From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1757666AbYDBQiL (ORCPT ); Wed, 2 Apr 2008 12:38:11 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1755504AbYDBQh5 (ORCPT ); Wed, 2 Apr 2008 12:37:57 -0400 Received: from sj-iport-2.cisco.com ([171.71.176.71]:48290 "EHLO sj-iport-2.cisco.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1755097AbYDBQh5 (ORCPT ); Wed, 2 Apr 2008 12:37:57 -0400 From: Roland Dreier To: Shirley Ma Cc: Richard Frank , general@lists.openfabrics.org, general-bounces@lists.openfabrics.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, rds-devel@oss.oracle.com Subject: Re: [ofa-general] InfiniBand/iWARP/RDMA merge plans for 2.6.26 (what's in infiniband.git) References: X-Message-Flag: Warning: May contain useful information Date: Wed, 02 Apr 2008 09:37:53 -0700 In-Reply-To: (Shirley Ma's message of "Wed, 2 Apr 2008 09:36:12 -0700") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.0.60 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-OriginalArrivalTime: 02 Apr 2008 16:37:56.0125 (UTC) FILETIME=[E76B5CD0:01C894DF] Authentication-Results: sj-dkim-4; header.From=rdreier@cisco.com; dkim=pass ( sig from cisco.com/sjdkim4002 verified; ); Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org > Can the maintainer submit RDS patch for mainline kernel, in 2.6.26 or > 2.6.27 window? It's hard for Distros pick this feature without mainline > kernel acceptance. At least as a first order approximation, there is no chance of RDS being merged for 2.6.26 even if patches appear right this second...