From: wichert@cistron.nl (Wichert Akkerman)
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] 2.5.18 IDE 73
Date: 30 May 2002 17:39:52 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ad5h48$ako$1@picard.cistron.nl> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <UTC200205300019.g4U0JtH24034.aeb@smtp.cwi.nl> <3CF622F0.4050304@evision-ventures.com> <1022772774.12888.380.camel@irongate.swansea.linux.org.uk> <3CF62F2A.6030009@evision-ventures.com>
In article <3CF62F2A.6030009@evision-ventures.com>,
Martin Dalecki <dalecki@evision-ventures.com> wrote:
>rpm -i util-linux-xxx.src.rpm
>
>and count the patches yourself.
That is just RedHat and not a good indication of code quality at all,
just of how many patches RedHat thinks they should use.
You really should compare with other distributions before even thinking
about making such statements. Debian for example has almost no patches
to util-linux (mostly some changes for crypto support).
Wichert.
--
_________________________________________________________________
/ Nothing is fool-proof to a sufficiently talented fool \
| wichert@wiggy.net http://www.liacs.nl/~wichert/ |
| 1024D/2FA3BC2D 576E 100B 518D 2F16 36B0 2805 3CB8 9250 2FA3 BC2D |
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2002-05-30 15:39 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 41+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2002-05-30 0:19 [PATCH] 2.5.18 IDE 73 Andries.Brouwer
2002-05-30 13:02 ` Martin Dalecki
2002-05-30 15:32 ` Alan Cox
2002-05-30 13:54 ` Martin Dalecki
2002-05-30 15:05 ` Tomas Szepe
2002-05-30 15:13 ` Rene Rebe
2002-05-30 15:39 ` Wichert Akkerman [this message]
2002-05-30 16:13 ` Alan Cox
2002-05-30 14:20 ` Martin Dalecki
2002-05-30 15:31 ` Linus Torvalds
2002-05-30 18:55 ` Martin Dalecki
2002-05-30 15:25 ` Linus Torvalds
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2002-05-30 15:56 Andries.Brouwer
2002-05-30 14:43 Andries.Brouwer
2002-05-30 14:01 ` Martin Dalecki
2002-05-30 15:09 ` Rene Rebe
2002-05-31 13:25 ` Denis Vlasenko
2002-05-30 12:35 Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2002-05-29 23:40 Andries.Brouwer
2002-05-29 22:53 ` Martin Dalecki
2002-05-29 18:16 Andries.Brouwer
2002-05-29 18:07 Andries.Brouwer
2002-05-29 21:57 ` Martin Dalecki
2002-05-29 13:59 Gerald Champagne
2002-05-29 13:03 ` Martin Dalecki
2002-05-29 14:26 ` Gerald Champagne
2002-05-29 14:35 ` Russell King
2002-05-29 13:40 ` Martin Dalecki
2002-05-29 16:33 ` Vojtech Pavlik
2002-05-29 15:46 ` Martin Dalecki
2002-05-29 18:47 ` Alan Cox
2002-05-30 8:48 ` David Woodhouse
2002-05-30 12:22 ` Martin Dalecki
2002-05-29 17:55 ` Alan Cox
2002-05-29 17:01 ` Vojtech Pavlik
2002-05-29 16:05 ` Martin Dalecki
2002-05-29 17:05 ` Vojtech Pavlik
2002-05-29 18:43 ` Alan Cox
2002-05-25 2:02 Linux-2.5.18 Linus Torvalds
2002-05-29 12:11 ` [PATCH] 2.5.18 IDE 73 Martin Dalecki
2002-05-29 12:58 ` Zwane Mwaikambo
2002-05-29 12:52 ` Martin Dalecki
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='ad5h48$ako$1@picard.cistron.nl' \
--to=wichert@cistron.nl \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox