From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1756215AbZHPVun (ORCPT ); Sun, 16 Aug 2009 17:50:43 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1755772AbZHPVum (ORCPT ); Sun, 16 Aug 2009 17:50:42 -0400 Received: from sj-iport-6.cisco.com ([171.71.176.117]:61573 "EHLO sj-iport-6.cisco.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1755896AbZHPVuk (ORCPT ); Sun, 16 Aug 2009 17:50:40 -0400 X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: ApoEAKsbiEqrR7MV/2dsb2JhbAC6WIgtjnsFhBk X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.43,391,1246838400"; d="scan'208";a="368377170" From: Roland Dreier To: James Bottomley Cc: Arjan van de Ven , Alan Cox , Mark Lord , Chris Worley , Matthew Wilcox , Bryan Donlan , david@lang.hm, Greg Freemyer , Markus Trippelsdorf , Matthew Wilcox , Hugh Dickins , Nitin Gupta , Ingo Molnar , Peter Zijlstra , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org, linux-ide@vger.kernel.org, Linux RAID Subject: Re: Discard support References: <200908122007.43522.ngupta@vflare.org> <20090813151312.GA13559@linux.intel.com> <20090813162621.GB1915@phenom2.trippelsdorf.de> <87f94c370908131115r680a7523w3cdbc78b9e82373c@mail.gmail.com> <3e8340490908131354q167840fcv124ec56c92bbb830@mail.gmail.com> <4A85E0DC.9040101@rtr.ca> <20090814234539.GE27148@parisc-linux.org> <1250341176.4159.2.camel@mulgrave.site> <4A86B69C.7090001@rtr.ca> <1250344518.4159.4.camel@mulgrave.site> <20090816150530.2bae6d1f@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk> <20090816083434.2ce69859@infradead.org> <1250437927.3856.119.camel@mulgrave.site> X-Message-Flag: Warning: May contain useful information Date: Sun, 16 Aug 2009 14:50:40 -0700 In-Reply-To: <1250437927.3856.119.camel@mulgrave.site> (James Bottomley's message of "Sun, 16 Aug 2009 10:52:07 -0500") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.0.91 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-OriginalArrivalTime: 16 Aug 2009 21:50:41.0204 (UTC) FILETIME=[993BEF40:01CA1EBB] Authentication-Results: sj-dkim-1; header.From=rdreier@cisco.com; dkim=pass ( sig from cisco.com/sjdkim1004 verified; ); Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org > Well, yes and no ... a lot of SSDs don't actually implement NCQ, so the > impact to them will be less ... although I think enterprise class SSDs > do implement NCQ. Really? Which SSDs don't implement NCQ? It seems that one couldn't keep the flash busy doing only one command at time.