From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S937025AbXGTRoP (ORCPT ); Fri, 20 Jul 2007 13:44:15 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1764147AbXGTRn5 (ORCPT ); Fri, 20 Jul 2007 13:43:57 -0400 Received: from sj-iport-6.cisco.com ([171.71.176.117]:19718 "EHLO sj-iport-6.cisco.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1763733AbXGTRn4 (ORCPT ); Fri, 20 Jul 2007 13:43:56 -0400 X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: Ao8CAIuQoEarR7MV/2dsb2JhbAA X-IronPort-AV: i="4.16,563,1175497200"; d="scan'208"; a="185759249:sNHT21695643" To: Shannon Nelson Cc: akpm@linux-foundation.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, davem@davemloft.net, jeff@garzik.org, dan.j.williams@intel.com, christopher.leech@intel.com, peter.p.waskiewicz.jr@intel.com Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/7] I/OAT: Add support for MSI and MSI-X X-Message-Flag: Warning: May contain useful information References: <20070720004403.13564.14294.stgit@localhost.localdomain> <20070720004512.13564.55742.stgit@localhost.localdomain> From: Roland Dreier Date: Fri, 20 Jul 2007 10:43:26 -0700 In-Reply-To: <20070720004512.13564.55742.stgit@localhost.localdomain> (Shannon Nelson's message of "Thu, 19 Jul 2007 17:45:12 -0700") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.1007 (Gnus v5.10.7) XEmacs/21.4.20 (linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-OriginalArrivalTime: 20 Jul 2007 17:43:26.0661 (UTC) FILETIME=[7A09CF50:01C7CAF5] Authentication-Results: sj-dkim-1; header.From=rdreier@cisco.com; dkim=pass ( sig from cisco.com/sjdkim1004 verified; ); Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org are there any devices that support MSI but not MSI-X? If not, is there any point in having code to support both? - R.