From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754585AbXFTU7h (ORCPT ); Wed, 20 Jun 2007 16:59:37 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1752455AbXFTU7a (ORCPT ); Wed, 20 Jun 2007 16:59:30 -0400 Received: from sj-iport-4.cisco.com ([171.68.10.86]:42864 "EHLO sj-iport-4.cisco.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752423AbXFTU73 (ORCPT ); Wed, 20 Jun 2007 16:59:29 -0400 X-IronPort-AV: i="4.16,444,1175497200"; d="scan'208"; a="5281087:sNHT18890286" To: Andy Whitcroft Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: scripts/checkpatch.pl refers to non-existent Documentation/Documentation/volatile-considered-harmful.txt X-Message-Flag: Warning: May contain useful information From: Roland Dreier Date: Wed, 20 Jun 2007 13:59:15 -0700 Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.1007 (Gnus v5.10.7) XEmacs/21.4.19 (linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-OriginalArrivalTime: 20 Jun 2007 20:59:15.0497 (UTC) FILETIME=[DC7F6990:01C7B37D] Authentication-Results: sj-dkim-2; header.From=rdreier@cisco.com; dkim=pass ( sig from cisco.com/sjdkim2002 verified; ); Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Commit 4a0df2ef added the following to scripts/checkpatch.pl: print "Use of volatile is usually wrong: see Documentation/volatile-considered-harmful.txt\n"; but Linus's tree has no such file. not sure what the right thing to do here is, since I assume we do ultimately want something of the sort in Documentation... - R.