From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1755228AbZHUJKG (ORCPT ); Fri, 21 Aug 2009 05:10:06 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1755160AbZHUJKF (ORCPT ); Fri, 21 Aug 2009 05:10:05 -0400 Received: from sj-iport-5.cisco.com ([171.68.10.87]:59579 "EHLO sj-iport-5.cisco.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1755035AbZHUJKE (ORCPT ); Fri, 21 Aug 2009 05:10:04 -0400 X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: ApoEAEcBjkqrR7PD/2dsb2JhbAC9aIgvkQUFhBiENg X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.44,249,1249257600"; d="scan'208";a="90911613" From: Roland Dreier To: "Woodruff\, Robert J" Cc: "linux-kernel\@vger.kernel.org" , "general\@lists.openfabrics.org" Subject: Re: [ofa-general] Opinions on moving Linux InfiniBand/RDMA mailing list to vger? References: <382A478CAD40FA4FB46605CF81FE39F43A52A9BF@orsmsx507.amr.corp.intel.com> X-Message-Flag: Warning: May contain useful information Date: Fri, 21 Aug 2009 02:10:04 -0700 In-Reply-To: <382A478CAD40FA4FB46605CF81FE39F43A52A9BF@orsmsx507.amr.corp.intel.com> (Robert J. Woodruff's message of "Thu, 20 Aug 2009 15:41:39 -0700") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.0.91 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-OriginalArrivalTime: 21 Aug 2009 09:10:04.0691 (UTC) FILETIME=[2BD16E30:01CA223F] Authentication-Results: sj-dkim-3; header.From=rdreier@cisco.com; dkim=pass ( sig from cisco.com/sjdkim3002 verified; ); Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org > The one question I would have would be do the kernel.org people want to > see all of the traffic that we currently have on the open fabrics > general list for all of the user-space components? I don't believe there's any problem with that. vger already hosts quite a few lists that are userspace only (eg git) or span user and kernel (eg alsa and kvm). And in any case the total traffic (# of subscribers, # of messages) that the current general@ list generates is pretty minimal compared to what vger already handles, so I think there's no problem with having a linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org carry everything that general@lists.openfabrics.org does today. - R.