public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Roland Dreier <rdreier@cisco.com>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Bart Van Assche <bart.vanassche@gmail.com>,
	David Dillow <dave@thedillows.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] log2.h: Macro-ize is_power_of_2() for use in BUILD_BUG_ON
Date: Wed, 06 Jan 2010 13:23:13 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <ada8wcbszb2.fsf@roland-alpha.cisco.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20100106123306.ac85e557.akpm@linux-foundation.org> (Andrew Morton's message of "Wed, 6 Jan 2010 12:33:06 -0800")


 > We've had recurring struggles with various versions of gcc screwing up
 > constructs of this form and trying to emit the non-constant code when
 > the arg was clearly a compile-time constant.  One episode which comes
 > to mind was when we made changes to kmalloc().
 > 
 > Of course, that might not bite us in this case - it would need a lot of
 > coverage testing to find out.

Actually, after thinking about this a bit more I don't think this is
much of a risk in this case.  The bad case is where gcc gets the wrong
answer for __builtin_constant_p(), and in that case, we're left with the
status quo ante, ie a call to the original inline function implementation.

This will break a call to BUILD_BUG_ON() but that's visible at compile
time.  It's hard to think of a silent failure case that actually hurts
anything -- the macro and inline implementation are identical, except
that the macro implementation will work when gcc really needs a compile
time constant.

 - R.

      parent reply	other threads:[~2010-01-06 21:23 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2010-01-06 20:21 [PATCH] log2.h: Macro-ize is_power_of_2() for use in BUILD_BUG_ON Roland Dreier
2010-01-06 20:33 ` Andrew Morton
2010-01-06 20:44   ` Roland Dreier
2010-01-06 21:15     ` David Dillow
2010-01-06 21:42     ` Andrew Morton
2010-01-06 23:02       ` [PATCH] Add BUILD_BUG_ON_NOT_POWER_OF_2() Roland Dreier
2010-01-06 23:09         ` Andrew Morton
2010-01-07  7:33         ` Bart Van Assche
2010-01-07  7:51           ` Roland Dreier
2010-01-07  8:36         ` Robert P. J. Day
2010-01-07 16:45           ` Stefan Richter
2010-01-06 21:23   ` Roland Dreier [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=ada8wcbszb2.fsf@roland-alpha.cisco.com \
    --to=rdreier@cisco.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=bart.vanassche@gmail.com \
    --cc=dave@thedillows.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox