From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S936939AbYEBWxm (ORCPT ); Fri, 2 May 2008 18:53:42 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S932140AbYEBWxb (ORCPT ); Fri, 2 May 2008 18:53:31 -0400 Received: from sj-iport-2.cisco.com ([171.71.176.71]:46171 "EHLO sj-iport-2.cisco.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1759362AbYEBWxa (ORCPT ); Fri, 2 May 2008 18:53:30 -0400 From: Roland Dreier To: "Moore\, Eric" Cc: "David Miller" , , Subject: Re: HELP: Is writeq an atomic operation?? References: <0631C836DBF79F42B5A60C8C8D4E822901047B3A@NAMAIL2.ad.lsil.com> X-Message-Flag: Warning: May contain useful information Date: Fri, 02 May 2008 15:53:28 -0700 In-Reply-To: <0631C836DBF79F42B5A60C8C8D4E822901047B3A@NAMAIL2.ad.lsil.com> (Eric Moore's message of "Fri, 2 May 2008 16:49:55 -0600") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.0.60 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-OriginalArrivalTime: 02 May 2008 22:53:29.0100 (UTC) FILETIME=[5682FCC0:01C8ACA7] Authentication-Results: sj-dkim-1; header.From=rdreier@cisco.com; dkim=pass ( sig from cisco.com/sjdkim1004 verified; ); Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org > > Are there any 32-bit platforms with writeq()? A quick grep > > suggests not. > > I think writeq defined in include/asm-x86/io_64.h Umm... io_64.h is 64-bit only (look at asm-x86/io.h if you don't believe me ;) - R.