public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* Usage semantics of atomic_set ( )
@ 2008-01-11 22:57 Vineet Gupta
  2008-01-11 23:16 ` Roland Dreier
  2008-01-12  1:37 ` Chris Snook
  0 siblings, 2 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Vineet Gupta @ 2008-01-11 22:57 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: linux-kernel

I'm trying to implement atomic ops for a CPU which has no inherent
support for Read-Modify-Write Ops. Instead of using a global spin lock
which protects all the atomic APIs, I want to use a spin lock per
instance of atomic_t. This works well when atomic_t is unitary and
statically initialized using ATOMIC_INIT (where I can reset the
spinlock_t as well). However if atomic_t var is embedded within a
bigger struct which is allocated dynamically how to I init the
embedded spin lock. atomic_set ( ) is the closest choice, however I
don't think it's current usage in kernel code qualifies it to be
"initializer only".

Doesn't that defeat the intended usage of atomic_t as a opaque type
which can be "effectively" used to hide other architecture specific
stuff.

Thanks,
Vineet

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2008-01-12 18:37 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2008-01-11 22:57 Usage semantics of atomic_set ( ) Vineet Gupta
2008-01-11 23:16 ` Roland Dreier
2008-01-12  1:37 ` Chris Snook
2008-01-12 18:36   ` Vineet Gupta

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox