public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Jin, Yao" <yao.jin@linux.intel.com>
To: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@kernel.org>
Cc: jolsa@kernel.org, peterz@infradead.org, mingo@redhat.com,
	alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com, Linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	ak@linux.intel.com, kan.liang@intel.com, yao.jin@intel.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 2/6] perf record: Get the first sample time and last sample time
Date: Fri, 20 Oct 2017 06:49:10 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <adbfedcf-9a69-3a2f-e788-6a8a34bb6264@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20171019202549.GC30002@kernel.org>



On 10/20/2017 4:25 AM, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:
> Em Thu, Oct 19, 2017 at 05:21:27PM -0300, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo escreveu:
>> Em Tue, Oct 03, 2017 at 10:22:34PM +0800, Jin Yao escreveu:
>>> In perf record, it's walked on all samples yet. So it's very easy to get
>>
>> You're saying that perf record walks all samples always? That only
>> happens when we generate the build-id table, right? And people disable
>> that to speed up the process, knowing that some limitations will come
>> from that, for doing analysis right after running it is mostly OK to
>> disable the build-id processing.
> 
> So either you add a new option that processes all events without doing
> build-id processing (and all the locking, struct thread, map, etc
> processing it entails) and just looks at the sample->time, and when
> build id processing is enabled, just do as you're doing in this patch,
> then, at perf report --time you should look to see if those start/end
> times were filled in and if not tell that to the user, i.e. that
> either --record-time-boundaries (or a better name :-) ) has to be used,
> or, that build-id process, with a short explanation that
> --record-time-boundaries is a bit cheaper.
> 
> - Arnaldo
>   

Hi Arnaldo,

Thanks so much for reminding me that the walking only happens when 
build-id processing is enabled. Yes, the step is same as what you said 
so there will be an issue when the build-id processing is disabled.

According to your suggestion, I will provide a new option 
"--record-time-boundaries" in perf record. If user disables the build-id 
processing, the perf record will ask user to set the 
"--record-time-boundaries". If user enables the build-id processing, the 
perf record will not ask user to set the "--record-time-boundaries".

Also in perf report, if it doesn't see start/end time filled in the perf 
file header, it will show some information to let user know he should 
set "--record-time-boundaries" or enable the build-id processing in perf 
record.

I will provide v5 patch series, maybe some days later.

Thanks
Jin Yao

  reply	other threads:[~2017-10-19 22:49 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-10-03 14:22 [PATCH v4 0/6] perf report/script: Support percent and multiple range in --time option Jin Yao
2017-10-03 14:22 ` [PATCH v4 1/6] perf header: Record first sample time and last sample time in perf file header Jin Yao
2017-10-19 20:17   ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2017-10-03 14:22 ` [PATCH v4 2/6] perf record: Get the first sample time and last sample time Jin Yao
2017-10-19 20:21   ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2017-10-19 20:25     ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2017-10-19 22:49       ` Jin, Yao [this message]
2017-10-03 14:22 ` [PATCH v4 3/6] perf util: Create function to parse time percent Jin Yao
2017-10-03 14:22 ` [PATCH v4 4/6] perf util: Create function to perform multiple time range checking Jin Yao
2017-10-03 14:22 ` [PATCH v4 5/6] perf report: support time percent and multiple time ranges Jin Yao
2017-10-03 14:22 ` [PATCH v4 6/6] perf script: " Jin Yao
2017-10-05  8:50 ` [PATCH v4 0/6] perf report/script: Support percent and multiple range in --time option Jiri Olsa
2017-10-18  7:19   ` Jin, Yao

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=adbfedcf-9a69-3a2f-e788-6a8a34bb6264@linux.intel.com \
    --to=yao.jin@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=Linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=acme@kernel.org \
    --cc=ak@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=jolsa@kernel.org \
    --cc=kan.liang@intel.com \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=yao.jin@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox