From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S934510AbWKXXHX (ORCPT ); Fri, 24 Nov 2006 18:07:23 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S932502AbWKXXHX (ORCPT ); Fri, 24 Nov 2006 18:07:23 -0500 Received: from sj-iport-4.cisco.com ([171.68.10.86]:56744 "EHLO sj-iport-4.cisco.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S934510AbWKXXHW (ORCPT ); Fri, 24 Nov 2006 18:07:22 -0500 To: Hoang-Nam Nguyen Cc: Christoph Raisch , Hoang-Nam Nguyen , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org, linuxppc-dev-bounces+hnguyen=de.ibm.com@ozlabs.org, openib-general@openib.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 2.6.19] ehca: bug fix: use wqe offset instead wqe address to determine pending work requests X-Message-Flag: Warning: May contain useful information References: From: Roland Dreier Date: Fri, 24 Nov 2006 15:07:20 -0800 Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.1007 (Gnus v5.10.7) XEmacs/21.4.19 (linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-OriginalArrivalTime: 24 Nov 2006 23:07:20.0727 (UTC) FILETIME=[4B547270:01C7101D] Authentication-Results: sj-dkim-4; header.From=rdreier@cisco.com; dkim=pass ( sig from cisco.com/sjdkim4002 verified; ); Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org > That's fair. I understand your decision. And thanks for queueing for > 2.6.20. Can you please brief me on patch procedures for post-2.6.19? What do you mean by post-2.6.19? Things go into 2.6.19.x via stable@kernel.org, if that's what you're asking. Documentation/stable_kernel_rules.txt describes what patches are appropriate for 2.6.19.x, and given that we're so close to the 2.6.19 final release, I'm working under similar rules for what I'm going to merge into 2.6.19.