public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Roland Dreier <rdreier@cisco.com>
To: "Satyam Sharma" <satyam.sharma@gmail.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, openib-general@openib.org
Subject: Re: [ofa-general] Re: dealing with gcc 'comparison is always false' warnings
Date: Wed, 30 May 2007 08:56:37 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <adaveeaqp8q.fsf@cisco.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <a781481a0705300841k2a02335eg66985129eaed28f4@mail.gmail.com> (Satyam Sharma's message of "Wed, 30 May 2007 21:11:29 +0530")

 > However, gcc is _just as correct_. It is only crying about seeing a condition
 > that the programmer could have written with some purpose in mind but which
 > is being completely compiled away by it when generating the code because
 > of it being a tautology / contradiction ...

Well, OK, but there's lots of things gcc could warn about.  How about

	while (1) { ...

By your argument gcc should warn that '1' always evaluates to true.
Or how about

#if 0

why shouldn't the preprocessor warn that the conditional is always false?

 > No, shutting gcc up wouldn't be the right thing, IMHO. These warnings are
 > a good reminder to the programmer to go and see if there is a real bug
 > somewhere and if something really needs to be done with the code (could
 > be simply to change the type of a variable to signed that was mistakenly
 > declared unsigned, f.e.).

OK, but suppose I looked at it and there's no bug.  Leaving the
warning has a cost too: it hides useful warnings (that might be
showing real bugs) in all the clutter.

 - R.

  reply	other threads:[~2007-05-30 15:56 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2007-05-30  8:05 [PATCH] drivers/infiniband: fix comparsion between unsigned and negative Bill Nottingham
2007-05-30 15:30 ` dealing with gcc 'comparison is always false' warnings (was: [PATCH] drivers/infiniband: fix comparsion between unsigned and negative) Roland Dreier
2007-05-30 15:41   ` Satyam Sharma
2007-05-30 15:56     ` Roland Dreier [this message]
2007-05-30 17:00       ` [ofa-general] Re: dealing with gcc 'comparison is always false' warnings Satyam Sharma
2007-05-30 16:06     ` dealing with gcc 'comparison is always false' warnings (was: [PATCH] drivers/infiniband: fix comparsion between unsigned and negative) Satyam Sharma
2007-05-30 19:00     ` dealing with gcc 'comparison is always false' warnings Tilman Schmidt
2007-05-30 19:14       ` Satyam Sharma
2007-05-30 19:09     ` dealing with gcc 'comparison is always false' warnings (was: [PATCH] drivers/infiniband: fix comparsion between unsigned and negative) Bill Nottingham
2007-05-30 19:23       ` Satyam Sharma
2007-05-30 20:48 ` [ofa-general] [PATCH] drivers/infiniband: fix comparsion between unsigned and negative Roland Dreier

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=adaveeaqp8q.fsf@cisco.com \
    --to=rdreier@cisco.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=openib-general@openib.org \
    --cc=satyam.sharma@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox