public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Roland Dreier <rdreier@cisco.com>
To: Mike Travis <travis@sgi.com>
Cc: Andi Kleen <ak@linux.intel.com>,
	Hidetoshi Seto <seto.hidetoshi@jp.fujitsu.com>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, x86@kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86, mce: disable MCE if cpu has no MCE banks
Date: Wed, 28 Oct 2009 11:03:07 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <adar5sns8f8.fsf@cisco.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4AE88151.8000608@sgi.com> (Mike Travis's message of "Wed, 28 Oct 2009 10:37:21 -0700")


 > > But would we want to accumulate all the different combinations of banks
 > > along with a CPU mask and then print something like:
 > >
 > >  CPUs 0 4: MCA banks CMCI:2 CMCI:3 CMCI:5 CMCI:6 SHD:8
 > >  CPUs 1 2 3 5 6 7: MCA banks CMCI:2 CMCI:3 CMCI:5 SHD:6 SHD:8
 > >  CPUs 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15: MCA banks SHD:2 SHD:3 SHD:5 SHD:6 SHD:8
 > 
 > Or use a cpumask and cpulist_scnprintf which condenses the cpu list nicely.

Thanks!  I didn't know about that API.

However with that said I think the real issue is whether that style of
output is a good idea, no matter how nicely the CPU list is formatted :)

 - R.

  reply	other threads:[~2009-10-28 18:03 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2009-10-15 21:21 [PATCH] x86: Don't print number of MCE banks for every CPU Roland Dreier
2009-10-16  7:20 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-10-16  7:22 ` [tip:x86/urgent] " tip-bot for Roland Dreier
2009-10-27 19:42 ` [PATCH] " Mike Travis
2009-10-27 20:53   ` Mike Travis
2009-10-28  4:07     ` [PATCH] x86, mce: disable MCE if cpu has no MCE banks Hidetoshi Seto
2009-10-28  5:24       ` Andi Kleen
2009-10-28  6:26         ` Hidetoshi Seto
2009-10-28  6:48           ` Andi Kleen
2009-10-28  8:18             ` Hidetoshi Seto
2009-10-28 17:09               ` Mike Travis
2009-10-28 17:12             ` Roland Dreier
2009-10-28 17:37               ` Mike Travis
2009-10-28 18:03                 ` Roland Dreier [this message]
2009-10-28 12:03         ` Valdis.Kletnieks
2009-10-28 13:44           ` Andi Kleen
2009-10-28  4:26     ` [PATCH] x86: Don't print number of MCE banks for every CPU Roland Dreier

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=adar5sns8f8.fsf@cisco.com \
    --to=rdreier@cisco.com \
    --cc=ak@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=hpa@zytor.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=seto.hidetoshi@jp.fujitsu.com \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=travis@sgi.com \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox