Re: [PATCH 1/2] iWARP Connection Manager.

[Roland Dreier <rdreier@cisco.com>]

This is a silly thing to argue about, but...

 > The preferred form for passing a size of a struct is the following:
 > 
 > 	p = kmalloc(sizeof(*p), ...);
 > 
 > The alternative form where struct name is spelled out hurts readability and
 > introduces an opportunity for a bug when the pointer variable type is changed
 > but the corresponding sizeof that is passed to a memory allocator is not.

I would argue that this is talking about sizeof(*p) vs. sizeof (struct foo)
rather than sizeof(*p) vs. sizeof *p.

You wouldn't write:

	return(*p);

but rather

	return *p;

And sizeof is an operator not a function, so I think the same usage
would apply.

With that said the prevalent kernel usage does seem to be sizeof(*foo)
(by about 10 to 1).  But I can't help feeling it looks silly.

 - R.