From: Roland Dreier <rdreier@cisco.com>
To: tziporet@dev.mellanox.co.il
Cc: general@lists.openfabrics.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [ofa-general] InfiniBand/iWARP/RDMA merge plans for 2.6.26 (what's in infiniband.git)
Date: Wed, 02 Apr 2008 09:19:17 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <adahcek2pru.fsf@cisco.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <47F37CA4.8000109@mellanox.co.il> (Tziporet Koren's message of "Wed, 02 Apr 2008 15:31:32 +0300")
> We want to add send with invalidate & mask compare and swap.
> Eli will be able to send the patches next week and since they are
> small I think they can be in for 2.6.26
Send with invalidate should be OK. Let's see about the masked atomics
stuff -- we have a ton of new verbs and I think we might want to slow
down and make sure it all makes sense.
> What about the split CQ for UD mode? It's improved the IPoIB
> performance for small messages significantly.
Oh yeah... I'll try to get that in too.
> mlx4- we plan to send patches for the low level driver only to enable
> mlx4_en. These only affect our low level driver.
No problem in principle, let's see the actual patches.
> I think we should try to push for XEC in 2.6.26 since there are
> already MPI implementation that use it and this ties them to use OFED
> only.
> Also this feature is stable and now being defined in IBTA
> Not taking it causing changes between OFED and the kernel and your
> libibverbs and we wish to avoid such gaps.
> Is there any thing we can do to help and make it into 2.6.26?
I don't have a good feeling that the user-kernel interface is well
thought out, so I want to consider XRC + ehca LL stuff + new iWARP verbs
and make sure we have something that makes sense for the future.
- R.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-04-02 16:19 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-04-01 20:02 InfiniBand/iWARP/RDMA merge plans for 2.6.26 (what's in infiniband.git) Roland Dreier
2008-04-01 16:55 ` [ofa-general] " Shirley Ma
2008-04-02 7:22 ` Shirley Ma
2008-04-02 15:27 ` Roland Dreier
2008-04-02 17:11 ` Richard Frank
2008-04-02 16:15 ` Roland Dreier
2008-04-02 17:18 ` Richard Frank
2008-04-02 16:26 ` Roland Dreier
2008-04-02 17:28 ` Richard Frank
2008-04-02 17:24 ` Richard Frank
2008-04-02 16:29 ` [ofa-general] InfiniBand/iWARP/RDMA merge plans for 2.6.26 (what'sin infiniband.git) Scott Weitzenkamp (sweitzen)
2008-04-02 17:37 ` Richard Frank
2008-04-02 16:46 ` Scott Weitzenkamp (sweitzen)
2008-04-02 18:00 ` Richard Frank
2008-04-02 17:04 ` Scott Weitzenkamp (sweitzen)
2008-04-02 12:31 ` [ofa-general] InfiniBand/iWARP/RDMA merge plans for 2.6.26 (what's in infiniband.git) Tziporet Koren
2008-04-02 16:19 ` Roland Dreier [this message]
2008-04-03 11:40 ` Tziporet Koren
2008-04-04 20:26 ` Richard Frank
2008-04-04 19:34 ` Roland Dreier
2008-04-04 22:21 ` Richard Frank
2008-04-04 5:54 ` Or Gerlitz
[not found] <OF1D776305.7E25BAA6-ON8725741F.005B027C-8825741F.002F5161@us.ibm.com>
2008-04-02 16:37 ` Roland Dreier
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=adahcek2pru.fsf@cisco.com \
--to=rdreier@cisco.com \
--cc=general@lists.openfabrics.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=tziporet@dev.mellanox.co.il \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).