From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Thu, 30 May 2002 11:39:58 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Thu, 30 May 2002 11:39:57 -0400 Received: from ncc1701.cistron.net ([195.64.68.38]:18193 "EHLO ncc1701.cistron.net") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Thu, 30 May 2002 11:39:56 -0400 From: wichert@cistron.nl (Wichert Akkerman) Subject: Re: [PATCH] 2.5.18 IDE 73 Date: 30 May 2002 17:39:52 +0200 Organization: Cistron Group Message-ID: In-Reply-To: <3CF622F0.4050304@evision-ventures.com> <1022772774.12888.380.camel@irongate.swansea.linux.org.uk> <3CF62F2A.6030009@evision-ventures.com> To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org In article <3CF62F2A.6030009@evision-ventures.com>, Martin Dalecki wrote: >rpm -i util-linux-xxx.src.rpm > >and count the patches yourself. That is just RedHat and not a good indication of code quality at all, just of how many patches RedHat thinks they should use. You really should compare with other distributions before even thinking about making such statements. Debian for example has almost no patches to util-linux (mostly some changes for crypto support). Wichert. -- _________________________________________________________________ / Nothing is fool-proof to a sufficiently talented fool \ | wichert@wiggy.net http://www.liacs.nl/~wichert/ | | 1024D/2FA3BC2D 576E 100B 518D 2F16 36B0 2805 3CB8 9250 2FA3 BC2D |