From: Roland Dreier <rdreier@cisco.com>
To: john.blackwood@ccur.com
Cc: linux-rt-users@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Sven-Thorsten Dietrich <sdietrich@novell.com>,
general@lists.openfabrics.org
Subject: Re: [ofa-general] [PATCH] [WORKAROUND] CONFIG_PREEMPT_RT and ib_umad_close() issue
Date: Mon, 17 Sep 2007 14:40:08 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <adair69nf7r.fsf@cisco.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <46EEB715.7060509@ccur.com> (John Blackwood's message of "Mon, 17 Sep 2007 13:19:17 -0400")
Thanks for the explanation...
> But basically, with CONFIG_PREEMPT_RT enabled, the lock points, such as
> aqcuiring a spinlock, potentially become places where the current task
> may be context switched out / preempted.
>
> Therefore, when a call is made to lock a spinlock for example, the
> caller should not currently have irqs disabled, or preemption disabled,
> since a context switch may occur.
this doesn't seem relevant here...
> void fastcall rt_downgrade_write(struct rw_semaphore *rwsem)
> {
> BUG();
> }
this seems to be the problem... the -rt patch turns downgrade_write()
into a BUG().
I need to look at the locking in user_mad.c again, but I think it may
be possible to replace both places that do downgrade_write() with
up_write() followed by down_read().
- R.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-09-17 21:40 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-09-17 17:19 [ofa-general] [PATCH] [WORKAROUND] CONFIG_PREEMPT_RT and ib_umad_close() issue John Blackwood
2007-09-17 21:40 ` Roland Dreier [this message]
2007-09-17 23:41 ` John Blackwood
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2007-09-17 15:22 John Blackwood
2007-09-17 15:56 ` [ofa-general] " Roland Dreier
2007-09-17 17:07 ` Daniel Walker
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=adair69nf7r.fsf@cisco.com \
--to=rdreier@cisco.com \
--cc=general@lists.openfabrics.org \
--cc=john.blackwood@ccur.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-rt-users@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sdietrich@novell.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox