public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Roland Dreier <rdreier@cisco.com>
To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
Cc: Pierre Ossman <drzeus-list@drzeus.cx>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Git training wheels for the pimple faced maintainer
Date: Sat, 21 Oct 2006 09:47:15 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <adabqo5lip8.fsf@cisco.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0610191629250.3962@g5.osdl.org> (Linus Torvalds's message of "Thu, 19 Oct 2006 16:44:41 -0700 (PDT)")

 > Other git maintainers may have other hints about how they work. Anybody?

I use StGIT (http://www.procode.org/stgit/) to have sort of a hybrid
git/quilt workflow.  My infiniband.git tree has the following main
branches (I also keep other topic branches around):

  for-2.6.19
  for-2.6.20
  for-linus
  for-mm
  master

I use master to track Linus's tree.  for-2.6.19 and for-2.6.20 are
StGIT branches that have patches queued up for 2.6.19 and 2.6.20
(duh).  The advantages of StGIT are:

  - I can do "stg pull" to do the equivalent of "git rebase" in a
    slightly cleaner way.
  - If I queue a patch and then someone later says "oops, that patch
    needs this fix," I can go back and revise the patch easily.  This
    means I avoid cluttering the main kernel history with "change X"
    followed by "fix for change X" followed by "update change X"
  - StGIT works within git, so when it is time to send the changes to
    Linus, I can just do "git merge blah for-linus for-2.6.19" and
    then ask Linus to pull the for-linus branch.

 - R.

  parent reply	other threads:[~2006-10-21 16:47 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2006-10-19 21:17 Git training wheels for the pimple faced maintainer Pierre Ossman
2006-10-19 22:25 ` Andrew Morton
2006-10-20  6:26   ` Pierre Ossman
2006-10-20  6:35     ` Kyle Moffett
2006-10-20  6:37     ` Andrew Morton
2006-10-25 21:50       ` Pierre Ossman
2006-10-25 22:06         ` Andrew Morton
2006-10-19 23:44 ` Linus Torvalds
2006-10-20  1:07   ` Mark Fasheh
2006-10-20  6:45     ` Pierre Ossman
2006-10-20 21:08       ` Mark Fasheh
2006-10-20  4:28   ` Kyle Moffett
2006-10-20  6:34   ` Pierre Ossman
2006-10-20  7:30     ` Kyle Moffett
2006-10-20 15:26     ` Linus Torvalds
2006-10-20 15:35       ` Linus Torvalds
2006-10-21  9:44       ` Pierre Ossman
2006-10-21 16:10         ` Linus Torvalds
2006-10-21 18:05           ` Pierre Ossman
2006-10-21 19:07             ` Linus Torvalds
2006-10-21 16:47   ` Roland Dreier [this message]
2006-10-21 18:15     ` Pierre Ossman
2006-10-21 21:27       ` Roland Dreier

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=adabqo5lip8.fsf@cisco.com \
    --to=rdreier@cisco.com \
    --cc=akpm@osdl.org \
    --cc=drzeus-list@drzeus.cx \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=torvalds@osdl.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox