmL23PbH0r7v7iSowAkuUI5FcKqh4u10nWVID/86tLowUUiyMBxAV6G6G9yM93Z+UKvRQRM7ouV7jSwYMBSztEmA3NPZ/YqAM8hyNsGMXaxdXgb1x1C0S9nmNWV4fhB2ch7lqbI= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1776145866; c=relaxed/simple; bh=NWmyIt82aJGIhkA9bM5kw0zrXESL/v4qMM/khKZiXN8=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=oShfOl1+XqHtHvhANe0F54j24Z/+JDzzlqnosbqWtcaJkbrGPUWvEoSijxSWpGBXaRXqHzwCbGzUBuD+VkA1kOU2RjguSsw3nI+jHBoE/5UaK7jpHK+TwA4pxUMZHYdBvsllcwVZc+N6FRtrktpCZYOzl/6nsGZtaKNa57Dzh+E= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=ZynjR6lS; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="ZynjR6lS" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 988E5C19425; Tue, 14 Apr 2026 05:51:04 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1776145866; bh=NWmyIt82aJGIhkA9bM5kw0zrXESL/v4qMM/khKZiXN8=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=ZynjR6lSaJm6q7dSxF7ZRsbZ72q5bwCKXCZTN6KubqmGa6hW8ZJIFnkGfCvWWPeBK 0icYGKgW/JKRbyU4q6dJABr80t7kqoNjzT2wPgnWmgw3xl2Ng42zeGvLe4L6Zyn4PC cqoKw2gzDw/pHypjNCcUK//uuT0uUgSFi2PqbeqUvHBhGbI4V0WuYOa4Db4Io+2N1j 6DJG6C2kaopiJ6whWsZBk/13/YbO0/cUy9xLS9/5SsqiYjLvtbOCRo0PCEeGg7Xb7m uBl7EgKVS36QIt148Ms161Nn/wTy/rkPWLqTlMVzAKFUkezoQDxDeiQwL8eykOHx2C y1gL//JlOGyYw== Date: Mon, 13 Apr 2026 22:51:02 -0700 From: Namhyung Kim To: Ian Rogers Cc: acme@kernel.org, adrian.hunter@intel.com, ajones@ventanamicro.com, ak@linux.intel.com, alex@ghiti.fr, alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com, anup@brainfault.org, aou@eecs.berkeley.edu, atrajeev@linux.ibm.com, blakejones@google.com, ctshao@google.com, dapeng1.mi@linux.intel.com, derek.foreman@collabora.com, dvyukov@google.com, howardchu95@gmail.com, hrishikesh123s@gmail.com, james.clark@linaro.org, jolsa@kernel.org, krzysztof.m.lopatowski@gmail.com, leo.yan@arm.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org, linux@treblig.org, mingo@redhat.com, nichen@iscas.ac.cn, palmer@dabbelt.com, peterz@infradead.org, pjw@kernel.org, ravi.bangoria@amd.com, swapnil.sapkal@amd.com, tanze@kylinos.cn, thomas.falcon@intel.com, tianyou.li@intel.com, yujie.liu@intel.com, zhouquan@iscas.ac.cn Subject: Re: [PATCH v10 00/29] perf tool: Add evsel to perf_sample Message-ID: References: <20260411191710.524998-1-irogers@google.com> <20260412020833.641177-1-irogers@google.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: On Mon, Apr 13, 2026 at 01:55:39PM -0700, Ian Rogers wrote: > On Mon, Apr 13, 2026 at 1:20 PM Namhyung Kim wrote: > > > > On Mon, Apr 13, 2026 at 09:57:02AM -0700, Ian Rogers wrote: > > > On Mon, Apr 13, 2026 at 9:40 AM Namhyung Kim wrote: > > > > > > > > On Sun, Apr 12, 2026 at 05:52:57PM -0700, Ian Rogers wrote: > > > > > On Sun, Apr 12, 2026 at 1:10 PM Namhyung Kim wrote: > > [SNIP] > > > > > > I've picked the first 23 patches to tmp.perf-tools-next as the rest > > > > > > still has some issues. Also I've touched some commits to either remove > > > > > > some parts or split them into separate commits. > > > > > > > > > > > > Please take a look. > > > > > > > > > > Hi Namhyung, > > > > > > > > > > thanks for doing this but I've done a similar clean up. To totally > > > > > separate the evsel refactoring from the rest of the changes, to fix > > > > > the address sanitizer issues with kwork, etc. I'll incorporate your > > > > > changes and then resend the series. > > > > > > > > Thanks, I'd like to merge what's in the tmp.perf-tools-next unless > > > > there's a serious mistake. You can rebase the rest changes on top. > > > > > > I'd drop what's in tmp.perf-tools-next. Otherwise we're putting fixes > > > on top of fixes. Looking at v12 the sashiko issues are all minor and > > > the progression of the patches is more granular and natural. > > > > The goal is to reduce the amount of work (including review) during the > > merge window. Also I don't think there are many fixes in the tmp > > branch (have you looked at it?). I think it's ok to add fixes on top > > in this case but I can drop non-conversion patches if you want. > > While I'm glad the patches are landing, since the changes depending on > the refactor haven't been posted and won't make the 7.1 merge window, > I don't think there's a huge rush to land this series. That said, I > think v12 is in a good place regarding both the shape of the patches > and Sashiko happiness. Ok, then I'll drop the whole patches in the tmp.perf-tools-next except for the first one for a typo fix. The v12 will aim to the 7.2 cycle. Thanks, Namhyung