From: Roland Dreier <rdreier@cisco.com>
To: Avi Kivity <avi@qumranet.com>
Cc: Dave Hansen <dave@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
"linux-kernel\@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
kvm-devel <kvm@vger.kernel.org>,
"Anthony N. Liguori \[imap\]" <aliguori@us.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: KVM overflows the stack
Date: Wed, 16 Jul 2008 23:08:01 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ada4p6p9h6m.fsf@cisco.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <487EDE26.8040201@qumranet.com> (Avi Kivity's message of "Thu, 17 Jul 2008 08:52:38 +0300")
> Yes, things like kvm_lapic_state are way too big to be on the stack.
I had a quick look at the code, and my worry about dynamic allocation
would be that handling allocation failure seems like it might get
tricky. Eg for handling struct kvm_pv_mmu_op_buffer (which is 528 bytes
on the stack in kvm_pv_mmu_op()) can you deal with an mmu op failing?
(maybe in that case you can easily by just setting *ret to 0?)
> There's an additional problem here, that apparently your gcc (which
> version?) doesn't fold objects in a switch statement into the same
> stack slot:
>
> switch (...) {
> case x: {
> struct medium a;
> ...
> }
> case y:
> struct medium b;
> ...
> }
> };
A trick for this is to do:
union {
struct medium1 a;
struct medium2 b;
} u;
switch (...) {
case x:
use u.a;
...
case y:
use u.b;
...
}
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-07-17 6:08 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 32+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-03-25 21:12 kvm causing memory corruption? ~2.6.25-rc6 Dave Hansen
2008-03-26 9:50 ` [kvm-devel] " Avi Kivity
2008-03-26 16:52 ` Dave Hansen
2008-03-26 16:58 ` Avi Kivity
2008-03-26 17:16 ` Dave Hansen
2008-03-27 9:36 ` Avi Kivity
2008-03-27 10:10 ` Avi Kivity
2008-03-27 14:55 ` Dave Hansen
2008-03-27 14:59 ` Avi Kivity
2008-03-27 16:30 ` Dave Hansen
2008-06-02 22:30 ` kvm causing memory corruption? now 2.6.26-rc4 Dave Hansen
2008-06-03 0:59 ` Dave Hansen
2008-06-04 13:42 ` Avi Kivity
2008-06-06 7:41 ` Dave Hansen
2008-06-12 13:10 ` Avi Kivity
2008-06-16 18:07 ` Dave Hansen
2008-07-15 18:57 ` kvm causing memory corruption? now 2.6.26-rc8 Dave Hansen
2008-07-16 21:44 ` kvm causing memory corruption? now 2.6.26 Dave Hansen
2008-07-16 22:48 ` KVM overflows the stack Dave Hansen
2008-07-17 5:52 ` Avi Kivity
2008-07-17 6:08 ` Roland Dreier [this message]
2008-07-17 14:06 ` Dave Hansen
2008-07-17 14:15 ` Avi Kivity
2008-07-17 6:14 ` Dave Hansen
2008-07-17 6:42 ` Avi Kivity
2008-07-17 6:45 ` [PATCH] update kvm's anon_inodes.c for r/o bind mounts Dave Hansen
2008-07-19 7:33 ` Avi Kivity
2008-07-17 6:27 ` KVM overflows the stack Dave Hansen
2008-07-17 5:38 ` kvm causing memory corruption? now 2.6.26 Avi Kivity
2008-03-27 15:50 ` [kvm-devel] kvm causing memory corruption? ~2.6.25-rc6 Dave Hansen
2008-03-27 15:53 ` Avi Kivity
2008-03-27 16:30 ` Dave Hansen
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=ada4p6p9h6m.fsf@cisco.com \
--to=rdreier@cisco.com \
--cc=aliguori@us.ibm.com \
--cc=avi@qumranet.com \
--cc=dave@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox