From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-alma10-1.taild15c8.ts.net [100.103.45.18]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5DA9531987D; Wed, 8 Jul 2026 19:09:32 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=100.103.45.18 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1783537773; cv=none; b=qpLOc/y9NoZxJjtsscDaMm5NWD2z5nsGN7u+WDVWCwUTIvJ0I2tgM8wHa+8Hod03hYwr6+40drG5fvLqJ3/mylg4lobARJVfaAJB6oCfNvz8OqqEt90tPsWLREtS6UAK8AA8E2NQjc1MskSbZqWSeoUor95PeTQAi3GWxqH+SyE= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1783537773; c=relaxed/simple; bh=8mHKBfBDcO7Nr4zMEMWMTaoYsNCrxh1ztabBZN2GaVg=; h=Date:Message-ID:From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References; b=EZ3vVVKWTru3DxwSynokLKJ67WyZ5Xv1jQFR3XO0A54Omw6h/MOmFDDjlSg0+rCJEjlruOe1GWqD70Z/e5ubfoi0VcmG6Xnj5MjRbGeREyEZPpnue7Qh9r7tBUfN8Omle3UhHHWQzU8Y4WOBhSXWRxDFf+JqTnRmDmARC09QZXM= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=depiG6y5; arc=none smtp.client-ip=100.103.45.18 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="depiG6y5" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id F30151F000E9; Wed, 8 Jul 2026 19:09:31 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=kernel.org; s=k20260515; t=1783537772; bh=/3Vd8+rFeGYq8Gzi01t453CItw8iv1qC290+eHRvKJQ=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References; b=depiG6y5tBCSVc6z0a2ZtA10ymUlcMz9D3xxWLIkqAG9vRcVXWj9B2dZxqjZcrA3u prrOtkN6EL1l2DEJZ3m2V1RsWQVRSJ6uc61ytzSzI8T53XeYanUZ0RijmkjPrBY33t BkR78xeGciLnKT0vL2ALvONGW3oLfDIHr4E+XocZpJF6JwFeSlTThdcmTt0iMrjZkv MP87KIXkRwrYzxeV1Xdsey6s0ppFvco/zqMVJXN3JWdvLzAsgsM7ii4+o/ZcAabRvz aIBcUnG1Nm5kY1xZ1/fNMQtrD/jLYX+ljatfuG5m9KN0gka+8A5bCxEoQJli7JF2cl agWqw+YDIIhmg== Date: Wed, 08 Jul 2026 09:09:31 -1000 Message-ID: From: Tejun Heo To: sashiko-bot@kernel.org Cc: David Vernet , Andrea Righi , Changwoo Min , sched-ext@lists.linux.dev, Emil Tsalapatis , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 sched_ext/for-7.3 10/36] sched_ext: Add ops.init_cids() to finalize the cid layout before init In-Reply-To: <20260707003622.F22591F000E9@smtp.kernel.org> References: <20260707001229.1410929-1-tj@kernel.org> <20260707001229.1410929-11-tj@kernel.org> <20260707003622.F22591F000E9@smtp.kernel.org> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: On Tue, 07 Jul 2026 00:36:22 +0000, sashiko-bot@kernel.org wrote: > - [Medium] Inconsistent ops.init() execution order and silent ignoring of ops.init_cids() for sub-schedulers. init_cids() is root-only by design: the cid layout is global and sub-schedulers inherit it, so a sub has nothing to initialize. The init-order difference has no reader during sub-sched init. No change. Thanks. -- tejun