From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@kernel.org>
To: Zhao Qunqin <zhaoqunqin@loongson.cn>
Cc: arnd@arndb.de, olof@lixom.net, soc@kernel.org,
soc@lists.linux.dev, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
loongarch@lists.linux.dev, xry111@xry111.site,
christophe.jaillet@wanadoo.fr
Subject: Re: [PATCH V2 RESEND] soc: loongson: add Loongson Security Module driver
Date: Fri, 3 Jan 2025 09:46:04 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ad947db9-119b-4931-ab13-31ea25a66db9@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <ad63f9ab-90cb-abe7-8099-2666e9a65a56@loongson.cn>
On 03/01/2025 09:35, Zhao Qunqin wrote:
>
> 在 2025/1/3 下午3:26, Krzysztof Kozlowski 写道:
>> On 03/01/2025 03:25, Zhao Qunqin wrote:
>>> 在 2024/12/28 下午7:02, Krzysztof Kozlowski 写道:
>>>>> Only ACPI firmware is supported.
>>>>>
>>>>> Signed-off-by: Qunqin Zhao <zhaoqunqin@loongson.cn>
>>>> I don't get why you are sending this to soc. This is loongson specific
>>>> and is supposed to go via Loongson maintainers.
>>>>
>>>> And why is this a resend?
>>> There are no platform-specific maintainers, So I initially sent the
>>> patch to Arnd,
>> What do you mean by "no platform-specific maintainers"? This
>> architecture and this platform is abandoned?
>
> Sorry for my poor english. This architecture and this platform is not
> ababdoned.
>
> What I mean is that there are no Loongson staff to maintain
> drivers/soc/loongson.
But there are maintainers of the platform, are they? Someone cares about
Loongson or not?
If someone cares, then Cc this person and this person is responsible for
handling your patches. This is called "maintainer".
If no one cares, then platform is abandoned and we should consider
calling it orphaned in Linux.
>
> The current maintainer for drivers/soc/loongson is Arnd.
I don't think so. First, it is unusual. Second, maintainers disagree
with you on above statement.
You keep disagreeing here with me and I am afraid we will end up in
endless discussion, so to reiterate because maybe I wrote my emails too
soft or too conditional, instead of stating the desired outcome:
Please send your Loongson SoC drivers to Loongson maintainers and they
are supposed to take it. If they do not take it, I will send patch for
making the platform orphaned.
Best regards,
Krzysztof
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-01-03 8:46 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-12-24 7:25 [PATCH V2 RESEND] soc: loongson: add Loongson Security Module driver Qunqin Zhao
2024-12-28 11:02 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2025-01-03 2:25 ` Zhao Qunqin
2025-01-03 7:26 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2025-01-03 8:35 ` Zhao Qunqin
2025-01-03 8:46 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski [this message]
2025-01-03 8:47 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=ad947db9-119b-4931-ab13-31ea25a66db9@kernel.org \
--to=krzk@kernel.org \
--cc=arnd@arndb.de \
--cc=christophe.jaillet@wanadoo.fr \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=loongarch@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=olof@lixom.net \
--cc=soc@kernel.org \
--cc=soc@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=xry111@xry111.site \
--cc=zhaoqunqin@loongson.cn \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox