public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Roland Dreier <rdreier@cisco.com>
To: Adam Baker <linux@baker-net.org.uk>
Cc: rt2400-devel@lists.sourceforge.net,
	Ivo van Doorn <ivdoorn@gmail.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kernel-stuff@comcast.net
Subject: Re: [Rt2400-devel] [PATCH] rt2500usb - Don't claim 050d:705{0/a}
Date: Fri, 26 Oct 2007 13:05:54 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <adaejfhzlnh.fsf@cisco.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200710262058.56188.linux@baker-net.org.uk> (Adam Baker's message of "Fri, 26 Oct 2007 20:58:56 +0100")

 > The function that is returning ENODEV is the driver probe function. According 
 > to Documentation/DocBook/writing_usb_driver/ch03.html when that function is 
 > called 
 > 
 > "The driver now needs to verify that this device is actually one that it can 
 > accept. If so, it returns 0. If not, or if any error occurs during 
 > initialization, an errorcode (such as -ENOMEM or -ENODEV) is returned from 
 > the probe function."
 > 
 > It isn't a device the driver can accept so it returns -ENODEV

That's all true but irrelevant.  That error return isn't propagated
back to userspace when it runs modprobe (and in fact it *can't* be
sanely returned to userspace -- what do you do if the probe function
succeeds for two devices and fails for a third?).  So there's not
really any way for userspace to loop through a list of modules until
one succeeds.

  reply	other threads:[~2007-10-26 20:06 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2007-10-24 23:22 [PATCH] rt2500usb - Don't claim 050d:705{0/a} Parag Warudkar
2007-10-25 19:35 ` [Rt2400-devel] " Adam Baker
2007-10-25 22:33   ` Parag Warudkar
2007-10-25 21:15 ` Ivo van Doorn
2007-10-25 22:41   ` Parag Warudkar
2007-10-26 18:39     ` Ivo van Doorn
2007-10-26 19:10       ` Roland Dreier
2007-10-26 19:58         ` Adam Baker
2007-10-26 20:05           ` Roland Dreier [this message]
2007-10-26 21:34             ` Ivo van Doorn

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=adaejfhzlnh.fsf@cisco.com \
    --to=rdreier@cisco.com \
    --cc=ivdoorn@gmail.com \
    --cc=kernel-stuff@comcast.net \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux@baker-net.org.uk \
    --cc=rt2400-devel@lists.sourceforge.net \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox