From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com (us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com [170.10.133.124]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CE5FE391854 for ; Tue, 7 Apr 2026 08:45:44 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=170.10.133.124 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1775551546; cv=none; b=AjTT0h3R24VRhmRAwawBHg5OCM4DmuYb+6TWRTX1Vkq1/xGpe6mDRnEauqYlVkxHG4lusC6saL21GCJATMEU4hzfEtRjIEYdYUEm0rNC1GmrYfffF3/RH6uO0JXvBLxdtOT8XRlANA606Kb32CN2R95wEmpEdZ8DR1jp1Sjen1k= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1775551546; c=relaxed/simple; bh=z7XMqNzqbaQp3YVbNCSinxYvK5mXLBbHoHlDC+DisRo=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=D7Q0qWkWiLjX21irMz946OLt0/UyMVk/I8YAkuGg4fdhEFL+Y+I2MEHbSSOLEm32PPHmTnC4ucrk+sB4B2XHJzYUfILx93+nb0agG1QT4s6VTctnKEw+2T7kKLBkdfLPbpOhFuByYPdoya+Q2LPGAsN31ZlrQakhJxJicvbYmUU= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=quarantine dis=none) header.from=redhat.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=redhat.com; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=redhat.com header.i=@redhat.com header.b=NkqxTo+i; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=redhat.com header.i=@redhat.com header.b=QuUh8Fwv; arc=none smtp.client-ip=170.10.133.124 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=quarantine dis=none) header.from=redhat.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=redhat.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=redhat.com header.i=@redhat.com header.b="NkqxTo+i"; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=redhat.com header.i=@redhat.com header.b="QuUh8Fwv" DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1775551544; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=90Dv0Gfd1H3V0FF0ZZTa8jkFYwFCJbiDQpupdqGKTx4=; b=NkqxTo+iRgJTl+3PH6z3BvE2jnc96lV5QqQG2F7C2+ozTTlWnTiDAvfdP1nd02Jj+OrhGS IXSTrzay+1MbfVwHXhh1yDRte4oKsK/ogvwJn6zvPDQbGAC0DGJLyppJ5ip9+tlgGCBrIT foo5JIoHOaMCuWS+L31PddUQ+bfLee0= Received: from mail-wm1-f72.google.com (mail-wm1-f72.google.com [209.85.128.72]) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP with STARTTLS (version=TLSv1.3, cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id us-mta-540-nEfCTazIOR-WBhZnYyjLIw-1; Tue, 07 Apr 2026 04:45:42 -0400 X-MC-Unique: nEfCTazIOR-WBhZnYyjLIw-1 X-Mimecast-MFC-AGG-ID: nEfCTazIOR-WBhZnYyjLIw_1775551542 Received: by mail-wm1-f72.google.com with SMTP id 5b1f17b1804b1-48887ff8b73so26688895e9.2 for ; Tue, 07 Apr 2026 01:45:42 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=google; t=1775551541; x=1776156341; darn=vger.kernel.org; h=in-reply-to:content-disposition:mime-version:references:message-id :subject:cc:to:from:date:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=90Dv0Gfd1H3V0FF0ZZTa8jkFYwFCJbiDQpupdqGKTx4=; b=QuUh8Fwv5bfnd+aAjW7iR5w2eJktf60pi+AhtvXEQRhaUk7DyiMj+1ORH4KMoYL7eW vF/OG0nWF8RjfNsSBOTReiHwai79fos2stpwhXVmzrYsU6RrXz6jTkRVcwcRwhBXRdyg Ob+6WeHHKvRtln/JhrxEHcw6sYho9c8cFWqPmDozQVu8Cat6/Fg3m9bjexeeSWW4WE7K USaKERp2a7AAtIplsgUpgiERxNfGA1qfVrXI8I903P6vDuln2dGPX8Dm49ov2ZPWSyK5 unqzwTjzuOfjtdv0Xn+4RR9wR1ilIu/N/23TUeM4W3D426JZ+rGJJBVRCAG2MAyq1mw3 50Uw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20251104; t=1775551541; x=1776156341; h=in-reply-to:content-disposition:mime-version:references:message-id :subject:cc:to:from:date:x-gm-gg:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc :subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=90Dv0Gfd1H3V0FF0ZZTa8jkFYwFCJbiDQpupdqGKTx4=; b=kI4M6HB8eUjDK+rW0hFyUAu5BAfnKj7Jg6y8JbiP+P+IiaXFpuWAM7qGx+39o6jt5B 4WpYUjyuJaIZD2mqvdFExrYg2rqyhr865naHiVD0rPMphYVo+mq2NNqJkONYd0OPhPzr Gkq0AiJAkZWt0XR6hFDAAs2oW9MK/8MqeWfCQo0gPkvZ1p17NTtYcag3HdJRpQtcbrnG LSnt+3F0iKFZ+4Dy1ltcLmdITjPI+YJ34Q8Gg6zXTj0dqrycmdkCqqfF/GLO8Twc4Qzl q/TmoI/vSqmLaRE6TJ/p1MGLG6qSnBQM9BE3bK6g8l/UcXgIO+MvBEYkG9Opo9gVsEgO xykw== X-Forwarded-Encrypted: i=1; AJvYcCVEqeSe457FrC4BxEtzzZ3BJFw0X/amMYOAHnzBiLG7moPf0xsf8H+uevnW7J2kZyIBtOKVRaQeXb2/fss=@vger.kernel.org X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0YzusDvj7LdNo9HULEIbZgUZQ4GINFS/Fg/CPLQWLRPAG10KBT12 4Mk50e/suA8rYqJEF7nEDaD1hBt8ga76TDX9ckD/m+GKA0Da6FL5Hhg3KVmqEviSKuzOpssKyen DIFlY7ag/aoO4uu4rwqBacphbvOTQKcPM0foGIMewfMEsQ+qfGdcMtERYTQiVSRgoZw== X-Gm-Gg: AeBDiete2Bdu5aqOaMT/wtgjkuUK+12FlLgbWmN+pBsKJg3CbKe3Q6GmhjTCMUJwh2U NRKM5vSSt76A6zGCeYoL9bj+UbVwSIQWOG/m5nCrH+a0IKO74rL1QmUxwkzLVd/jmIl1+DLJgk6 6dG8m/RaOdCSjKh8XVemeaXfUpeyWuUOht483VKm8jT0fSgXqDf3OcaNF8EjmtjafSie9ca5L6n FSPeVRpqJSQKfxTfq3b/WTXo3NO306fouKT4FJQKu7qjZciZ2KtzZFnQWekbtBiBD4SHp8R2LdP cqAwb5ZJTffg8SfLDhk4zFMmuA8QlQSkFzvmlRmRFrNQ2czgoWTay8jYMqCDVKzu51o9ny5/vwu oUil6zVO7boBcrN/4tPmNIMjWhqs= X-Received: by 2002:a05:600c:4f15:b0:488:945a:ed63 with SMTP id 5b1f17b1804b1-488995cbaa7mr243063755e9.0.1775551541494; Tue, 07 Apr 2026 01:45:41 -0700 (PDT) X-Received: by 2002:a05:600c:4f15:b0:488:945a:ed63 with SMTP id 5b1f17b1804b1-488995cbaa7mr243063245e9.0.1775551541043; Tue, 07 Apr 2026 01:45:41 -0700 (PDT) Received: from leonardi-redhat ([176.206.19.176]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id 5b1f17b1804b1-4888a7165aasm527048625e9.14.2026.04.07.01.45.39 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Tue, 07 Apr 2026 01:45:40 -0700 (PDT) Date: Tue, 7 Apr 2026 10:45:37 +0200 From: Luigi Leonardi To: Arseniy Krasnov Cc: Stefan Hajnoczi , Stefano Garzarella , "Michael S. Tsirkin" , Jason Wang , Xuan Zhuo , Eugenio =?utf-8?B?UMOpcmV6?= , "David S. Miller" , Eric Dumazet , Jakub Kicinski , Paolo Abeni , Simon Horman , kvm@vger.kernel.org, virtualization@lists.linux.dev, netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH net 2/2] vsock/test: add MSG_PEEK after partial recv test Message-ID: References: <20260402-fix_peek-v1-0-ad274fcef77b@redhat.com> <20260402-fix_peek-v1-2-ad274fcef77b@redhat.com> <2521971f-798d-4560-b2d8-bb540591d4b1@salutedevices.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <2521971f-798d-4560-b2d8-bb540591d4b1@salutedevices.com> Hi Arseniy, On Sun, Apr 05, 2026 at 10:14:26PM +0300, Arseniy Krasnov wrote: > > >02.04.2026 11:18, Luigi Leonardi wrote: >> Add a test that verifies MSG_PEEK works correctly after a partial >> recv(). >> >> This is to test a bug that was present in the `virtio_transport_stream_do_peek()` >> when computing the number of bytes to copy: After a partial read, the >> peek function didn't take into consideration the number of bytes that >> were already read. So peeking the whole buffer would cause a out-of-bounds read, >> that resulted in a -EFAULT. >> >> This test does exactly this: do a partial recv on a buffer, then try to >> peek the whole buffer content. >> >> Signed-off-by: Luigi Leonardi >> --- >> tools/testing/vsock/vsock_test.c | 64 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ >> 1 file changed, 64 insertions(+) >> >> diff --git a/tools/testing/vsock/vsock_test.c b/tools/testing/vsock/vsock_test.c >> index 5bd20ccd9335caafe68e8b7a5d02a4deb3d2deec..308f9f8f30d22bec5aaa282356e400d8438fe321 100644 >> --- a/tools/testing/vsock/vsock_test.c >> +++ b/tools/testing/vsock/vsock_test.c >> @@ -346,6 +346,65 @@ static void test_stream_msg_peek_server(const struct test_opts *opts) >> return test_msg_peek_server(opts, false); >> } >> >> +#define PEEK_AFTER_RECV_LEN 100 > >Hi, may be we can just reuse MSG_PEEK_BUF_LEN which was already used in MSG_PEEK tests ? > yep, good idea! Thanks!