From: Florian Fuchs <fuchsfl@gmail.com>
To: Adrian McMenamin <adrianmcmenamin@gmail.com>
Cc: linux-sh@vger.kernel.org,
John Paul Adrian Glaubitz <glaubitz@physik.fu-berlin.de>,
Artur Rojek <contact@artur-rojek.eu>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] cdrom: gdrom: update gendisk capacity on open
Date: Mon, 6 Apr 2026 11:20:51 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <adN68wCJd6QEZyNW@lithos> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CACwZE5Rmy3A0k3tvc32gv0V3T1LL2PaP_+S7N87mwNppLTh=PA@mail.gmail.com>
On 05 Apr 14:24, Adrian McMenamin wrote:
> On Sun, 5 Apr 2026 at 09:23, Florian Fuchs <fuchsfl@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > Update the gendisk capacity of the media. Without the capacity, the block
> > reads fail before reaching the request queue, which prevented ISO9660
> > mounts. Refresh the capacity from the TOC leadout in gdrom_bdops_open()
> > so it checks the inserted media.
> >
> ...
> > +
> > static int gdrom_bdops_open(struct gendisk *disk, blk_mode_t mode)
> > {
> > int ret;
> > @@ -492,6 +511,8 @@ static int gdrom_bdops_open(struct gendisk *disk, blk_mode_t mode)
> >
> > mutex_lock(&gdrom_mutex);
> > ret = cdrom_open(gd.cd_info, mode);
> > + if (!ret)
> > + ret = gdrom_update_capacity();
> > mutex_unlock(&gdrom_mutex);
> > return ret;
> > }
>
>
> Will this not reintrocue the potential race condition bug that was
> eliminated here -
> https://github.com/mcmenaminadrian/linux/commit/2bbea6e117357d17842114c65e9a9cf2d13ae8a3
> (not by me, I add)?
You mean, because one of the functions in the call tree of
gdrom_update_capacity() wants to get the mutex gdrom_mutex or s_umount?
I checked the locally called functions, but don't see that one tries to
aquire a lock.
I don't understand the exact potential of the race condition, maybe you
can elaborate, where I should look.
Thank You!
Regards
Florian
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-04-06 9:20 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-04-05 8:23 [PATCH 0/2] cdrom: gdrom: fix block I/O and capacity setting Florian Fuchs
2026-04-05 8:23 ` [PATCH 1/2] cdrom: gdrom: replace port I/O with MMIO accessors Florian Fuchs
2026-04-05 13:16 ` Adrian McMenamin
2026-04-06 9:05 ` Florian Fuchs
2026-04-05 8:23 ` [PATCH 2/2] cdrom: gdrom: update gendisk capacity on open Florian Fuchs
2026-04-05 13:24 ` Adrian McMenamin
2026-04-06 9:20 ` Florian Fuchs [this message]
2026-04-06 10:00 ` Adrian McMenamin
2026-04-06 10:21 ` Adrian McMenamin
2026-04-06 15:12 ` Florian Fuchs
2026-04-05 14:09 ` [PATCH 0/2] cdrom: gdrom: fix block I/O and capacity setting John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
2026-04-06 0:58 ` Florian Fuchs
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=adN68wCJd6QEZyNW@lithos \
--to=fuchsfl@gmail.com \
--cc=adrianmcmenamin@gmail.com \
--cc=contact@artur-rojek.eu \
--cc=glaubitz@physik.fu-berlin.de \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-sh@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox